Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 92–105 | Cite as

Psychotherapy and religion: The emmanuel movement

  • Katherine McCarthy


This paper reconsiders the significance of the Emmanuel movement, a pre- Freudian psychotherapeutic system founded by Dr. Elwood Worcester as a method of church-sponsored healing. Its significance lies in three areas: (1) Historically, it was a popular effort by Protestant clergy to claim religious authority over psychological and psychosomatic ailments, a struggle that the medical profession eventually won almost completely. (2) The Emmanuel movement was an effort to combat the scientific materialism and medical somaticism of its time, including the excessive use of drugs. It aimed at greater individual control over emotional wellbeing through a self-help movement taught by religious leaders using some Christian ideas. Significant parallels can be found with present-day holistic health efforts. (3) Theoretically, Worcester's conception of the “person” is of interest as an effort to construct a nonreductionist view of the interactions of body, mind, and spirit.


Medical Profession Individual Control Emotional Wellbeing Significant Parallel Religious Leader 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Powell, L.P.,The Emmanuel Movement in a New England Town. New York, G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1909, p. 53; Hale, N.G., Jr.,Freud and the Americans: The Beginnings of Psychoanalysis in the United States, 1876–1917. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker, R.S.,The Spiritual Unrest. New York, Frederick Stokes Co., 1910 (first published 1909), p. 240.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Worcester, E.,Life's Adventure: The Story of a Varied Career. New York, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1932, p. 283.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cabot, R.C., “New Phases in the Relation of the Church to Health,”The Outlook, Feb. 29, 1908,88, 9, 504–508.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    op. cit., p. 115.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Worcester, E., “The Results of the Emmanuel Movement: Women and Alcohol,”Ladies' Home Journal, Jan. 1909,26, 2, 15–16, 53.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Worcester, E., and McComb S.,Body, Mind and Spirit. Boston, Marshall Jones Co., 1931, p. 187.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yearbook of the Emmanuel Parish, Boston, “Report of the Jacoby Club,” 1910. Published by the Emmanuel Church, p. 48.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huber, R.M.,The American Idea of Success. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1971, p. 130.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibid., p. 124.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ibid., p. 131.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meyer, D.,The Positive Thinkers: Religion as Pop Psychology from Mary Baker Eddy to Oral Roberts. New York, Pantheon Books, 1980, p. 102; Braden, C.S.,Christian Science Today: Power, Policy and Practice. Dallas, Southern Methodist University Press, 1958, p. 283; Huber,op. cit., p. 143.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bettelheim, B.,Freud and Man's Soul. New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1983. [The problem here may have been carried through to a systematic misunderstanding of Freud's categories in English-speaking countries, according to recent work by Bruno Bettelheim.]Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Worcester, E., and McComb, S.,The Christian Religion as a Healing Power: A Defense and Exposition of the Emmanuel Movement. New York, Moffat, Yard and Co., 1909, Chapter 23.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Worcester and McComb,Body, Mind and Spirit, op. cit., pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McComb, S., “The Religio-Medical Movements; A Reply,”North American Review, 1909,189, 640, 445–454, 451.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Worcester, E.,Making Life Better: An Application of Religion and Psychology to Human Problems. New York, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1933, pp. 193–194.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Worcester and McComb,The Christian Religion as a Healing Power, op. cit. pp. 64–65.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Worcester,Making Life Better: An Application of Religion and Psychology to Human Problems, op. cit., p. 195.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    —, “The Results of the Emmanuel Movement: Women and Alcohol,”op. cit., p. 16.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Worcester and McComb,Body, Mind and Spirit, op. cit. p. 310.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ibid. p. 235.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ibid. pp. 68–70.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ibid. p. 122.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    op. cit., pp. 157–158, 314.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    op. cit., p. 93.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    op. cit., p. 241.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Worcester, E.; McComb, S.; and Coriat, I.,Religion and Medicine: The Moral Control of Nervous Disorders. New York, Moffat, Yard and Co., 1908, p. 176.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ibid., p. 148.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ibid., p. 160.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Worcester and McComb,The Christian Religion as a Healing Power, op. cit., pp. 64–65.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    McComb, S., “A Reply,”Hibbert Journal, Oct. 1909,8, 10–27, 18.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Worcester,Life's Adventure: The Story of a Varied Career, op. cit. p. 25.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    —,Making Life Better: An Application of Religion and Psychology to Human Problems, op. cit., p. 204.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Worcester and McComb,The Christian Religion as a Healing Power, op. cit., pp. 110–111.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ibid., p. 104.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    op. cit., p. 113.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    McCarthy, K., “Early Alcoholism Treatment: The Emmanuel Movement and Richard Peabody,” forthcoming,J. Studies on Alcohol.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Clinebell, H.J., Jr.,Understanding and Counseling the Alcoholic through Religion and Psychotherapy. Nashville, Abingdon Press, 1968, pp. 114–115.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Worceser, E.,The Allies of Religion. Boston, Marshall Jones Co., 1929, p. 185.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Worcester, “The Results of the Emmanuel Movement,” Part II,Ladies' Home Journal, 1908,25, 11, 7–8.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Worcester and McComb,Body, Mind and Spirit, op. cit., p. xvi.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hamilton, A.M., “The Religio-Medical Movements,”North American Review, 1909,189, 639, 225–226.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    op. cit., p. 227.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Worcester and McComb,The Christian Religion as a Healing Power, op. cit., pp. 50–51.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Worcester,Making Life Better, op. cit., p. 148.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    op. cit., p. 192.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Scherzer, C.J.,The Church and Healing. Philadelphia, The Westminster Press, 1950, p. 181.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cutten, G.B., “The Emmanuel Movement and the Church,”The Independent, 1908,65, 3130, 1228–1230, 1228.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Marshall, H.R., “Psycho-Therapeutics and Religion,”The Hibbert Journal, Jan. 1909,7, 2, 303–313.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    op. cit., p. 184.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Brown, C.R.,Faith and Health. New York, Thomas Y. Crowell Co., 1910, p. 162.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ibid., p. 150.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    H.R.M., “Christian Science and the Emmanuel Movement,”The Nation, June 25, 1908,86, 575. [Probably Henry Rutgers Marshall.]Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    op. cit., pp. 162–163.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Douglas A.,The Feminization of American Culture. New York, Avon, 1977.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    op. cit., pp. 229–231.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ibid., p. 229.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ibid., pp. 237–238.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cannon, I.,On the Social Frontier of Medicine: Pioneering in Medical Social Service. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    op. cit., p. 139.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ibid., p. 139.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Greene, J.G., “The Emmanuel Movement, 1906–1929,”The New England Quarterly, 1934,7, 3, 494–532, 516.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Boisen, A.T.,The Exploration of the Inner World: A Study of Mental Disorder and Religious Experience. New York, Harper and Brothers, 1936, p. 8.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hale, N.G., Jr., “Discussion.” In Gifford, G.E., Jr., ed.,Psychoanalysis, Psychotherapy, and the New England Medical Scene, 1894–1944. New York, Science History Publications/USA, 1978, p. 140.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Beers, C.W.,A Mind That Found Itself, An Autobiography. New York, Doubleday, Doran and Co., 1908.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institutes of Religion and Health 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine McCarthy
    • 1
  1. 1.Southern Connecticut State University in New HavenConnecticut

Personalised recommendations