Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 141–153

Vocal attractiveness and vocal babyishness: Effects on stranger, self, and friend impressions

  • Diane S. Berry
Article

Abstract

Ratings of the attractiveness and babyishness of the voices of 124 stimulus persons were obtained. These were compared to impressions provided by judges on the basis of vocal information only; self-descriptions provided by the stimulus persons; and descriptions of the stimulus persons provided by close friends. The vocal attractiveness stereotype was generally replicated, and the effects of vocal attractiveness and babyishness on impressions were found to be independent of one another. Sex differences in the impact of vocal attractiveness on perceptions were also revealed. Analyses did not reveal an impact of vocal attractiveness on self or friend ratings.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Addington, D.W. (1968). The relationship of selected vocal characteristics to personality perception.Speech Monographys, 35, 492–503.Google Scholar
  2. Albright, L., Kenny, D.A., & Malloy, T.E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387–395.Google Scholar
  3. Alley, T.R., & Hildebrant, K.A. (1988). Determinants and consequences of facial aesthetics. In T.R. Alley (Ed.),Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, D.S. (1990a). What can a moving face tell us?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1004–1014.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, D.S. (1990b). Attractive faces are not all created equal: Joint effects of facial babyishness and attractiveness on social perception.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, in press.Google Scholar
  6. Berry, D.S. (1990c).Taking people at face value: Evidence for the kernel of truth hypothesis. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, D.S. (1990d).Accuracy in social perception: Contributions of facial and vocal information. Manuscript under editorial review.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, D.S., & Brownlow, S. (1989). Were the physiognomists right? Personality correlates of facial babyishness.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 266–279.Google Scholar
  9. Berry, D.S., & McArthur, L.Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception.Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3–18.Google Scholar
  10. Broverman, I.K., Vogel, S.R., Broverman, D.M., Clarkson, F.E., & Rosenkrantz, P.S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal.Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.Google Scholar
  11. Gillen, B. (1981). Physical attractiveness as a determinant of two types of goodness.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 277–281.Google Scholar
  12. Goldman, W., & Lewis, P. (1977). Beautiful is good: Evidence that the physically attractive are more socially skillful.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 125–130.Google Scholar
  13. Heilman, M., & Saruwatari, L. (1979). When beauty is beastly.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360–372.Google Scholar
  14. Langlois, J.H. (1986). From the eye of the beholder to behavioral reality: Development of social behaviors and social relations as a function of physical attractiveness. In C.P. Herman, M.P. Zanna, & E.T. Higgins (Eds.),Physical appearance, stigma, and social behavior, V 3, (pp. 23–52). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Montepare, J.M., & Vega, C. (1988). Woman's vocal reactions to intimate and casual friends.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 103–113.Google Scholar
  16. Montepare, J.M., & Zebrowitz-McArthur, L. (1987). Perceptions of adults with childlike voices in two cultures.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 331–349.Google Scholar
  17. Morse, S.J., Reis, H.T., Gruzen, J., & Wolff, E. (1974). The ‘eye of the beholder’: Determinants of physical attractiveness judgments in the U.S. and South Africa.Journal of Personality, 42, 528–542.Google Scholar
  18. Rathus, S.A., (1973). A 30-item schedule for assessing assertive behavior.Behavior Therapy, 4 398–406.Google Scholar
  19. Reis, H.T., Nezlek, J., & Wheeler, L. (1980). Physical attractiveness in social interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 604–617.Google Scholar
  20. Reis, H.T., Wheeler, L., Spiegel, N., Kernis, M., Nezlek, J., & Perri, M. (1982). Physical attractiveness in social interaction II: Why does appearance affect social experience?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 979–996.Google Scholar
  21. Scherer, K.R. (1972). Judging personality from voice: A cross-cultural approach to an old issue in interpersonal perception.Journal of Personality, 40, 191–210.Google Scholar
  22. Siegman, A.W. (1987). The telltale voice: Nonverbal messages of verbal communication. In A.W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Nonverbal behavior and communication, (pp. 351–434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Snyder, M., Tanke, E.D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and social behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.Google Scholar
  24. Tellegen, A. (in press).The multidimensional personality questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Service.Google Scholar
  25. Watson, D. (1989). Strangers' ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of a surprising accuracy.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 120–128.Google Scholar
  26. Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R.E. (1989). What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 67–82.Google Scholar
  27. Zuckerman, M., Hodgins, H., & Miyake, K. (1990). The vocal attractiveness stereotype: Replication and elaboration.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 97–112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane S. Berry
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySouthern Methodist UniversityDallas

Personalised recommendations