Advertisement

Zoomorphologie

, Volume 91, Issue 3, pp 235–248 | Cite as

A new function of rhabdites: Mucus production for ciliary gliding

  • Gary G. Martin
Article

Summary

Rhabdites are rod-shaped secretory products characteristic of the Turbellaria but also found in nemerteans, gastrotrichs and annelids. Their functions are poorly understood. The structure, synthesis and secretion of rhabdites were studied in one archiannelid (Protodrilus sp.), and three turbellarians (Alloioplana californica, Polycladida;Monocelis cincta, Alloeocoela;Polychoerus carmelensis, Acoela). InAlloioplana, Monocelis andPolychoerus the rhabdites are the only, or most common, secretory product released on the ventral locomotor sole and therefore they are thought to form the viscous mucus used in locomotion by ciliary gliding. InProtodrilus, rhabdites are released along the ventrolateral margin of the worm and are secreted only when the worm tries to move by ciliary gliding against strong water currents. It is proposed that the principal function of rhabdites in the worms studied, is adhesion.

Keywords

Developmental Biology Water Current Secretory Product Mucus Production Principal Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bedini, C., Papi, F.: Fine structure of the turbellarian epidermis. In: Biology of the Turbellaria (N.W. Riser, M.F. Morse, eds), pp. 108–147. New York: McGraw-Hill 1974Google Scholar
  2. Boaden, P.J.S., Erwin, D.G.:Turbanella hyalina versusProtodriloides symbioticus: a study in interstitial ecology. Vie et Milieu ser. A,22, 479–492 (1971)Google Scholar
  3. Claparede, E.: Les Annélides Chétopodes du Golfe de Naples. Memoires de la Société de Physique et D'Histoire Naturelle de Genève, vols. 19 and 20 (1867)Google Scholar
  4. Costello, H.M., Costello, D.P.: A new species ofPolychoerus from the Pacific Coast. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. II,1, 148–155 (1938)Google Scholar
  5. Coward, S.J., Piedilato, J.W.: Behavioral significance of rhabdite cells in planaria. J. Biol. Psychol.14, 5–7 (1972)Google Scholar
  6. Gontcharoff, M.: Étude des rhabdites de la trompe deLineus ruber (Nèmertien) as microscope èlectronique. C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris)244, 1539–1541 (1957)Google Scholar
  7. Grimstone, A.V.: Structure and function in protozoa. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.20, 131–150 (1966)Google Scholar
  8. Heath, H., McGregor, E.A.: New polyclads from Monteray Bay, California. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.64, 455–488 (1912)Google Scholar
  9. Hovasse, R.: Trichocysts, corps trichocystöides, cnidocystes et colloblastes, Protoplasmatologia3F, 1–57 (1965)Google Scholar
  10. Hulings, N.C., Gray, J.S.: A manual for the study of meiofauna. Smithson, Contrib. Zool. #78 (1971)Google Scholar
  11. Humason, G.L.: Animal tissue techniques. San Francisco: Freeman 1972Google Scholar
  12. Hyman, L.H.: The invertebrates, Vol. II. Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela. New York: McGraw-Hill 1951Google Scholar
  13. Karling, T.G.: Marine Turbellaria from the Pacific Coast of North America. IV. Coelogynoporidae and Monocelididae. Ark. Zool.18, 493–528 (1966)Google Scholar
  14. Kryvi, H.: The fine structure of the ventral mucous cells ofSabella penicillium (Polychaeta). Sarsia48, 23–32 (1972)Google Scholar
  15. Lentz, T.L.: Rhabdite formation in planaria: the role of microtubules. J. Ultrastruct. Res.17, 114–126 (1967)Google Scholar
  16. Mamkaev, Y.V.: Étude morphologique D'ActinoposthiaBeklemischevi n. sp. (Turbellaria, Acoela). Cah. Biol. Mar.6, 23–50 (1965)Google Scholar
  17. Martin, G.G.: The duo-gland adhesive system of the archiannelidsProtodrius andSaccocirrus and the turbellarianMonocelis. Zoomorphologie91, 63–75 (1978)Google Scholar
  18. Martin, G.G.: Ciliary gliding in lower invertebrates. Zoomorphologie91, 249–261 (1978)Google Scholar
  19. Nicols, K.C.: Observations on lesser-known flatworms; Temnocephala. Int. J. Parasitol.5, 245–252 (1975)Google Scholar
  20. Pedersen, K.J.: Slime secreting cells of planaria. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.106, 424–442 (1963)Google Scholar
  21. Pedersen, K.J.: Cytological and cytochemical observations on the mucous gland cells of as acoel turbellarianConvoluta convoluta. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.118, 930–965 (1965)Google Scholar
  22. Pierantoni, U.:Protodrilus. Fauna u Flora Neapel31, 1–226 (1908)Google Scholar
  23. Reisinger, E.: Ultrastrukturforschung und Evolution. Ber. Physik. Med. Gesselsch. Würzburg,77, 5–47 (1969)Google Scholar
  24. Reisinger, E., Kelbetz, S.: Feinbau und Entladungsmechanismus der Rhabditen. Z. Wiss. Liche Mikrosk.65, 472–508 (1964)Google Scholar
  25. Rieger, R.M., Mainitz, M.: Comparative fine structure study of the body wall in Gnathostomulida and their phylogenetic position between Platyhelminthes and Aschelminthes. Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch.15, 9–34 (1977)Google Scholar
  26. Rieger, R.M., Ruppert, E., Rieger, G.E., Schoepfer-Sterrer, C.: On the fine structure of gastrotrichs with description ofChordodasys antennatus sp.n. Zool. Scr.3, 219–237 (1974)Google Scholar
  27. Schopfer-Sterrer, C.:Chordodasys reidli gen. nov., spec. nov. A macrodasyoid gastrotrich with a chordoid organ. Cah. Biol. Mar.10, 391–404 (1969)Google Scholar
  28. Skaer, R.J.: Some aspects of the cytology ofPolycelis nigra. Q.J. Microsc. Sci.102, 295–317 (1961)Google Scholar
  29. Sterrer, W.: On some ofAustrognatharia, Pterognathia andHaplognathia nov. gen. from the North Caroline coast (Gnathostomulida). Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol.55, 371–385 (1970)Google Scholar
  30. Tyler, S.: Comparative ultrastructure of adhesive systems in the Turbellaria. Zoomorphologie84, 1–76 (1976)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary G. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations