Advertisement

Biofeedback and Self-regulation

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 63–75 | Cite as

Conflicting results in EEG alpha feedback studies

Why amplitude integration should replace percent time
  • James V. Hardt
  • Joe Kamiya
Articles

Abstract

Success or failure of EEG feedback training for alpha enhancement can depend on how alpha activity is quantified and fed back. Alpha-enhancement failures usually employ a percent time(%) technique; successes typically use amplitude integration(ε). To dramatize the differences between percent and integration techniques, we derived both measures simultaneously from left occipital(O 1 ) and left central(C 3 ) sites for 16 male subjects who were given 5.6 hours of integrated alpha feedback from the midline occipital(Oz) site. At both the O 1 and C 3 sites the integrated and percent measures were not equivalent and not linearly related. Statistically significant differences in the(integrated, percent) correlation coefficients(z-transformed) were observed under the different recording conditions: alpha enhancement, alpha enhancement, alpha suppression, and baselines. Theoretical discussion of integration and percent techniques is given and the adoption of amplitude integration measures and feedback stimuli is strongly advocated.

Keywords

Recording Condition Integration Measure Theoretical Discussion Integration Technique Alpha Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anand, B. K., Chhina, G. S., & Singh, B. Some aspects of electroencephalographic studies in Yogis.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1961,13 452–456.Google Scholar
  2. Banquet, J. P. Spectral analysis of the EEG in meditation.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1973,35 143–151.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, B. B. Recognition of aspects of consciousness through association with EEG alpha activity represented by a light signal.Psychophysiology 1970,6 442–452.Google Scholar
  4. Cleeland, C. S., Booker, H. E., & Hosokawa, K. Alpha enhancement: Due to feedback or the nature of the task?Psychophysiology 1971,8 262–263.Google Scholar
  5. Engstrom, D. R., London, P., & Hart, J. T. Hypnotic susceptibility increased by EEG alpha training.Nature 1970,227 1261–1262.Google Scholar
  6. Etevenon, P., Henrotte, J. G., & Verdeaux, G. Approche methodologique de états de conscience modifiés volontairement.Revue E. E. G., Paris 1972,3 232–237.Google Scholar
  7. Gannon, L., & Sternbach, R. A. Alpha enhancement as a treatment for pain: A case study.Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1971,2 209–213.Google Scholar
  8. Hardt, J. V. Alpha EEG responses of low and high anxiety males to respiration and relaxation training and to auditory feedback of occipital alpha.Dissertation Abstracts, International, 1974,35(4), Catalog No. 74-19309.Google Scholar
  9. Hirai, T.Psychophysiology of Zen, Tokyo: Igaku Shoin, 1974.Google Scholar
  10. Honorton, C., Davidson, R., & Bindler, P. Shifts in subjective state associated with feedback-augmented EEG alpha.Psychophysiology 1972,9 269–270.Google Scholar
  11. Hord, D., & Barber, J. Alpha control: Effectiveness of two kinds of feedback.Psychonomic Science 1971,25 151–154.Google Scholar
  12. Kamiya, J. Self regulation as an aid to human effectiveness. Progress report on Office of Naval Research Contract No. N0014-70-C-0350, Washington, D.C.: May 15, 1971.Google Scholar
  13. Mulholland, T. B. Can you really turn on with alpha?The R.M. Bucke Memorial Society Newsletter Review 1972,5(1&2), 32–40.Google Scholar
  14. Paskewitz, D. A., & Orne, M. T. The effect of cognitive tasks on the feedback control of alpha activity.Psychophysiology 1971,8 263.Google Scholar
  15. Paskewitz, D. A., & Orne, M. T. Visual effects on alpha feedback training.Science 1973,181 360–363.Google Scholar
  16. Peper, E., & Mulholland, T. B. Methodological and theoretical problems in the voluntary control of electroencephalographic occipital alpha by the subject. InBiofeedback and Self-Control 1970. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1971.Google Scholar
  17. Podlesney, J. A., & Raskin, D. C. Biofeedback: A failure to enhance alpha EEG.Proceedings of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Galveston, October 1973.Google Scholar
  18. Travis, T. A., Kondo, C. Y., & Knott, J. R. Alpha conditioning: A controlled study.The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1974,158 163–173. (a)Google Scholar
  19. Travis, T. A., Kondo, C. Y., & Knott, J. R. Personality variables and alpha enhancement: A correlative study.British Journal of Psychiatry 1974,124 542–544. (b)Google Scholar
  20. Travis, T. A., Kondo, C. Y., & Knott, J. R. Parameters of eyes-closed alpha enhancement.Psychophysiology 1974,11 674–681. (c)Google Scholar
  21. Walsh, D. H. Effects of instructional set, reinforcement and individual differences in EEG alpha feedback training.Proceedings of the Biofeedback Research Society, Boston, November 1972.Google Scholar
  22. Walsh, D. H. Interactive effects of alpha feedback and instructional set on subjective state.Psychophysiology 1974,11 428–435.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • James V. Hardt
    • 1
  • Joe Kamiya
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric InstituteUniversity of California at San FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations