Policy Sciences

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 385–396 | Cite as

Response: Toward a critical sociology of policy analysis

  • John Forester
Book Review Essay

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benhabib, Seyla (1992).Situating the Self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, Richard (1971).Praxis and Action. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, Richard (1976).The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, Richard (1983).Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, John (1927).The Public and Its Problems. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  6. Dryzek, John (1990).Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dryzek, John (1995). ‘Critical theory as a research program,’ in Stephen White, ed.The Cambridge Companion to Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Edelman, Murray (1971).Politics as Symbolic Action. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Feldman, Martha (1989).Order Without Design: Information Production and Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fischer, Frank and John Forester (1993).The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Forester, John (1987). ‘Anticipating implementation: Normative practices in planning and policy analysis,’ in Frank Fischer and John Forester, eds.,Confronting Values in Policy Analysis: The Politics of Criteria. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Forester, John (1989).Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Forester, John (1993).Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gaventa, John (1980).Power and Powerlesness: Quiescence and Rebellion in An Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  15. Heritage, John (1984).Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lukes, Steven (1974).Power: A Radical View. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Putnam, Hilary (1990).Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pitkin, Hanna (1972).Wittgenstein and Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Reich, Robert (1988). ‘Policy-making in a democracy,’ in hisThe Power of Public Ideas, Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  20. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960).The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
  21. Schroyer, Trent (1973).The Critique of Domination. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Walzer, Michael (1980). ‘A day in the life of the socialist citizen,’ inRadical Principles. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Forester
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of City and Regional PlanningCornell UniversityIthaca

Personalised recommendations