, Volume 94, Issue 3, pp 279–306 | Cite as

Classification of amphipod compound eyes — The fine structure of the ommatidial units (Crustacea, Amphipoda)

  • Eric Hallberg
  • Heimo L. Nilsson
  • Rolf Elofsson


The ultrastructure of the compound eyes of 13 amphipod species has been investigated. An amphipod type of compound eye can be characterized by the constellation and consistency of a number of morphological features, most of which are also found in other compound eyes. The amphipod eye falls into four sub-categories (types). The ampeliscid type has a tripartite aberrant lens eye; the lysianassid type has a reduced or no dioptric apparatus and a hypertrophied rhabdom; the hyperid type possesses a large number of ommatidial units with long crystalline cones and dark instead of reflecting accessory pigment; and finally, the gammarid type can be interpreted as a generalized amphipod type. The lysianassid type is adapted to low light intensities and demonstrates convergent development with the compound eyes of other deep-sea crustaceans. The ampeliscid type is more similar to the gammarid type. The type characterization of the amphipod compound eye might well serve as a basis and incentive for functional studies also revealing adaptational mechanisms.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ball, E.E.: Fine structure of the compound eyes of the midwater amphipodPhronima in relation to behaviour and habitat. Tissue Cell9, 521–536 (1977)Google Scholar
  2. Debaisieux, P.: Les yeux des crustacés. Cellule50, 9–122 (1944)Google Scholar
  3. Delia Valle, A.: Gammarini. Fauna Flora Golfes Neapel20, 1–948 (1893)Google Scholar
  4. Donner, K.O.: On vision inPontoporeia affinis andP. femorata (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Comments Biol.41, 1–17 (1971)Google Scholar
  5. Edwards, A.S.: The structure of the eye ofLigia oceanica L. Tissue Cell1, 217–228 (1969)Google Scholar
  6. Eguchi, E., Waterman, T.H.: Fine structure patterns in crustacean rhabdoms. In: The functional organization of the compound eye. (C.G. Bernhard, ed.), pp. 105–124. London: Pergamon Press 1966Google Scholar
  7. Elofsson, R.: Rhabdom adaptation and its phylogenetic significance. Zool. Scr.5, 97–101 (1976)Google Scholar
  8. Elofsson, R., Hallberg, E.: Correlation of ultrastructure and chemical composition of crustacean chromatophore pigment. J. Ultrastruct. Res.44, 421–429 (1973)Google Scholar
  9. Elofsson, R., Hallberg, E.: Compound eyes of some deep-sea and fiord mysid crustaceans. Acta Zool. Stockholm58, 169–177 (1977)Google Scholar
  10. Elofsson, R., Odselius, R.: The anostracan rhabdom and the basement membrane. An ultrastructural study of theArtemia compound eye (Crustacea). Acta Zool. Stockholm56, 141–153 (1975)Google Scholar
  11. Ercolini, A.: Sulla struttura degli occhi composti diTalitrus saltator Montagu (Crustacea — Amphipoda). Redia49, 129–135 (1965)Google Scholar
  12. Hallberg, E.: The fine structure of the compound eyes of mysids (Crustacea: Mysidacea). Cell Tissue Res.184, 45–65 (1977)Google Scholar
  13. Hanström, B.: Neue Untersuchungen über Sinnesorgane und Nervensystem der Crustaceen II. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Anat. Ontog. Tiere56, 387–520 (1933)Google Scholar
  14. Karnovsky, M.J.: A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol.27, 137A-138A (1965)Google Scholar
  15. Kunze, P.: Histologische Untersuchungen zum Bau des Auges vonOcypode cursor (Brachyura). Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat.82, 466–478 (1967)Google Scholar
  16. Laughlin, S.B., Menzel, R., Snyder, A.W.: Membranes, dichroism and receptor sensitivity. In: Photoreceptor optics (A.W. Snyder and R. Menzel, eds.), pp. 237–262. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1975Google Scholar
  17. Meyer-Rochow, V.B.: Larval and adult eye of the western rock lobster(Panulirus longipes). Cell Tissue Res.162, 439–457 (1975)Google Scholar
  18. Meyer-Rochow, V.B.: The eyes of mesopelagic curstaceans. II.Streetsia challngeri (Amphipoda). Cell Tissue Res.186, 337–349 (1978)Google Scholar
  19. Michel, A., Anders, F.: Über die Pigmente im Auge vonGammarus pulex L. Naturwissenschaften41, 72 (1954)Google Scholar
  20. Nässel, D.R.: The retina and retinal projection on the lamina ganglionaris of the crayfishPacifastacus leniusculus (Dana). J. Comp. Neur.167, 341–360 (1976)Google Scholar
  21. Nemanic, P.: Fine structure of the compound eye ofPorcellio scaber in light and dark adaptation. Tissue Cell7, 453–468 (1975)Google Scholar
  22. Nilsson, H.L.: The fine structure of the compound eyes of shallow-water asellotes,Jaera albifrons Leach andAsellus aquaticus L. (Crustacea: Isopoda). Acta Zool. Stockholm59, 69–84 (1978)Google Scholar
  23. Parker, G.H.: The compound eyes in crustaceans. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv. Univ.21, 45–140 (1891)Google Scholar
  24. Richardson, K.C., Jarret, L., Finke, E.H.: Embedding in epoxy resins for ultrathin sectioning in electron microscopy. Stain Technol.35, 313–323 (1960)Google Scholar
  25. Sars, G.O.: An account of the Crustacea of Norway, Vol. 1. Amphipoda. Christiania-Copenhagen: Alb. Cammermeyer 1895Google Scholar
  26. Schellenberg, A.: Amphipoda des nordischen Plankton. In: Nordisches Plankton III, pp. 589–722. Kiel-Leipzig: Lipsius & Tischer 1927Google Scholar
  27. Stephensen, K.: Storkrebs II. Ringkrebs 1. Tanglopper (amphipoder). København: G.E.C. Gad 1928Google Scholar
  28. Strauss, E., Das Gammaridenauge. Wiss. Ergebn. dt. Tiefsee-Exped. Valdivia.20, 1–84 (1926)Google Scholar
  29. Svensson, E.: Über die Augen und das Gehirn vonHaploops tubicola Lilj. Ark. Zool.25A/18, 1–15 (1933)Google Scholar
  30. Wimpenny, R.S.: The plankton of the sea. London: Faber and Faber 1966Google Scholar
  31. Woltereck, R.: Die Hyperiidea Gammaroidea. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. Univ.52, 145–168 (1909)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Hallberg
    • 1
  • Heimo L. Nilsson
    • 1
  • Rolf Elofsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of LundLundSweden

Personalised recommendations