Advertisement

Biofeedback and Self-regulation

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 299–312 | Cite as

Operant conditioning of EEG rhythms and ritalin in the treatment of hyperkinesis

  • M. N. Shouse
  • J. F. Lubar
Original Articles

Abstract

Enhanced voluntary motor inhibition regularly accompanies conditioned increases in the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR), a 12–14-Hz Rolandic EEG rhythm in cats. A similar rhythm, presumably SMR, has also been identified in the human EEG. The clinical effectiveness of SMR operant conditioning has been claimed for epilepsy, insomnia, and hyperkinesis concurrent with seizure disorders. The present report attempts to follow up and replicate preliminary findings that suggested the technique's successful application to hyperkinesis uncomplicated by a history of epilepsy. SMR was defined as 12–14-Hz EEG activity in the absence of high-voltage slow-wave activity between 4 and 7 Hz. Anticipated treatment effects were indexed by systematic behavioral assessments of undirected motor activity and short attention span in the classroom. EEG and behavioral indices were monitored in four hyperkinetic children under the following six conditions: (1) No Drug, (2) Drug Only, (3) Drug and SMR Training I, (4) Drug and SMR Reversal Training, (5) Drug and SMR Training II, (6) No Drug and SMR Training. All hyperkinetic subjects were maintained on a constant drug regimen throughout the phases employing chemotherapy. Contingent increases and decreases in SMR occurred in three of four training subjects and were associated with similar changes in classroom assessments of motor inactivity. Combining medication and SMR training resulted in substantial improvements that exceeded the effects of drugs alone and were sustained with SMR training after medication was withdrawn. In contrast, these physiological and behavioral changes were absent in one highly distractible subject who failed to acquire the SMR task. Finally, pretraining levels of SMR accurately reflected both the severity of original motor deficits and the susceptibility of hyperkinetic subjects to both treatments. Although the procedure clearly reduced hyperkinetic behavior, a salient, specific therapeutic factor could not be identified due to the dual EEG contingency imposed combined with associated changes in EMG. Despite these and other qualifying factors, the findings suggested the prognostic and diagnostic value of the SMR in the disorder when overactivity rather than distractibility is the predominant behavioral deficit.

Keywords

Ritalin Operant Conditioning Voluntary Motor Classroom Assessment Reversal Training 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayllon, T., Layman, D., & Kandel, H. J. A behavioral educational alternative to drug control of hyperactive children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1975,8 137–146.Google Scholar
  2. Chase, M. H., & Harper, R. M. Somatomotor and visceromotor correlates of operantly conditioned 12–14 c/sec sensorimotor cortical activity.Journal of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1971,31 85–92.Google Scholar
  3. Feinstein, B., Sterman, M. B., & Macdonald, L. K. Effects on sleep of EEG biofeedback training of sensorimotor cortical rhythms.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1975,2, (Abstract).Google Scholar
  4. Finley, W. W., Smith, H. A., & Etherton, M. D. Reduction of seizures and normalization of the EEG in a severe epileptic following sensorimotor biofeedback training: Preliminary study.Biological Psychology 1975,2 189–203.Google Scholar
  5. Goodman, S. J., Fairchild, M. D., Holcombe, B., & Sterman, M. B. The immobilization response in primates and 12–16 cps sensorimotor cortex activity.Journal of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1976,37 114.Google Scholar
  6. Hampstead, W. J. The effects of EMG-assisted relaxation training with hyperkinetic children: A behavioral alternative.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1979,4 113–125.Google Scholar
  7. Howe, R. C., & Sterman, M. B. Cortical-subcortical EEG correlates of suppressed motor behavior during sleep and waking in the cat.Journal of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1972,32 681–695.Google Scholar
  8. Lubar, J. F., & Bahler, W. W. Behavioral management of epileptic seizures following biofeedback training of the sensorimotor rhythm.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1976,1 77–104.Google Scholar
  9. Lubar, J. F., & Shouse, M. N. EEG and behavioral changes in a hyperkinetic child concurrent with training of the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR): A preliminary report.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1976,3 293–306.Google Scholar
  10. Lubar, J. F., & Shouse, M. N. Use of biofeedback in the treatment of seizure disorders and hyperactivity. InAdvances in child clinical psychology. New York: Plenum Press, 1977. Pp. 203–265.Google Scholar
  11. Roth, S. R., Sterman, M. B., & Clemente, C. D. Comparison of EEG correlates of reinforcement, internal inhibition, and sleep.Journal of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1966,23 509–520.Google Scholar
  12. Satterfield, J. H., Cantwell, D. P., Lesser, L. I., & Rodesin, R. L. Physiological studies of the hyperkinetic child: I.American Journal of Psychiatry 1972,128 1419–1424.Google Scholar
  13. Shouse, M. N., & Lubar, J. F. Physiological basis of hyperkinesis treated with methylphenidate.Pediatrics 1978,62(3), 343.Google Scholar
  14. Snyder, S. H., & Meyerhoff, J. L. How amphetamines act in minimal brain dysfunction.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1973,205 310–320.Google Scholar
  15. Sterman, M. B. Effects of brain surgery and EEG operant conditioning on seizure latency following monomethylhydrazine intoxication in the cat.Experimental Neurology 1976,50 757–765.Google Scholar
  16. Sterman, M. B. Sensorimotor EEG operant conditioning and experimental and clinical effects.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science 1977,12(2), 65–92.Google Scholar
  17. Sterman, M. B., & Friar, L. Suppression of seizures in an epileptic following sensorimotor EEG feedback training.Journal of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1972,33 89–95.Google Scholar
  18. Sterman, M. B., Howe, R. C., & Macdonald, L. T., 1970.Google Scholar
  19. Sterman, M. B., Macdonald, L. T., & Stone, R. K. Biofeedback training of the sensorimotor electroencephalographic rhythm in man: Effects on epilepsy.Epilepsia 1974,15 395–416.Google Scholar
  20. Sterman, M. B., & Wyrwicka, W. A. EEG correlated of sleep: Evidence for separate forebrain substrates.Brain Research 1967,6 143–163.Google Scholar
  21. Stevens, J. R., Sachdeo, K., & Milskin, V. Behavior disorders of childhood and electroencephalogram.Archives of Neurology (Chicago) 1968,18 160.Google Scholar
  22. Wahler, R. G., House, A. E., & Stanbaugh, E.Ecological assessment of child problem behavior. New York: Pergamon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. N. Shouse
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. F. Lubar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.V.A. Medical CenterSepulveda
  2. 2.UCLA School of Medicine, and The University of TennesseeUSA

Personalised recommendations