Skip to main content
Log in

Common elements in the analysis of the negotiation process

  • In Theory
  • Published:
Negotiation Journal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelrod, R. (1970).The conflict of interest. Chicago: Markham.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1984).The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S. andLawler, E. (1981).Bargaining: Power, tactics, and outcomes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, D. A. (1987). “Bargaining with airline hijackers.” In Zartman, 1987b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, S. andPeterson, C. (1976).Multi-attribute utility models. McLean, Va.: Designs and Decisions, Technical Report 76-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartos, O. (1974).Process and outcome of negotiations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1978). “Simple model of negotiation.” In Zartman, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1987). “How predictable are negotiations?” In Zartman 1987b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendahmane, D. andMcDonald, J., eds. (1984).International negotiation. Washington: State Department Foreign Service Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1986).Perspectives on negotiation. Washington: State Department Foreign Service Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S. (1985).Superpower games. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, W. R. et al. (1978).Trade negotiations in the Tokyo Round. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coddington, A. (1968)Theories of the bargaining process. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. (1969).The economics of bargaining. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidow, J. (1984).A peace in Southern Africa. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1973).Resolution of conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, D. (1986). “Stages, turning points, and crises.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 30:327–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. (1975). “Theory and practice of blackmail.” In Young, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. W. (1971).The Kennedy Round in American trade policy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Filley, A. C. (1975).International conflict resolution. Glenview, Ill.: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. andUry, W. L. (1981).Getting to YES. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedheim, R. (1987). “The third United Nations conference on the Law of the Sea.” In Zartman, 1987.

  • Gulliver, P. H. (1979).Disputes and negotiations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habeeb, W. M. (1987).Asymmetrical negotiations: Panama, Spain, Iceland. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesch, J. (1987). “Who ‘wins’ in wage bargaining?” In Zartman, 1987b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. (1956). “Approaches to the bargaining problem before and after the theory of games.” In Young, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1977).Rational behavior and bargaining equilibrium in games and social situations. New York: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. (1932).The theory of wages. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipel, K. andFraser, N. (1984).Conflict analysis. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. (1961).Social behavior. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopmann, P. T. (1978). “An application of the Richardson Process Model.” In Zartman, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikle, F. C. (1968). “Negotiation.” InInternational Encyclopedia of the social sciences, vol. 2, p. 117. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1964).How nations negotiate. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— andLeites, N. (1962). “Political negotiation as a process of modifying utilities.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 6:19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, C. (1978). “Situation-specific vs. actor-specific approaches to international bargaining.”European Journal of Political Research 6:381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karrass, C. (1970).The negotiation game. New York: World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. (1969). “The Vietnam negotiations.”Foreign Affairs 47:211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khury, F. (1968). “The etiquette of bargaining in the Middle East.”American Anthropologist 70:698–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. andKaplan, A. (1950).Power and society. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lax, D. andSebenius, J. (1986).The manager as negotiator. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, C. (1985). “Banker's dilemma.”World Politics 38 (October):200–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (1950). “The bargaining problem.” In Young, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, H. (1939).Diplomacy. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nierenberg, G. (1973).Fundamentals of negotiating. New York: Hawthorn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyerges, J. (1987). “Ten commandments for a negotiator.”Negotiation Journal 3:21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pen, J. (1952). “A general theory of bargaining.” In Young, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillar, P. (1983).Negotiation peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preeg, E. (1970).Traders and diplomats. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D. (1981).Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H. (1982).The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. andBrown, B. (1975).The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, H. (1985).The other walls. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. (1960).The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopenhauer, A. (1896).The art of controversy. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebenius, J. K. (1984).Negotiating the Law of the Sea. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1957).Models of man. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, G. andDiesing, P. (1977).Conflict among nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valavanis, S. (1958). “Resolution of conflict when utilities interact.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 2:156–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H. (1957). “A unified treatment of bargaining theory.” In Young, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. andMcKersie, R. (1965).A behavioral theory of labor negotiations. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winham, G. (1987).International trade and the Tokyo Round negotiation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wriggins, H. (1987). “Up for auction.” In Zartman, 1987b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O., ed. (1975).Bargaining. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagare, F. (1978). “Game theoretic analysis of the Vietnam negotiations.” In Zartman, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1983).Ripe for resolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1985). “Negotiating from asymmetry: The North-South Stalemente”Negotiation Journal 1:121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, ed. (1987a).Positive sum: Improving North-South negotiations. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, ed. (1987b).The 50% solution, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • --. (1987c). “Managing multilateral complexity: Many are called but few chose.” Paper presented to the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 1987.

  • —— andBerman, M. (1982).The practical negotiator. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeuthen, F. (1930). “Economic warfare.” In Young, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

I. William Zartman is Professor of International Politics at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies, Washington, D.C. His recent edited works include the second edition ofThe 50% Solution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987) andPositive Sum: Improving North-South Negotiations (New Brunswick: Transaction, 1987). His latest book isRipe for Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa (New York: Oxford, 1985).

About this article

Cite this article

Zartman, I.W. Common elements in the analysis of the negotiation process. Negot J 4, 31–43 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000902

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000902

Keywords

Navigation