Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 745–756

Extractable hydrocarbons and kin recognition in honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)

  • Robert E. PageJr.
  • Robert A. Metcalf
  • Robert L. Metcalf
  • Eric H. EricksonJr.
  • Richard L. Lampman
Article

Abstract

Hydrocarbons of worker honeybees of known pedigree were extracted and analyzed using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. Variability in hydrocarbon extracts of individual workers is determined at least in part genetically. Correlations in hydrocarbon composition of extracts were highest among more closely related individuals. Individuals maintained in groups exchange hydrocarbons but still maintain enough self-produced compounds to retain genetically determined individual characteristics. These results demonstrate that extractable hydrocarbons of bees provide sufficiently reliable genetic information to function as labels for use during kin recognition.

Key Words

Honeybee Apis mellifera Hymenoptera Apidae hydrocarbons kin recognition genetic relatedness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blomquist, G.J., Chu, A.J., andRamaley, S. 1980a. Biosynthesis of wax in the honeybee,Apis mellifera L.Insect Biochem. 10:313–321.Google Scholar
  2. Blomquist, G.J., Howard, R.W., McDaniel, C.A., andRamaley, S. 1980b. Application of methoxymercuration-demecuration followed by mass spectrometry as a convenient microanalytical technique for double-bond location in insect-derived alkenes,J. Chem. Ecol. 6:257–269.Google Scholar
  3. Breed, M.D. 1981. Individual recognition and learning of queen odors by worker honeybees.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:2635–2637.Google Scholar
  4. Breed, M.D. 1983. Nestmate recognition in honey bees.Anim. Behav. 31:86–91.Google Scholar
  5. Breed, M.D., andBennett, B. 1987. Kin recognition in highly eusocial insects, pp. 243–285,in D.J.C. Fletcher and C.D. Michener (eds.). Kin Recognition in Animals, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  6. Breed, M.D., Butler, L., andStiller, T.M. 1985. Learning and genetic influences in the discrimination of colony members by social Hymenoptera.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82:3058–3061.Google Scholar
  7. Breed, M.D., Stiller, T.M., andMoor, M.J. 1988a. The ontogeny of kin discrimination cues in the honey bee,Apis mellifera. Behav. Genet. 18:439–448.Google Scholar
  8. Breed, M.D., Williams, K.R., andFewell, J.H. 1988b. Comb wax mediates the acquisition of nest-mate recognition cues in honey bees.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85:8766–8769.Google Scholar
  9. Carlson, D.A. 1988. Africanized and European honey-bee drones and comb waxes: Analysis of hydrocarbon components for identification, pp. 264–274,in G.R. Needham, R.E. Page, M. Delfinado-Baker, and C.E. Bowman (eds.). Africanized Honey Bees and Bee Mites. Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester.Google Scholar
  10. Carlson, D.A., andBolton, A.B. 1984. Identification of Africanized and European honey bees using extracted hydrocarbons.Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 30:32–35.Google Scholar
  11. Clement, J.-L., Bonavita-Cougourdan, A., andLange, C. 1987. Nestmate recognition and cuticular hydrocarbons inCamponotus vagus Scop, pp. 473–474,in J. Eder and H. Rembold, (eds.). Chemistry and Biology of Social Insects. Verlag J. Peperny, Munich.Google Scholar
  12. Darwin, C.R. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. 1962. Collier Books Edition (6th ed.). Macmillan, New York. 512 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Errard, C., andFallon, J.-M. 1987. An investigation of the development of the chemical factors in ants' intra-society recognition, p. 478,in J. Eder and H. Rembold (eds.). Chemistry and Biology of Social Insects. Verlag J. Peperny, Munich.Google Scholar
  14. Francis, B.R., Blanton, W.E., andNunamaker, R.A. 1985. Extractable surface hydrocarbons of workers and drones of the genus.Apis. J. Apic. Res. 24:13–26.Google Scholar
  15. Francis, B.R., Blanton, W.E., Littlefield, J.L., andNunamaker, R.A. 1989. Hydrocarbons of the cuticle and hemolymph of the adult honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82:486–494.Google Scholar
  16. Free, J.B. 1987. Pheromones of Social Bees. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  17. Gamboa, G.J., Reeve, H.K., andPfennig, D.W. 1986. The evolution and ontogeny of nestmate recognition in social wasps.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31:431–454.Google Scholar
  18. Getz, W.M. 1991. The honey bee as a model kin recognition system,in P.G. Hepper (ed.). Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. In press.Google Scholar
  19. Getz, W.M., andSmith, K.B. 1983. Genetic kin recognition: Honey bees discriminate between full and half sisters.Nature 302:147–148.Google Scholar
  20. Getz, W.M., andSmith, K.B. 1986. Honey bee kin recognition: Learning self and nestmate phenotypes.Anim. Behav. 34:1617–1626.Google Scholar
  21. Getz, W.M., andSmith, K.B. 1987. Olfactory sensitivity and discrimination of mixtures in the honeybeeApis mellifera.J. Comp. Physiol. A 160:239–245.Google Scholar
  22. Getz, W.M., Brückner, D., andSmith, K.B. 1988. Variability of chemosensory stimuli within honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies: Differential conditioning assay for discrimination cues.J. Chem. Ecol. 14:253–264.Google Scholar
  23. Getz, W.M., Brückner, D., andSmith, K.B. 1989. Ontogeny of chemosensory cues in worker honey beesApis mellifera.Apidologie 20:105–113.Google Scholar
  24. Hamilton, W.D. 1964a. The genetical evolution of social behavior I.J. Theor. Biol. 7:1–16.Google Scholar
  25. Hamilton, W.D. 1964b. The genetical evolution of social behavior II.J. Theor. Biol. 7:17–52.Google Scholar
  26. Laidlaw, H.H. 1977. Instrumental Insemination of Honey Bee Queens. Dadant and Sons, Hamilton, Illinois. 144 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Mintzer, A. 1989. Incompatibility between colonies of acacia-ants: Genetic models and experimental results, pp. 163–182,in M.D. Breed and R.E. Page (eds.). The Genetics of Social Evolution. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  28. Morel, L., andVan der Meer, R.K. 1987. Nestmate recognition inCamponotus floridanus: Behavioral and chemical evidence for the role of age and social experience, pp. 471–472,in J. Eder and H. Rembold (eds.). Chemistry and Biology of Social Insects. Verlag J. Peperny, Munich.Google Scholar
  29. Page, R.E. 1986. Sperm utilization in social insects.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31:297–320.Google Scholar
  30. Page, R.E., andBreed, M.D. 1987. Kin recognition in social bees.Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:272–275.Google Scholar
  31. Page, R.E., andLaidlaw, H.H. 1988. Full sisters and super sisters: A terminological paradigm.Anim. Behav. 36:944–945.Google Scholar
  32. Pamilo, P., andCrozier, R.H. 1982. Measuring genetic relatedness in natural populations: Methodology.Theor. Popul. Biol. 21:171–193.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, R.-K. 1988. Identification of Africanization in honey bees based on extracted hydrocarbons assay, pp. 275–280,in G.R. Needham, R.E. Page, M. Delfinado-Baker, and C.E. Bowman, (eds.). Africanized Honey Bees and Bee Mites, Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester.Google Scholar
  34. Sneath, P.H.A., andSokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. pp. 137–140, 190–192.Google Scholar
  35. Sokal, R.R., andRohlf, F.J. 1981. Biometry. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 449–450.Google Scholar
  36. Tucker, K.W. 1986. Visible mutants, pp. 57–87,in T.E. Rinderer (ed.). Bee Genetics and Breeding. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  37. Vander Meer, Robert K., Saliwanchik, D. andLavine, B. 1989. Temporal changes in colony cuticular hydrocarbon patterns ofSolenopsis invicta:: implications for nestmate recognition.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:2115–2125.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. PageJr.
    • 1
  • Robert A. Metcalf
    • 2
  • Robert L. Metcalf
    • 3
  • Eric H. EricksonJr.
    • 4
  • Richard L. Lampman
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavis
  2. 2.LHC-NCI, National Institutes of HealthBethesda
  3. 3.Department of EntomologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbana
  4. 4.USDA-ARS Carl Hayden Bee Research UnitTucson

Personalised recommendations