Advertisement

Journal of World Prehistory

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 97–143 | Cite as

The Neolithic of the eastern Baltic

  • Rimutė Rimantienė
Article

Abstract

This survey of the Baltic Neolithic, from Vistula to the Gulf of Finland, highlights the results of research during the last 30 years. The primary Baltic Neolithic is represented by two indigenous cultures, Narva and Nemunas. Their hunting, fishing, and gathering subsistence strategies gradually expanded to include domesticated plants and animals. The Comb-and-Pit Ornamented Pottery, Globular Amphora, Corded Ware, Bay Coast, and Boat-Axe cultures are also described. Within the Baltic Neolithic, I emphasize the origin, technology, economy, settlement, ritual, ethnic origins, and relationships among the various Neolithic populations. There is then a discussion of the origin of the Baltic linguistic group (Latvian, Lithuanian, and Old Prussian); this is associated with the appearance of the Late Neolithic Corded Ware culture, whose people integrated with local populations, leading to the development of the Bay Coast culture. Late Neolithic developments are associated with the Finno-Ugrian linguistic group in the northern Baltic.

Key words

Neolithic Baltic linguistic groups Lithuania Latvia Estonia Narva Nemunas Comb-and-Pit Ornamented Pottery Bay Coast culture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ariste, F. (1971). Die ältesten Substrate in den ostseefinnischen Sprachen.Sovetskoye finnougrovedeniye, VII, Tallinn.Google Scholar
  2. Benecke, B. (1881).Fische, Fischerei und Fischzucht in Ost-und Westpreussen, Königsberg.Google Scholar
  3. Bohnsack, D. (1939). Ein Steinzeitgrab mit Röttelbestattung aus Braynicken, Kr. Neidenburg.Altpreussen 4(2): 35–38.Google Scholar
  4. Buchvaldek, M. (1986). Kultura se šnůrovou keramikou ve středni Evropě.Praehistorica 12 127–139.Google Scholar
  5. Burow, G. M. (1973). Die mesolithischen Kulturen im aussersten europäischen Nordosten. In Kozłowski, S. K. (ed.),The Mesolithic in Europe, University Press, Warsaw, pp. 129–149.Google Scholar
  6. Butrimas, A. (1982).Daktariškės neolito gyvenvietė, Vilnius.Google Scholar
  7. Butrimas, A. (1985). Duonkalnis: vėlyvojo neolito gyvenvietė, alkas ir kapinynas. Archeologiniai tyrimai.Lietuvos Archeologija 4 30–49.Google Scholar
  8. Butrimas, A. (1990). Virvelinės keramikos kultūru, Vilnius.Google Scholar
  9. Butrimas, A., and Kazakevičius, V. (1985). Ankstyvieji virvelinės keramikos kultūros kapai Lietuvoje. Archeologiniai tyrimai.Lietuvos Archeologija 4 14–19.Google Scholar
  10. Charn'auski, M. M. (1979).Nealit Belaruskaga Panyamonnya (The Neolithic of the Byelorussian Nemunas Basin), Minsk.Google Scholar
  11. Charn'avskiy, M. M. (1978). Khronologicheskiye ramki neolita v severo-zapadnoy Belorussii (Neolithic chronology of the northwestern Byelorussia).Kratkiye Soobshcheniya Instituta Arkheologii 153 42–46.Google Scholar
  12. Charn'avskiy, M. M. (1987). The Neolithic in north-west Byelorussia. In Wiślański, T. (ed.), Neolit i poczNeolit i poczaski epoki brazu na ziemi Chelminskiej, Museum and University of Mikołaj Kopernik, Toruń, pp. 429–439.Google Scholar
  13. Česnys, G. (1985a). Ankstyvieji virvelinės keramikos kultūros kapai Lietuvoje. Antropologiniai tyrimai.Lietuvos Archeologija 4 19–22.Google Scholar
  14. Česnys, G. (1985b). Duonkalnis: velyvojo neolito gyvenvietė, alkas ir kapinynas. Antropologiniai tyrimai.Lietuvos Archeologija 4 49–56.Google Scholar
  15. Česnys, G. (1987). Baltu susidarymas antropologijos poziūriu susidarymas antropologijos požiūriu. In Volkaitė-Kulikauskienė, R. (ed.), Lietuviu etnogenezė, Mokslas, Vilnius, pp. 69–75.Google Scholar
  16. Denisova, R. J. (1975).Antropologiya drevnikh baltov (Physical Anthropology of the Ancient Balts), Riga.Google Scholar
  17. Ehrlich, B. (1936). Succase.Elbinger Jahrbuch 12/13 41–98.Google Scholar
  18. Ehrlich, B. (1941). Schnurkeramische Pfostenhäuser bei Tolkemit, Kr. Elbing.Mannus 32 44–56.Google Scholar
  19. Engel, C. (1933). Die ostpreussischen Megalithgräber.Fornvännen 1–2 85–90.Google Scholar
  20. Engel, C. (1935).Vorgeschichte der altpreussischen Stämme, Königsberg.Google Scholar
  21. Gaerte, W. (1927).Die steinzeitliche Keramik Ostpreussens, Königsberg.Google Scholar
  22. Gaerte, W. (1929).Urgeschichte Ostpreussens, Königsberg.Google Scholar
  23. Gardawski, A. (1958). Zagadnienie kultury “ceramiki grzebykowej” w Polsce.Wiadomości Archeologiczne 25(4): 287–313.Google Scholar
  24. Gimbutas, M. (1956).The Prehistory of Eastern Europe, Peabody Museum, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Gimbutas, M. (1963).The Balts, Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
  26. Girininkas, A. (1985a). Kretuono l-os gyvenvietés vidurinio neolito kapai.Lietuvos Archeologija 4 5–9.Google Scholar
  27. Girininkas, A. (1985b). Narvos kultūros raida.Lietuvos Archeologija 4 119–134.Google Scholar
  28. Girininkas, A. (1987). Neoliticheskiye stroitelniye sooruzheniya v Litve (Neolithic building construction in Lithuania). InZadachi sovetskoy arkheologii v svete resheniy XXVII s'ezda KPSS, Moscow, pp. 74–75.Google Scholar
  29. Girininkas, A. (1988). Pakretuonės 3-čia gyvenvietė. InArcheologiniai tyrinėjimai Lietuvoje 1986 ir 1987 metais, Lietuvos TSR Mokslu Akademijos Istorijos Institutas, Vilnius, pp. 7–10.Google Scholar
  30. Girininkas, A. (1990). Kretuonas. Srednij i pozdnij neolit (Kretuonas: Middle and Late Neolithic).Lietuvos Archeologija 7, Mokslas, Vilnius.Google Scholar
  31. Gurina, N. N. (1956). Oleneostrovskiy mogil'nik (The Oleneostrovskiy cemetery),Materiali i Issledovaniya po Arkheologii SSSR, 47, Moscow-Leningrad.Google Scholar
  32. Gurina, N. N. (1967). Iz istorii drevnikh plemen zapadnikh oblastey SSSR (On the history of ancient tribes in the western districts of SSSR),Materiali i Issledovaniya po Arkheologii SSSR, 144, Moscow-Leningrad.Google Scholar
  33. Ilves, E., Lijva, A., and Punning, J. M. (1974).Radiouglerodniy metod i ego primeneniye v chetvertichnoy geologii i arkheologii Estonii (Radiocarbon dating method and its use in the quaternary geology and archaeology of Estonia), Tallinn.Google Scholar
  34. Indreko, R. (1948).Die mittlere Steinzeit in Estland, Kgl. Vitterhets Historie och Antiquitets Akademiens Handlingar, 66, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  35. Indreko, R. (1957). Idolanhanger-Amulet.Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistyksen Aikakauskirja 58 61–79.Google Scholar
  36. Isaenko, V. F. (1976).Neolit Pripyatskogo Polesya (The Neolithic of the Pripyat Polesie), Minsk.Google Scholar
  37. Jaanits, L. (1952). Pozdneneoliticheskiye mogil'niki v Estonskoy SSR (Late Neolithic cemeteries in Estonian SSR).Kratkiye soobshcheniya instituta istorii materialnoy kulturii 42 53–65.Google Scholar
  38. Jaanits, L. (1956). K voprosu ob etnicheskoy prinadlezhnosti neoliticheskogo naseleniya territorii Estonskoy SSR (A contribution to the ethnogenesis of the Neolithic people in the Estonian SSR). InVoprosi etnicheskoy istorii estonskogo naroda, Tallinn, pp. 153–161.Google Scholar
  39. Jaanits, L. (1957). Neue Gräberfunde auf dem spätneolithischen Wohnplatz Tamula in Estland.Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistyksen Aikakauskirja 58 80–100.Google Scholar
  40. Jaanits, L. (1959).Poseleniya epokhi neolita i rannego metalla v priust'e r. Emajogi (Neolithic and Early Metal Period Settlements at the Mouth of the Emajõgi River), Tallinn.Google Scholar
  41. Jaanits, L. (1965). Über die Ergebnisse der Steinzeitforschung in Sowjetestland.Finskt Museum 72 5–46.Google Scholar
  42. Jaanits, L. (1969). Die frühneolithische Kultur in Estland. InCongressus Secundus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum Helsinki, II, Helsinki, pp. 12–25.Google Scholar
  43. Jaanits, L. (1971). Über die estnischen Bootäxte von Karlova-Typus.Finskt Museum 77 46–76.Google Scholar
  44. Jaanits, L. (1984). Die kennzeichnenden Züge der Siedlung Tamula.ISKOS 4 183–193.Google Scholar
  45. Jaanits, L. (1985). Hat Estland im Neolithikum Verbindungen zu Schweden gehabt?Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis—Studia Baltica 1 17–38.Google Scholar
  46. Jaanits, L., Laul, S., Lõugas, V., and Tōnisson, E. (1982).Eesti Esiajalugu, Tallinn.Google Scholar
  47. Jankauskas, R. (1985). Duonkalnis: vėlyvojo neolito gyvenvietė, alkas ir kapinynas. Paleopatologiniai duomenys.Lietuvos Archeologija 4 58–61.Google Scholar
  48. Jankowska, D. (1980).Kultura pucharów lejkowatych na Pomorzu środkowym, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Google Scholar
  49. Juodagalvis, V. (1991). Kubilėliu vėlyvojo neolito gyvenvietė.Lietuvos Archeologija 8 (in press).Google Scholar
  50. Kempisty, E. (1973a). Materiały tw. ceramiki grzebykowo-dołkowej z terenu Mazowsza i Podlasia.Wiadomości Archeologiczne 37(4): 411–483.Google Scholar
  51. Kempisty, E. (1973b). Kultura ceramiki “grzebykowo-dołkowej” na Mazowszu i Podlasiu.Wiadomości Archeologiczne 38(1): 3–76.Google Scholar
  52. Kempisty, E., and Sulgostowska, Z. (1976). Pierwsza osada neolityczna z ceramika typu Dubiczaj w północno-wschodniej Polsce.Wiadomości Archeologiczne 41(3): 305–324.Google Scholar
  53. Kernchen, I., and Gramsch, B. (1989). Mesolithische Netz-und Seilreste von Friesack, Bezirk Potsdam, und ihre Konservierung.Veröffentlichungen des Museums für Ur-und Frühgeschichte Potsdam 23 23–27.Google Scholar
  54. Kilian, L. (1938). Neuere Funde ältester Irdenware aus Ostpreussen.Altpreussen 3(3): 85–89.Google Scholar
  55. Kilian, L. (1955).Haffküstenkultur und Ursprung der Balten, Rudolf Habelt, Bonn.Google Scholar
  56. Klebs, R. (1882).Der Bernsteinschmuck der Steinzeit, Königsberg.Google Scholar
  57. Klein, J., Lerman, J. C., Damon, P. E., and Ralph, E. K. (1982). Calibration of radiocarbon dates. Tables based on the consensus data of the workshop on calibrating the radiocarbon time scale.Radiocarbon 24(2): 103–130.Google Scholar
  58. Krzak, L. (1976).The Złota Culture, Ossolineum, Wrocław.Google Scholar
  59. Kulikauskas, P., Kulikauskienė, R., and Tautavičius, A. (1961).Lietuvos archeologijos bruožai, Vilnius.Google Scholar
  60. La Baume, W. (1943). Jungsteinzeitliche Kugelamphorenkultur in Ost-und Westpreussen.Prussia 35 13–80.Google Scholar
  61. Larsen, H. (1923). Bronsåldersplogen från Svarvarbo.Fornvännen 24(3): 177–180.Google Scholar
  62. Loze, I. (1975). Neolithic amber ornaments in the eastern part of Latvia. Przeglad Archeologiczny23 49–82.Google Scholar
  63. Loze, I. (1978). Neolita celtņu vietas Austrumbaltijā.Arheologija un etnogrāfija 12 7–23.Google Scholar
  64. Loze, I. (1979).Pozdniy neolit i ranniya bronza Lubanskoy ravnini (The Late Neolithic and the Early Bronze Age of the Lubāna Lowland), Riga.Google Scholar
  65. Loze, I. (1983).Akmens laikmeta māksla Austrumbaltijā, Riga.Google Scholar
  66. Loze, I. (1988).Poseleniya kamennogo veka Lubanskoy nizini. Mezolit, ranniy i sredniy neolit (The Stone Age Sites of the Lubana Lowland. Mesolithic, Early and Middle Neolithic), Zinātne, Riga.Google Scholar
  67. Machnik, J. (1979). Krag kultury ceramiki sznurowej. In Hensel, W., and Wiślański, T. (eds.),Prahistoria Ziem Polskich, II, Neolit, Ossolineum, Wrocław, pp. 337–411.Google Scholar
  68. Mark, K. (1956). Voprosi etnicheskoy istorii estonskogo naroda v svete dannikh paleoantropologii (Questions concerning the ethnic history of the Estonian people based on palaeoanthropological evidence). InVoprosi etnicheskoy istorii estonskogo naroda, Tallinn, pp. 219–242.Google Scholar
  69. Mark, K. (1970).Zur Herkunft der finnisch-ugrischen Völker vom Standpunkt der Anthropologie, Tallinn.Google Scholar
  70. Meurers-Balke, J. (1981). Steinzeitliche Aalstecher. Zur funktionelen Deutung einer Holzgerätform.Offa 38 131–151.Google Scholar
  71. Müller-Beck, J. (1965).Seeberg, Burgäschisee-Süd, Teil 5: Holzgeräte und Holzverarbeitung, Acta Bernensia 2, Bern.Google Scholar
  72. Okulicz, J. (1973).Pradzieje ziem Pruskich od późnego paleolitu do VI w.n.e., Ossolineum, Wrocław.Google Scholar
  73. Paaver, L. K. (1965).Formirovaniye teriofauni i izmenchivost' mlekopotayushchikh Pribaltiki v golocene (Origin and variability of mammals in the east Baltic area during the Holocene), Tartu.Google Scholar
  74. Pälsi, S. (1920). Ein steinzeitlicher Moorfund bei Korpilahti im Kirchspiel Antrea, Län Wiborg.Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistyksen Aikakauskirja 28(2): 3–19.Google Scholar
  75. Raschke, G. (1938). Mattenabdrücke auf Jungsteinzeitlichen Tongeräten von Succase, Kreis Elbing.Elbinger Jahrbuch 15 39–44.Google Scholar
  76. Rimantienė, R. (1971).Paleolit i mezolit Litvi (The Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Lithuania), Vilnius.Google Scholar
  77. Rimantienė, R. (1979).Šventoji, 1, Narvos kultūros gyvenvietės, Mokslas, Vilnius.Google Scholar
  78. Rimantienė, R. (1980). Šventoji, 2, Pamariu kultūros gyvenvietès, Mokslas, Vilnius.Google Scholar
  79. Rimantienė, R. (1981). Anteil mesolithischer Typenformen an den Fundkomplexen der neolithischen Neman-Kultur.Veröfentlichungen des Museums für Ur-und Frühgeschichte Potsdam 14/15 177–182.Google Scholar
  80. Rimantienė, R. (1984).Akmens amžius Lietuvoje, Mokslas, Vilnius.Google Scholar
  81. Rimantienė, R. (1985). Lynupio akmens amžiaus stovykla ir gyvenvietė.Lietuvos Archeologija 4 98–111.Google Scholar
  82. Rimantienė, R. (1987). Prabaltai ir baltai. Archeologinės kultūros. In Volkaitė-Kulikauskienė, R. (ed.), Lietuviu etnogenezè, Mokslas, Vilnius, pp. 52–69.Google Scholar
  83. Rimantienė, R. (1989). Nida. Senuju baltu gyvenvietè, Mokslas, Vilnius.Google Scholar
  84. Schall, H. (1964). Baltische Dialekte im Namengut Nordwest-slawiens.Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 79 123–170.Google Scholar
  85. Schall, H. (1970). Preussische Namen längs der Weichsel. In Donum Balticum, Stockholm-Uppsala, pp. 448–484.Google Scholar
  86. Siiriainen, A. (1973). Studies relating to shore displacement and stone age chronology in Finland.Finskt Museum 80 5–22.Google Scholar
  87. Slaski, J. (1950). Łużyckie wyroby drewniane z Biskupina. In Kostrzewski, J. (ed.),III sprawozdanie z prac wykopaliskowych w grodzie kultury łużyckiej w Biskupinie w powiecie żnińskim za lata 1938–1939; 1946–1948, Poznań, pp. 160–171.Google Scholar
  88. Sloka, J. J. (1975). Ribi iz stoyanok kamennogo veka na Lubanskoy izmenosti (Fish from the Stone Age site of Lubāna). Latvijas PSR Zinātnu Akadēmijas Vēstis8(337):65–73.Google Scholar
  89. Sloka, J. (1986). Zivis Zvidzes mezolita un neolita apmetne.Latvijas PSR Zinātņu Akādemijas Vēstis 9 127–130.Google Scholar
  90. Stadie, K. (1921). Die steinzeitdörfer der Zedmar. InFestschrift Adalbert Bezzenberger, Göttingen, pp. 148–160.Google Scholar
  91. Struve, K. (1955).Die Einzelgrabkulturen in Schleswig-Holstein und ihre kontinentalen Beziehungen, Wachholz, Neumünster.Google Scholar
  92. Šturms, E. (1931). Ein steinzeitlicher Wohnplatz am Zebrus-See in Kurzeme. InCongressus Secundus Archaeologorum Balticorum Rigae 1930, Riga, pp. 411–420.Google Scholar
  93. Šturms, E. (1937). Neolita apmetne Dundagas Purciemā.Senātne un Māksla 1 46–54.Google Scholar
  94. Šturms, E. (1940). Sārnates purva mitnes. Sentne un Mkāsla1 41–64.Google Scholar
  95. Šturms, E. (1948). Die Moorsiedlungen im Ostbaltikum und Westsibirien.Fornvännen 43 362–364.Google Scholar
  96. Šturms, E. (1956). Der Bernsteinschmuck der östlichen Amphorenkultur.Rheinische Forschungen zur Vorgeschichte 5 13–20.Google Scholar
  97. Šturms, E. (1970).Die steinzeitlichen Kulturen des Balticums, Bonn.Google Scholar
  98. Tetzlaff, W. (1970). The Rzucewo Culture. In Wiślański, T. (ed.),The Neolithic in Poland, Ossolineum, Wrocław, pp. 356–365.Google Scholar
  99. Timofeev, V. I. (1979). Pam'yatniki kamennogo veka vostochnoy chasti Kalingradskoy oblasti (Stone Age settlements in the eastern part of the Kaliningrad district).Kratkiye Soobshcheniya Instituta Arkheologii 157 61–69.Google Scholar
  100. Timofeev, V. I. (1980).Neoliticheskiye pam'yatniki Kalinigradskoy oblasti i ikh mesto v neolite Pribaltiki (Neolithic sites in the Kaliningrad district and their position in the east Baltic Neolithic), Avtoreferat dizertatsii, Leningrad.Google Scholar
  101. Timofeev, V. I. (1981). Izdeliya iz kosti i roga neoliticheskoy stoyanki Tsedmar (Serovo) D (Bone and antler tools from the Neolithic site of Zedmar (Serovo) D).Kratkiye Soobshcheniya Istituta Arkheologii 165 115–119.Google Scholar
  102. Timofeev, V. I. (1983). Keramika neoliticheskogo poseleniya Utinoye Boloto 1 (Ceramics of the Neolithic settlement of the Utinoye Boloto 1).Kratkiye Soobshcheniya Instituta Arkheologii 173 103–108.Google Scholar
  103. Timofeev, V. I. (1988). On the problem of the early neolithic of the East Baltic area.Acta Archaeologica 58 207–212.Google Scholar
  104. Toporov, V. N. (1966). O baltiiyskikh elementakh v gidronimii i toponimii k zapadu ot Wisli (On Baltic elements in the river and place names west of the Vistula).Slavica Pragensia 8 255–263.Google Scholar
  105. Toporov, V. N. (1982). Noviye roboti o sledakh prebivaniya prussov k zapadu ot Wisli (New research about traces of ancient Prussian presence west of the Vistula). InBalto-slavyanskiye issledovaniya, pp. 263–273.Google Scholar
  106. Vanagas, A. (1987). Baltu arcalas toponimijos duomenimis. In Volkaitė-Kulikauskienė, R. (ed.), Lietuviu etnogenezè, Mokslas, Vilnius, p. 47.Google Scholar
  107. Vankina, L. (1970).Torf'yanikovaya stoyanka Sarnate (The peat bog site of Sārnate), Zinātne, Riga.Google Scholar
  108. Wiślański, T. (1966).Kultura amfor kulistych w Polsce północno-zachodniej, Ossolineum, Wrocław.Google Scholar
  109. Wiślański, T. (1969).Podstawy gospodarcze plemion neolitycznych w Polsce północno-zachodniej, Ossolineum, Wrocław.Google Scholar
  110. Wiślański, T. (1970). The globular amphora culture. In Wiślański, T. (ed.),The Neolithic in Poland, Ossolineum, Wrocław, pp. 178–231.Google Scholar
  111. Wiślański, T. (1979). Krag ludów subneolityczych w Polsce. In Hensel, W., and Wiślański, T. (eds.),Prahistoria Ziem Polskich, II, Neolit, Ossolineum, Wrocław, pp. 319–336.Google Scholar
  112. Wieckowska, H. and Kempisty, E. (1970). Wstepne wyniki badań wykopaliskowych w Sośni, pow. Grajewo.Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 22 17–30.Google Scholar
  113. Zagorska, I. (1977). Viengabala kaula makšķeres āķi Latvijā.Latvijas PSR Zinātņu Akadēmijas Vēstis 8(361): 85–102.Google Scholar
  114. Zagorskis, F. (1961). Kreiču neolita kapulauks.Arheologija un etnogrāfija 3 3–18.Google Scholar
  115. Zagorskis, F. (1965). Jauni materiāli par neolitu Latvijās austrumdaļā.Latvijas PSR Zinātnu Akadēmijas Vēstis 6(215): 35–50.Google Scholar
  116. Zagorskis, F. (1973). Agrais neolīta laikmets Latvijās austrumdaļā.Latvijas PSR Zinātnu Akadēmijas Vēstis 4(309): 56–96.Google Scholar
  117. Zagorskis, F. (1974). Zvejnieku akmens laikmets kapulauka apbedijumu tipologija un hronologija.Arheologija un etnogrāfija 11 7–24.Google Scholar
  118. Zagorskis, F. (1987).Zvejnieku akmens laikmeta kapulauks, Riga.Google Scholar
  119. Żurek, J. (1955). Osada z młodszej epoki kamiennej w Rzucewie, pow. wejherowski, i kultura rzucewska.Fontes Archaeologici Posnanienses 4 1–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rimutė Rimantienė
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Lithuanian HistoryLithuanian Academy of SciencesVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations