Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 363–368

More evidence for the universality of a contempt expression

  • David Matsumoto
Article

Abstract

Since its publication in 1986, Ekman and Friesen's (1986) discovery of a universal facial expression unique to contempt has received considerable attention (e.g., see Ekman & Friesen, 1988; Ekman & Heider, 1988; Ekman, O'Sullivan, & Matsumoto, 1991a, 1991b; Izard & Haynes, 1988; Russell, 1991a, 1991b; Ricci Bitti, Brighetti, Garotti, Boggi-Cavallo, 1989). Actually, much of this argument began before there was adequate sampling of contempt photographs across many cultures. In order to address this concern, this study reports judgment data on all 12 photos used in previous studies depicting the contempt expression from four non-American cultures. The data provide a strong replication of Ekman and Friesen's (1986) and Ekman and Heider's (1988) findings for a universal expression of contempt.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ekman, P. (1982).Emotion in the human face. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978).Manual for the facial action coding system. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1986). A new pancultural facial expression of emotion.Motivation and Emotion, 10 159–168.Google Scholar
  4. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., O'Sullivan, M., Chan, A., Diacoyanni-Tarlatzia, I., Heider, K., Krause, R., LeCompte, W., Pitcairn, T., Ricci-Bitti, P., Scherer, K., Tomita, M., & Tzavaras, A. (1987). Universals and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 712–717.Google Scholar
  5. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1988). who knows what about contempt: A reply to Izard and Haynes.Motivation and Emotion, 12 17–22.Google Scholar
  6. Ekman, P., & Heider, K. G. (1988). The universality of a contempt expression: A replication.Motivation and Emotion, 12 303–308.Google Scholar
  7. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Matsumoto, D. (1991a). Confusions about context in the judgment of facial expression: A reply to “Contempt and the relativity thesis.”Motivation and Emotion, 15 169–176.Google Scholar
  8. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Matsumoto, D. (1991b). Contradictions in the study of contempt: What's it all about?Motivation and Emotion, 15 293–296.Google Scholar
  9. Izard, C. E., & Haynes, O. M. (1988). On the form and universality of the contempt expression: A challenge to Ekman and Friesen's claim of discovery.Motivation and Emotion, 12 1–16.Google Scholar
  10. Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1988).Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFEE). Slides available from David Matsumoto, Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132.Google Scholar
  11. Ricci Bitti, P. E., Brighetti, G., Garotti, P. L., & Boggi-Cavallo, P. (1989). Is contempt expressed by pancultural facial movements? In J. P. Forgas & J. M. Innes (Eds.),Recent Advances in Social Psychology: An International Perspective (pp. 329–339). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Russell, J. A. (1991a). The contempt expression and the relativity thesis.Motivation and Emotion, 15 149–168.Google Scholar
  13. Russell, J. A. (1991b). Negative results on a reported facial expression of contempt.Motivation and Emotion, 15 285–292.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Matsumoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySan Francisco State UniversitySan Francisco

Personalised recommendations