Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 120–133 | Cite as

Nonverbal expressiveness and physical attractiveness as mediators of interpersonal perceptions

  • Ronald M. Sabatelli
  • Michal Rubin
Article

Abstract

This research examines the impact of spontaneous nonverbal expressiveness and physical attractiveness on the formation of initial interpersonal impressions. It was hypothesized that in the absence of a relationship history with a person, those people who provide more spontaneous, uncensored, nonverbal information would be viewed as more interpersonally attractive. In addition, as a secondary focus of the study, data were analyzed to examine the relationship between physical attractiveness and nonverbal communication abilities. Results suggest that both physical attractiveness and nonverbal expressiveness independent of one another and in conjunction with one another positively impact on interpersonal perceptions. In addition, physical attractiveness was found to positively covary with nonverbal encoding accuracy but negatively covary with nonverbal decoding abilities.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, G.R. Physical attractiveness research: Toward a developmental social psychology of beauty.Human Development, 20, 217–239.Google Scholar
  2. Argyle, M.Bodily Communication. London: Methuen, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. Bayes, M.A. Behavioral cues of interpersonal warmth.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972,29, 333–339.Google Scholar
  4. Berscheid, E. & Walster, E. Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 6. NY: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. Brideau, L.B. & Allen, V.L. Individual differences in nonverbal communication: Facial and vocal encoding.Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Individualized Schooling, Technical Report No. 567, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. Buck, R. The evolution and development of emotion expression and communication. In S. Brehm, S. Kassin, and F. Gibbons (Eds.),Developmental social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. Buck, R. Individual differences in nonverbal sending accuracy and electrodermal responding: The externalizing-internalizing dimension. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.),Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, & Hain, 1979a.Google Scholar
  8. Buck, R. Measuring individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect.Human Communication Research, 1979b,6, 47–57.Google Scholar
  9. Buck, R. A test of nonverbal receiving ability: Preliminary studies.Human Communication Research, 1976,2, 162–171.Google Scholar
  10. Buck, R., Miller, R.E. & Caul, W. F. Sex, personality, and physiological variables in the communication of emotion via facial expression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974,30, 587–596.Google Scholar
  11. Buck, R., Savin, V.J., Miller, R.E., & Caul, W.F. Nonverbal communication of affect in humans.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,23, 362–371.Google Scholar
  12. Ekman, R., & Friesen, W.V. Detecting deceptions from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974,29, 288–298.Google Scholar
  13. LaCrosse, M.B. Nonverbal behavior and perceived counselor attractiveness and persuasiveness.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1975,22, 563–566.Google Scholar
  14. Larrance, D.T. & Zuckerman, M. Facial attractiveness and vocal likeability as determinants of nonverbal sending skills.Journal of Personality, 1981,49, 349–362.Google Scholar
  15. Poling, T.H. Sex differences, dominance, and physical attractiveness in the use of nonverbal emblems.Psychological Reports, 1978,43, 1087–1092.Google Scholar
  16. Reis, H.T., Wheeler, L., Speigel, N., Kernis, M.H., Nezlek, J., & Perri, M. Physical attractiveness in social interaction: II. Why does appearance affect social experience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982,40, 979–996.Google Scholar
  17. Sabatelli, R.M., Buck, R., & Dreyer, A. Nonverbal communication accuracy in married couples: Relationship with marital complaints.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982,43, 1088–1097.Google Scholar
  18. Strong, S.R., Taylor, R.G., Bratton, J.C., & Loper, R.G. Nonverbal behavior and perceived counselor characteristics.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1971,18, 554–561.Google Scholar
  19. Shrout, P.E. & Fiske, D.W. Nonverbal behaviors and social evaluations.Journal of Personality, 1981,49, 115–128.Google Scholar
  20. Zuckerman, M., Hall, J.A., DeFrank, R.S., & Rosenthal, R. Encoding and decoding of spontaneous and posed facial expressions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 966–977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald M. Sabatelli
    • 1
  • Michal Rubin
    • 2
  1. 1.Human Development and Family Relations, U-117University of ConnecticutStorrs
  2. 2.the University of WisconsinUSA

Personalised recommendations