Abstract
In this paper Popper formulates and discusses a new aspect of the theory of mind. This theory is partly based on his earlier developed interactionistic theory. It takes as its point of departure the observation that mind and physical forces have several properties in common, at least the following six: both are (i) located, (ii) unextended, (iii) incorporeal, (iv) capable of acting on bodies, (v) dependent upon body, (vi) capable of being influenced by bodies. Other properties such as intensity and extension in time may be added. It is argued that a fuller understanding of the nature of forces is essential for the analysis of the mind-brain problem. The relative autonomy and indeterministic nature of mind is stressed. Indeterminism is treated in relation to a theorem of Hadamard. The computer theory of mind and the Turing test are criticized. Finally the evolution of mind is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Popper KR, Eccles JC.The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1977.
Popper KR.Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon, 1972.
Popper KR.Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. London: Fontana/Collins, 1976.
Wächtershäuser G. Pyrite formation, the first energy source for life: a hypothesis.Systematic and Applied Microbiology 1988;10:207–10.
Wächtershäuser G. Before enzymes and templates: theory of surface metabolism.Microbiol Rev 1988;52:452–84.
Wächtershäuser G. Groundworks for an evolutionary biochemistry: the iron-sulphur world.Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1992;58:85–201.
Popper KR. Pyrite and the origin of life.Nature 1990;344:387.
Nagel T. What is it like to be a bat?The Philosophical Review 1974;83:435–50.
Ryle G.The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson, 1949.
Popper KR.The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism. London: Hutchinson, 1982.
Hadamard J. Les surfaces à courbures opposées et leurs lignes géodésiques.Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 1898;4:27–73.
Popper KR. Indeterminism in quantum physics and in classical physics, part I.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1950;1:117–33.
Popper KR. Indeterminism in quantum physics and in classical physics, part II.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1950;1:173–95.
Turing AM. Computing machinery and intelligence.Mind 1950;59:433–60.
Searle JR. Minds, brains, and programs.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1980;3:417–24.
Searle JR.The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1992.
Popper KR. Language and the body-mind problem. A restatement of interactionism.Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Philosophy. Vol. 7. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1953:101–7.
Popper KR.Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1963.
Bondi H. The philosopher for science.Nature 1992;358:363.
Skoyles JR. Popper: success or failure?Nature 1992;359:100.
Lindahl BIB, Welljams-Dorof A. Estimating Popper's impact.Nature 1992;360:204.
Bartley WW. A Popperian harvest. In: Levinson P, ed.In Pursuit of Truth: Essays on the Philosophy of Karl Popper on the Occasion of His 80th Birthday. New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1982:249–89.
Popper KR.In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years. London: Routledge, 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Popper, K.R., Lindahl, B.I.B. & Århem, P. A discussion of the mind-brain problem. Theor Med Bioeth 14, 167–180 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00997274
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00997274