Theoretical Medicine

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 27–42 | Cite as

What's so special about medicine?

  • Daniel P. Sulmasy
Article

Abstract

Health care has increasingly come to be understood as a commodity. The ethical implications of such an understanding are significant. The author argues that health care is not a commodity because health care (1) is non-proprietary, (2) serves the needs of persons who, as patients, are uniquely vulnerable, (3) essentially involves a special human relationship which ought not be bought or sold, (4) helps to define what is meant by ‘necessity’ and cannot be considered a commodity when subjected to rigorous conceptual analysis. The Oslerian conception that medicine is a calling and not a business ought to be reaffirmed by both the profession and the public. Such a conception would have significant ramifications for patient care and health care policy.

Key words

economics efficiency of health care ethics health care as a commodity medicine as a business physician-patient relationship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lakoff G, Johnson M.Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sontag S.Illness As Metaphor. New York: Vintage, 1979.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sulmasy DP. By whose authority? Emerging issues in medical ethics.Theological Studies 1989;50:95–119.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical Research.Securing Access to Health Care: The Ethical Implications of Differences in the Availability of Health Services, Vol 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Plato.Republic. [Grube GMA, transl]. Indianapolis: Indiana: Hackett, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reinhardt UE, Relman AS. For-profit health care.Health Affairs 1986;5:5–31.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agich GJ. Medicine as business and profession.Theor Med 1990;11:311–324.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engelhardt HT, Rie MA. Morality for the medical-industrial complex.N Engl J. Med 1988;316:1086–89.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Osler WJ. The master word in medicine. In:Aequanimitas, With Other Addresses to Physicians, Nurses, and Other Practitioners of Medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Blakiston, 1932:348–71.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eliade M.Shamanism. New York: Pantheon Books, 1964:301–2.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gelfand M.Witch Doctor. London: Harvill Press, 1964:86–93.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rogers Sl.The Shaman: His Symbols and His Healing Power. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1982:27–34.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dougherty CJ. The costs of commercial medicine.Theor Med 1990;11:275–86.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dyer AR. Professional organization of physicians: balancing the cost-quality equation.Theor Med 1989;10:185–93.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Auld DA, Bannock G, Baxter RE, Rees R.The American Dictionary of Economics. New York: Facts on File, 1983.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pellegrino ED. Altruism, self-interest, and medical ethics.JAMA 1987; 258: 1939–40.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fleck LM. Just health care (I): is beneficence enough?Theor Med 1989;10:167–82.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eschenbach K, Woodward RS. Medicine as a career: choices and consequences.Theor Med 1989;10:217–29.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Edelstein L. The Hippocratic physician. In: Temkin O, Temkin CL, eds.Ancient Medicine. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967:87–110.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kudlein F. Medicine as a “liberal art” and the question of the physician's income.Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 1976;31:448–59.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Temkin O. Medical ethics and honoraria in late antiquity. In: Rosenberg CE, ed.Healing and History, New York: Science History Press, 1979:6–26.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Starr P.The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books, 1982:61–2.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cassell E. The function of medicine.Hastings Cent Rep December 1977;7:16–9.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC.For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramsey P.The Patient As Person. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sulmasy DP. The covenant within the covenant: doctors and patients in Sirach 38:1–15.Linacre Quarterly 1988;55:14–24.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suchman AL, Matthews DA. What makes the doctor-patient relationship therapeutic?Ann Intern Med 1988;108:125–30.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    American College of Physicians Ethics Manual, Part 1. History; the patient; other physicians.Ann Intern Med 1989;111:245–52.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peabody FW. The care of the patient.JAMA 1927;88:877–82.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Daniels N.Just Health Care. London: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fleck LM. DRGs: justice and the invisible rationing of health care resources.J Med Phil 1987;12:165–96.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fleck LM. Just health care (II): is equality too much?Theor Med 1989;10:301–10.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Daniels N.Am I My Parents' Keeper? New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aristotle.Metaphysics. [Apostle HG, transl]. Grinnell, Iowa: The Peripatetic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Engelhardt HT.The Foundations of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986:36;356;362–3.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Campbell CS. Religion and moral meaning in bioethics.Hastings Cent Rep July/August 1990;20(Suppl):4–10.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brody B. Justice and competitive markets.J Med Phil 1987;12:37–50.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Enthoven A, Kranick R. A consumer choice health plan for the 1990s. Universal health insurance in system designed to promote equality and economy.N Engl J Med 1989;320:29–37;94–101.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Halper T. DRGs and the idea of a just price.J Med Phil 1987;12:155–64.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bagley CE. Prospective payment and medical ethics.J Med Phil 1987;12:107–22.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mooney G. The demand for effectiveness, efficiency, and equity of health care.Theor Med 1989;10:195–205.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Menzel PT.Strong Medicine: The Ethical Rationing of Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990:37–56.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rainbolt GW. Competition and the patient-centered ethic.J Med Phil 1987;12:85–99.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cicero. De Officiis. [Miller W, transl]. Vol XXI ofThe Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sokolowski R. The art and science of medicine. In Pellegrino ED, Langan J, Harvey JC eds.Catholic Perspectives on Medical Morals. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989:263–75.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Flexner A.Medical Education in the United States and Canada. Boston: Merrymount, 1910.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Brock DW, Buchanan AE. The profit motive in medicine.J Med Phil 1987;12:1–35.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn D, Becker ER, DeNicola M, Ketcham TR. Results and policy implications of the resource-based relative value study.N Engl J Med 1988;319:881–8.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Curzer H. Do physicians make too much money?Theor Med. 1992;13:43–63.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel P. Sulmasy
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Clinical BioethicsGeorgetown University School of MedicineWashington, D.C.USA

Personalised recommendations