Open Economies Review

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 117–132 | Cite as

Rules, discretion, and international monetary and fiscal policy coordination

  • Jay H. Bryson
  • Henrik Jensen
  • David D. van Hoose


This paper considers the implications of international policy coordination when both monetary and fiscal policy choices are endogenous. We show that a movement from insular monetary commitment to international monetary policy coordination will, if fiscal policies are not coordinated, produce higher output and public expenditure levels at the expense of higher inflation rates. We also show that the concurrent coordination of monetary and fiscal policies raises output and inflation while lowering public expenditure relative to a regime of monetary coordination alone. We conclude that the arguments for concurrent monetary and fiscal policy coordination fail to have a clear-cut theoretical basis.

Key words

international policy coordination 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alesina, Alberto and Guido Tabellini (1987) “Rules and Discretion with Noncoordinated Monetary and Fiscal Policies,”Economic Inquiry 25, 619–630.Google Scholar
  2. Canzoneri, Matthew B. (1985) “Monetary Policy Games and the Role of Private Information,”American Economic Review 75, 1056–1070.Google Scholar
  3. Canzoneri, Matthew B. and Dale W. Henderson (1988) “Is Sovereign Policymaking Bad?” In Karl Brunner and Allan H. Meltzer (eds)Stabilization Policies and Labor Markets, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 28. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 93–140.Google Scholar
  4. Canzoneri, Matthew B. and Dale W. Henderson (1991)Monetary Policy in Interdependent Economies: A Game Theoretic Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carraro, Carlo (1989) “The Tastes of European Central Bankers.” In Marcello de Cecco and Alberto Giovannini (eds),A European Central Bank? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 162–189.Google Scholar
  6. Frankel, Jeffrey A. and Katherine E. Rockett (1988) “International Policy Coordination when Policymakers Do Not Agree on the True Model,”American Economic Review 78, 318–340.Google Scholar
  7. Fratianni, Michele and Juergen von Hagen (1990) “Public Choice Aspects of European Monetary Unification,”Cato Journal 10, 389–411.Google Scholar
  8. Jensen, Henrik (1991) “Tax Distortions, Unemployment, and International Policy Cooperation,” Unpublished Manuscript, Centre for International Economics and Institute of Economics, University of Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
  9. Kenen, Peter B. (1989)Exchange Rates and Policy Coordination. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  10. Oudiz, Gilles and Jeffrey Sachs (1984) “Macroeconomic Policy Coordination Among the Industrial Economies,”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–64.Google Scholar
  11. Oudiz, Gilles and Jeffrey Sachs (1985) “International Policy Coordination in Dynamic Macroeconomic Models.” In Willem H. Buiter and Richard C. Marston (eds),International Economic Policy Coordination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 274–325.Google Scholar
  12. Rogoff, Kenneth (1985) “Can International Monetary Policy Cooperation be Counterproductive?”Journal of International Economics 18, 199–217.Google Scholar
  13. Tabellini, Guido (1990) “Domestic Politics and the International Coordination of Fiscal Policies,”Journal of International Economics 28, 245–265.Google Scholar
  14. Van Hoose, David D. (1992) “Monetary Policy Centralization, Rules, Discretion, and Conservative Central Bankers in the European Monetary System,”Journal of Economics and Business, 44, 247–263.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay H. Bryson
    • 1
  • Henrik Jensen
    • 2
  • David D. van Hoose
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.University of AarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations