Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 79–101 | Cite as

Self-esteem, evaluative feedback, and preacquaintance attraction: Indirect reactions to success and failure

  • Rick H. Hoyle
  • Chester A. Insko
  • Andrew J. Moniz
Article

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the indirect reactions of high-and low-self-esteem persons to evaluative feedback. Indirect reactions are defined as reactions to evaluative feedback directed toward individuals or mechanisms not associated with the feedback. In each experiment, a sample of college students divided according to level of dispositional self-esteem was provided with feedback on a bogus test of social intelligence. Subjects were informed that each of them had been paired randomly with another person in the session and would interact with that person later in the session. Prior to meeting the individual with whom each ostensibly had been paired, subjects indicated their evaluation of and attraction to those persons. In both experiments a cross-over pattern emerged due to greater attraction following success vs. failure feedback among low-self-esteem subjects and greater attraction following failure vs. success feedback among high-self-esteem subjects. This finding indicates an important new class of reactions to evaluative feedback, indirect reactions, that extends beyond the immediate context in which the feedback is received.

Keywords

College Student Social Psychology Social Intelligence Great Attraction Evaluative Feedback 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitkenhead, M. (1980). Consistency and self-enhancement: Coexistent or mutually exclusive?British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19 41–48.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1985). Self-esteem and responses to success and failure: Subsequent performance and intrinsic motivation.Journal of Personality, 53 450–467.Google Scholar
  3. Baumgardner, A. H. (1990). To know oneself is to like oneself: Self-certainty and self-affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 1062–1082.Google Scholar
  4. Baumgardner, A. H., Kaufman, C. M., & Levy, P. E. (1989). Regulating affect interpersonally: When low self-esteem leads to greater enhancement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56 907–921.Google Scholar
  5. Brockner, J. (1983). Low self-esteem and behavioral plasticity: Some implications. In L. Wheeler & P. Shaver (Eds.),Review of personality and social psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Brockner, J., Derr, W. R., & Laing, W. N. (1987). Self-esteem and reactions to negative feedback: Toward greater generalizability.Journal of Research in Personality, 21 318–333.Google Scholar
  7. Byrne, D. (1971).The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, D., Clore, G. L., & Smeaton, F. (1986). The attraction hypothesis: Do similar attitudes affect anything?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 1167–1170.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 538–549.Google Scholar
  10. Chapin, F. S. (1967).The Social Insight Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  11. Eagly, A. H. (1967). Involvement as a determinant of response to favorable and unfavorable information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 7 (Whole No. 643).Google Scholar
  12. Gibbons, F. X., & McCoy, S. B. (1991). Self-esteem, similarity, and reactions to active versus passive downward comparison.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 414–424.Google Scholar
  13. Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1985). Compensatory self-inflation: A response to the threat to self-regard of public failure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 273–280.Google Scholar
  14. Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). Short forms of the Texas Social Behavior Inventory (TSBI), an objective measure of self-esteem.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4 473–475.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, S. C. (1973). Self- and interpersonal evaluations: Esteem theories versus consistency theories.Psychological Bulletin, 79 185–199.Google Scholar
  16. Kernis, M. H., Brockner, J., & Frankel, B. S. (1989). Self-esteem and reactions to failure: The mediating role of overgeneralization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 707–714.Google Scholar
  17. LaPrelle, J., Hoyle, R. H., Insko, C. A., & Bernthal, P. (1990). Interpersonal attraction and descriptions of the traits of others: Ideal similarity, self similarity, and liking.Journal of Research in Personality, 24 216–240.Google Scholar
  18. Rossi, J. S. (1990). Statistical power of psychological research: What have we gained in 20 years?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58 646–656.Google Scholar
  19. Shrauger, J. S. (1975). Responses to evaluation as a function of initial self-perceptions.Psychological Bulletin, 82 581–596.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, R. H., & Insko, C. A. (1987). Social comparison choice during ability evaluation; The effects of comparison publicity, performance feedback, and self-esteem.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13 111–122.Google Scholar
  21. Swann, W. B., Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.),Psychological perspectives on the self. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Swann, W. B. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 1038–1051.Google Scholar
  23. Swann, W. B., Jr., Griffin, J. J., Jr., Predmore, S. C., & Gaines, B. (1987). The cognitive-affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 881–889.Google Scholar
  24. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rick H. Hoyle
    • 1
  • Chester A. Insko
    • 2
  • Andrew J. Moniz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, 208 Kastle HallUniversity of KentuckyLexington
  2. 2.University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUSA
  3. 3.University of KentuckyUSA

Personalised recommendations