Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 755–766

Cyclic syllabification in Mongolian

  • Jan-Olof Svantesson


Mongolian is a language with a rich suffix-based morphology. Underlying forms can contain long consonant strings into which schwa vowels must be epenthesized in order to create well-formed syllables. Syllabification (including epenthesis) is governed by universal principles (the sonority law, maximality, and directionality) and a few language specific rules. Syllabification is cyclic in relation to the morphology, as is shown directly by minimal pairs having the same underlying segments but different syllabifications due to different morphological structure.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Booij, Geert: 1992, ‘Lexical Phonology and Prosodic Phonology’, in W. Dressler, H. Luschützky, O. Pfeiffer, and J. Rennison (eds.),Phonologica 1988, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 49–62.Google Scholar
  2. Clements, George: 1990, ‘The Role of the Sonority Cycle in Core Syllabification’, in J. Kingston and M. Beckman (eds.),Papers in Laboratory Phonology 1, Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 283–333.Google Scholar
  3. Damdinsürėn, Cėndijn: 1958, ‘Šinė üsgijn dürėm’ [The New Orthography], inMongol xėl bičgijn zarim asuudal, Šinžlėx uxaan, dėėd bolovsrolyn xürėėlėn, Ulaanbaatar, pp. 15–43.Google Scholar
  4. Dell, François and Mohamed Elmedlaoui: 1985, ‘Syllabic Consonants and Syllabification in Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber’,Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7, 105–30.Google Scholar
  5. Foley, James: 1972, ‘Rule Precursors and Phonological Change by Meta-rule’, in R. Stockwell and R. Macaulay (eds.),Linguistic Change and Generative Theory, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 96–100.Google Scholar
  6. Hattori Shirō: 1951, ‘Mōkogo Chaharu hōgen no on'in taikei’ [Phonemic Structure of Mongol (Chakhar Dialect)],Gengo kenkyū [Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan]19–20, 68–102.Google Scholar
  7. Hayes, Bruce: 1986, ‘Inalterability in CV Phonology’,Language 62, 321–51.Google Scholar
  8. Itô, Junko: 1986,Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, published 1988 by Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Itô, Junko: 1989, ‘A Prosodic Theory of Epenthesis’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7, 217–59.Google Scholar
  10. Jespersen, Otto: 1987–99,Fonetik — En systematisk fremstilling af læren om sproglyd, Schubotheske Forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  11. Kahn, Daniel: 1976,Syllable-based Generalizations in English Phonology, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  12. Kaye, Jonathan and Jean Lowenstamm: 1981, ‘Syllable Structure and Markedness Theory’, in A. Belletti, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi (eds.),Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Pisa, pp. 287–315.Google Scholar
  13. Kenstowicz, Michael: 1982, ‘Gemination and Spirantization in Tigrinya’,Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12, 103–22.Google Scholar
  14. Kiparsky, Paul: 1979, ‘Metrical Structure Assignment is Cyclic’,Linguistic Inquiry 10, 421–41.Google Scholar
  15. Lapointe, Steven and Mark Feinstein: 1982, ‘The Role of Vowel Deletion and Epenthesis in the Assignment of Syllable Structure’, in H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.),The Structure of Phonological Representations (Part II), Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 69–120.Google Scholar
  16. Luvsanvandan, Šadavyn: 1967,Orčin cagijn mongol xėlnij bütėc — Avia, avialbar xoër n' — Nėgdügėėr dėvtėr [The Structure of Modern Mongolian — Phonetics and Phonology — First Book], Mongolian Academy of Sciences Press, Ulaanbaatar.Google Scholar
  17. McCarthy, John: 1986, ‘OCP Effects: Gemination and Antigemination’,Linguistic Inquiry 17, 207–63.Google Scholar
  18. Mors, Christine ter: 1985, ‘Empty V-nodes and Their Role in the Klamath Vowel Alternations’, in H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.),Advances in Nonlinear Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 313–33.Google Scholar
  19. Noske, Roland: 1985, ‘Syllabification and Syllable Changing Processes in Yawelmani’, in H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.),Advances in Nonlinear Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 335–61.Google Scholar
  20. Poppe, Nikolaus: 1951,Khalkha-mongolische Grammatik, Steiner, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  21. Poppe, Nicholas: 1970,Mongolian Language Handbook, Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington.Google Scholar
  22. Rialland, Annie and Redouane Djamouri: 1984, ‘Harmonie vocalique, consonantique et structures de dépendance dans le mot en mongol khalkha’,Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris,79, 333–83.Google Scholar
  23. Saitō Yoshio: 1984, ‘Gendai Mongorugo no jakka boin to boin chōwa’ [Reduced Vowels and Vowel Harmony in Modern Khalkha Mongolian],Lexicon (Tōkyō)13, 57–71.Google Scholar
  24. Schein, Barry and Donca Steriade: 1986, ‘On Geminates’,Linguistic Inquiry 17, 691–744.Google Scholar
  25. Sievers, Eduard: 1876,Grundzüge der Lautphysiologie zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen, Breitkopf und Härtel, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  26. Steriade, Donca: 1982,Greek Prosodies and the Nature of Syllabification, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  27. Street, John: 1963,Khalkha Structure, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  28. Stuart, Don Graham and Matthew Haltod: 1957, ‘The Phonology of the Word in Modern Standard Mongolian’,Word 13, 65–99.Google Scholar
  29. Svantesson, Jan-Olof: 1985, ‘Vowel Harmony Shift in Mongolian’,Lingua 67, 283–327.Google Scholar
  30. Svantesson, Jan-Olof: 1994, ‘Mongolian Syllable Structure’Working Papers (Dept. of Linguistics, Lund University) 42, 225–239.Google Scholar
  31. Tömörcėrėn, Zododovyn: 1968, ‘Mongol xėlnij üe ės bütėėx ėgšgijn učir’ [On Non-syllabic Vowels in Mongolian],Šinžlex Uxaany Akademijin medee 1968:1, 61–68.Google Scholar
  32. Tuller, Laurice: 1981, ‘On Nominal Inflection in Hausa’, in T. Thomas-Flinders (ed.),Inflectional Morphology: Introduction to the Extended Word-and-Paradigm Theory (UCLA Occasional Papers #4: Working Papers in Morphology), pp. 117–57.Google Scholar
  33. Whitney, William: 1866, ‘On the Relation of Vowels and Consonants’,Journal of the American Oriental Society 8, 357–73.Google Scholar
  34. Whitney, William: 1874, ‘The Relation of Vowel and Consonant’, in W. Whitney,Oriental and Linguistic studies — Second Series, Scribner's, New York, pp. 277–300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan-Olof Svantesson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations