Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 559–624 | Cite as

Nimboran position class morphology

  • Sharon Inkelas
Article

Abstract

The verbal morphemes in the Papuan language Nimboran are rigidly ordered; moreover, morphemes with identical ordering properties are in complementary distribution. This suggests that verbal morphemes belong to position classes, each permitting at most one member to surface. Certain morphemes belong simultaneously to more than one position class, with corresponding blocking of all morphemes in the relevant classes. A striking generalization is that position classes blocked in this joint fashion must be contiguous.

The problem is that linear order and blocking diagnose two incompatible orderings for the position classes. The solution rests in reinterpreting verbalpositions as levels in a fixed morphological hierarchy; we resolve the ordering paradox by exploiting the distinction between dominance and precedence available in a hierarchical structure.

This paper adduces new support for the theory of level-ordering and offers a formal theory of position class morphology, a well-known phenomenon which deserves attention in morphological theory. It also covers a large corpus of data — and certain phenomena — not previously discussed in the generative literature.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, Margaret: 1978,Morphological Investigations, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  2. Anceaux, J. C.: 1965,The Nimboran Language: Phonology and Morphology, Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, Deel 44, 'S-Gravenhage — Martinus-Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, Stephen R.: 1982, ‘Where's Morphology?’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 571–612.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, Stephen R.: 1986, ‘Disjunctive Ordering in Inflectional Morphology’,NLLT 4, 1–32.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, Stephen R.: 1992,A-morphous Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Aronoff, Mark and S. N. Sridhar: 1983, ‘Morphological Levels in English and Kannada’, in J. Richardson et al. (eds.),Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax, Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  7. Ashton, E. O.: 1944,Swahili Grammar (Including Intonation), Longmans, London.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, Mark: 1988,Incorporation: a Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Bloomfield, Leonard: 1962,The Menomini Language, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  10. Booij, Geert: 1985, ‘Coordination Reduction in Complex Words’, in H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.),Advances in Non-Linear Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 143–160.Google Scholar
  11. Booij, Geert: 1987, ‘On the Relation between Lexical and Prosodic Phonology’, in P. N. Bertinetto and M. Loporcaro (eds.),Certamen Phonologicum: Papers from the 1987 Cortona Phonology Meeting, Rosenberg and Sellier, pp. 63–75.Google Scholar
  12. Booij, Geert and Jerzy Rubach: 1987, ‘Postcyclic versus Postlexical Rules in Lexical Phonology’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 1–44.Google Scholar
  13. Bybee, Joan: 1985,Morphology: a Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form, Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  14. Cohn, Abigail: 1989, ‘Stress in Indonesian and Bracketing Paradoxes’,NLLT 7, 167–216.Google Scholar
  15. Christdas, Prathima: 1988,The Phonology and Morphology of Tamil, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  16. Elson, Benjamin and Velma Pickett: 1965,An Introduction to Morphology and Syntax, Summer Institute of Linguistics, Santa Ana.Google Scholar
  17. Foley, William A.: 1986,The Papuan Languages of New Guinea, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Grimes, Joseph E.: 1964,The Huichol Language, Janua Linguarum, Series Practica XI, Mouton, London.Google Scholar
  19. Grimes, Joseph E.: 1983,Affix Positions and Cooccurrences: the PARADIGM Program, The Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
  20. Halle, Morris and K. P. Mohanan: 1985, ‘The Segmental Phonology of Modern English’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 57–116.Google Scholar
  21. Hargus, Sharon: 1985,The Lexical Phonology of Sekani, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, published in 1988 by Garland Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Hockett, Charles: 1958,A Course in Modern Linguistics, MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Inkelas, Sharon: 1989,Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, published in 1990 by Garland Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Kari, James: 1989, ‘The Athapaskan Verb Complex’,IJAL 55, 424–54.Google Scholar
  25. Kimball, Geoffrey: 1991,Koasati Grammar, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
  26. Kiparsky, Paul: 1982, ‘Lexical Morphology and Phonology’, in I. S. Yang (ed.),Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistics Society of Korean, Hanshin, Seoul, pp. 3–91.Google Scholar
  27. Kiparsky, Paul: 1984, ‘On the Lexical Phonology of Icelandic’, in C.-C. Elert et al. (eds.),Nordic Prosody III: Papers from a Symposium, University of Umeå, pp. 135–162.Google Scholar
  28. Kiparsky, Paul: 1985, ‘Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology’,Phonology Yearbook 2, 85–138.Google Scholar
  29. Lieber, Rochelle: 1980,On the Organization of the Lexicon, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  30. Marantz, Alec: 1988, ‘Clitics, Morphological Merger, and the Mapping to Phonological Structure’, in Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan (eds.),Theoretical Morphology, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 253–270.Google Scholar
  31. Matthews, Peter: 1972,Inflectional Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. May, Kevin and Wendy May: 1981, ‘Nimboran Phonology Revisited’,Irian 9, 9–32.Google Scholar
  33. McDonough, Joyce: 1990,Topics in the Phonology and Morphology of Navajo Verbs, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  34. McDonough, Joyce: 1991, ‘On the Representation of Consonant Harmony in Navajo’, in Dawn Bates (ed.),Proceedings of the Tenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford Linguistics Association. pp. 319–335.Google Scholar
  35. Mohanan, K. P.: 1982,Lexical Phonology, unpublished dissertation, MIT, distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  36. Mohanan, K. P.: 1986,The Theory of Lexical Phonology, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  37. Muysken, Pieter: 1986, ‘Approaches to Affix Order’,Linguistics 24, 629–643.Google Scholar
  38. Myers, Scott: 1991, ‘Persistent Rules’,Linguistic Inquiry 22, 315–344.Google Scholar
  39. Nespor, Marina and Irene Vogel: 1986,Prosodic Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  40. Prince, Alan: 1983, ‘Relating to the Grid’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 19–106.Google Scholar
  41. Perlmutter, David: 1970, ‘Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax’,Linguistic Inquiry 1, 187–254.Google Scholar
  42. Pesetsky, David: 1979, ‘Russian Morphology and Lexical Theory’, unpublished manuscript, MIT.Google Scholar
  43. Pesetsky, David: 1985, ‘Morphology and Logical Form’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 193–246.Google Scholar
  44. Rice, Keren: 1990, ‘Predicting the Order of the Disjunct Morphemes in the Athapaskan Languages’, unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  45. Rice, Keren: 1993, ‘The Structure of the Slave (Northern Athapaskan) Verb’, in Sharon Hargus and Ellen Kaisse (eds.),Studies in Lexical Phonology, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rice, Keren: 1991, ‘On Deriving Rule Domains: the Athapaskan Case’, in Dawn Bates (ed.),Proceedings of the Tenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford Linguistics Association. pp. 417–429.Google Scholar
  47. Selkirk, Elisabeth: 1982,The Syntax of Words, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  48. Siegel, Dorothy: 1974,Topics in English Morphology, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, published 1979 by Garland Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Simpson, Jane and Margaret Withgott: 1986, ‘Pronominal Clitic Clusters and Templates’, in Hagit Borer (ed.),Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Speas, Margaret: 1990,Phrase Structure in Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  51. Sproat, Richard: 1985,On Deriving The Lexicon, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  52. Sproat, Richard: 1986, ‘Malayalam Compounding: a Non-Stratum Ordered Account’,Proceedings of the Fifth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford Linguistics Association, pp. 268–288.Google Scholar
  53. Sproat, Richard: 1988, ‘Bracketing Paradoxes, Cliticization and Other Topics: the Mapping between Syntactic and Phonological Structure’, in M. Everaert et al. (eds.),Morphology and Modularity, Dordrecht, Foris, pp. 339–360.Google Scholar
  54. Stump, Gregory: 1991, ‘On the Theoretical Status of Position Class Restrictions on Inflectional Affixes’,Yearbook of Morphology 4.Google Scholar
  55. Stump, Gregory: 1992, ‘Position Classes and Morphological Theory’, unpublished manuscript, University of Kentucky (abbreviated version presented at the 1992 Linguistics Society of America Annual Meeting Philadelphia.)Google Scholar
  56. Voorhoeve, Clements L.: 1975,The Languages of Irian Jaya, Pacific Linguistics Series B, no. 31, Australian National University, Research School of Pacific Studies, Canberra.Google Scholar
  57. Wurm, Steven A.: 1982,Papuan Languages of Oceania, Gunter Narr, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  58. Zwicky, Arnold: 1985, ‘How to Describe Inflection’,Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 11, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon Inkelas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeley

Personalised recommendations