Marketing Letters

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 85–99 | Cite as

Accommodating the effects of brand unfamiliarity in the multidimensional scaling of preference data

  • Rabikar Chatterjee
  • Wayne S. Desarbo
Article
Received:
Revised:

Abstract

This paper presents a multidimensional scaling (MDS) methodology (vector model) for the spatial analysis of preference data that explicitly models the effects of unfamiliarity on evoked preferences. Our objective is to derive a joint space map of brand locations and consumer preference vectors that is free from potential distortion resulting from the analysis of preference data confounded with the effects of consumer-specific brand unfamiliarity. An application based on preference and familiarity ratings for ten luxury car models collected from 240 consumers who intended to buy a luxury car within a designated time frame is presented. The results are compared with those obtained from MDPREF, a popular metric vector MDS model used for the scaling of preference data. In particular, we find that the consumer preference vectors obtained from the proposed methodology are substantially different in orientation from those estimated by the MDPREF model. The implications of the methodology are discussed.

Key words

Brand familiarity Consumer preference analysis Multi-dimensional scaling 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alba, Joseph W., and J. Wesley Hutchinson. (1987). “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (March), 411–454.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Norman H. (1981).Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer, Raymond. (1960). “Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking.” InDynamic Marketing in a Changing World R. Hancock (ed.), Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  4. Bettman, James R. (1973). “Perceived Risk and its Components,”Journal of Marketing Research 10 (May), 184–189.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, J. Douglas, and J. J. Chang. (1964). “Nonparametric Multidimensional Analysis of Paired Comparisons Data,” presented at the Joint Meet. Psychom. Psychon. Soc., Niagara Falls.Google Scholar
  6. Chatterjee, Rabikar, and Jehoshua Eliashberg. (1990). “The Innovation Diffusion Process in a Heterogenous Population: A Micromodeling Approach,”Management Science 36 (September), 1057–1079.Google Scholar
  7. Currim, Imran S., and Rakesh K. Sarin. (1983). “A Procedure for Measuring and Estimating Consumer Preferences Under Uncertainty,”Journal of Marketing Research 20 (August), 249–256.Google Scholar
  8. DeSarbo, Wayne S., Geert de Soete, and Kamel Jedidi. (1987). “Probabilistic Multidimensional Scaling Models for Analyzing Consumer Choice Behavior,”Communication and Cognition 20 (1), 93–116.Google Scholar
  9. DeSarbo, Wayne S., and Vithala R. Rao. (1986). “A Constrained Unfolding Methodology for Product Positioning,”Marketing Science 5 (Winter), 1–19.Google Scholar
  10. De Soete, Geert, and J. Douglas Carroll. (1983). “A Maximum Likelihood Method for Fitting the Wandering Vector Model,”Psychometrika 48 (December), 553–566.Google Scholar
  11. De Soete, Geert, J. Douglas Carroll, and Wayne S. DeSarbo. (1986). “The Wandering Ideal Point Model: A Probabilistic Multidimensional Unfolding Model for Paired Comparisons Data,”Journal of Mathematical Psychology 30 (March), 28–41.Google Scholar
  12. Eliashberg, Jehoshua, and John R. Hauser. (1985). “A Measurement Error Approach for Modeling Consumer Risk Preference,”Management Science 15 (January), 1–25.Google Scholar
  13. Gatignon, Hubert. (1984). “Toward a Methodology for Measuring Advertising Copy Effects,”Marketing Science 3 (Fall), 308–326.Google Scholar
  14. Green, Paul E., and Frank J. Carmone. (1970).Multidimensional Scaling and Related Techniques in Marketing Analysis. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Howard, John A. (1977).Consumer Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Kahnemann, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Unider Risk,”Econometrica 47 (March), 263–291.Google Scholar
  17. Keeney, Ralph L., and Howard Raiffa. (1976).Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, Wayne. (1976).Decision Theory and Human Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. MacKay, David B. (1989). “Probabilistic Multidimensional Scaling: An Anisotropic Model for Distance Judgments,”Journal of Mathematical Psychology 33 (June), 187–205.Google Scholar
  20. MacKay, David B., and Joseph L. Zinnes. (1986). “A Probabilistic Model for the Multidimensional Scaling of Proximity and Preference Data,”Marketing Science 5 (Fall), 325–344.Google Scholar
  21. Meyer, Robert J. (1981). “A Model of Multiattribute Judgments Under Attribute Uncertainty and Informational Constraint,”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (November), 428–441.Google Scholar
  22. Meyer, Robert J., and Arvind Sathi. (1985). “A Multiattribute Model of Consumer Choice During Product Learning,”Marketing Science 4 (Winter), 41–61.Google Scholar
  23. Pratt, John W. (1964). “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large,”Econometrica 41, 35–49.Google Scholar
  24. Ramsay, J. O. (1977). “Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Multidimensional Scaling,”Psychometrika 42 (June), 241–266.Google Scholar
  25. Roberts, John H., and Glen L. Urban. (1988). “Modeling Multiattribute Utility, Risk, and Belief Dynamics for New Consumer Durable Brand Choice,”Management Science 34 (February), 167–185.Google Scholar
  26. Slovic, Paul, and Douglas MacPhillamy. (1974). “Dimensional Commensurability and Cue Utilization in Comparative Judgment,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 11 (April), 172–194.Google Scholar
  27. Sujan, Mita. (1985). “Consumer Knowledge: Effects in Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments,”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (June), 31–46.Google Scholar
  28. Takane, Yoshio. (1978). “A Maximum Likelihood Method for Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: 1. The Case in Which All Empirical Pairwise Orderings are Independent — Theory,”Japanese Psychological Research 20, 7–17.Google Scholar
  29. Wright, Peter, and Barton A. Weitz. (1977). “Time Horizon Effects on Product Evaluation Strategies,”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (November), 429–443.Google Scholar
  30. Yates, J. Frank, Carolyn M. Jagacinski, and Mark D. Faber. (1978). “Evaluation of Partially Described Multiattribute Options,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 21 (April), 240–251.Google Scholar
  31. Zinnes, Joseph L., and David B. MacKay. (1983). “Probabilistic Multidimensional Scaling: Complete and Incomplete Data,”Psychometrika 48 (March), 27–48.Google Scholar
  32. Zinnes, Joseph L., and David B. MacKay. (1987). “Probabilistic Multidimensional Analysis of Preference Ratio Judgments,”Communication and Cognition 20 (1), 17–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rabikar Chatterjee
    • 1
  • Wayne S. Desarbo
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MichiganUSA
  2. 2.University of MichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations