Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 63–120 | Cite as

Clause structure and V-movement in the languages of the Balkans

  • María Luisa Rivero
Article
Received:
Revised:

Abstract

Albanian, Bulgarian, Modern Greek, and Rumanian share the following clause structure: [CP C0 [MP M0 [T/AgrP T/Agr0 [AuxP Aux0 [VP V0]]]]]. In Balkan clauses, the phrase headed by the complementizer takes a phrase headed by an invariant modal particle as complement. The Tense/Agreement complex, the auxiliaries, and the main verb follow MP. In addition, Balkan languages share interesting varieties of X0-movement for non-finite verbs, with theoretical consequences for principles of UG. In Bulgarian and Rumanian, (Long) Head-movement raises V0 to C0 across the finite Aux0, as inPročel sŭm knigata ‘I have read the book’; such structures comply with the Empty Category Principle via Relativized Minimality, and escape the Head Movement Constraint. In Albanian, Greek, and Rumanian, Head-movement places the imperative V0 in C0, as inGhrápse to ‘Write it!’. Albanian imperatives show Long Head Movement and comply with the ECP like other LHM patterns in cases where the V-stem precedes the clitic and the affix in that order:Tregoj-i-ni ‘Tell him!’. Greek and Rumanian Gerunds display Head-movement to M0, as inI Maria kratóndas to ‘Mary holding it’. In similar Albanian constructions M0 is filled, and this prevents V0-raising, as inPashë [Brixhiden [M0duke]kenduar] ‘I saw Brigitte singing’.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Head Movement Interesting Variety Modal Particle Relativize Minimality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, Mark C.: 1985a,Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, Mark C.: 1985b, ‘Syntactic Affixation and English Gerunds’,WCCFL 4, Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, Mark C.: 1988,Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Belletti, Adriana: 1990, ‘On the Morphosyntactic Nature of the Sequence “Aux + Past Participle” in Italian, in J. Mascaró and M. Nespor (eds.),Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 25–32.Google Scholar
  5. Borsley, Robert and María Luisa Rivero: 1991, ‘Clitic Auxiliaries and Incorporation in Polish’, paper read at the Vienna Eurotyp Meeting, October 1991.Google Scholar
  6. Borsley, Robert, María Luisa Rivero, and Janig Stephens: 1992, ‘Long Head Movement in Breton’, paper read at the Celtic Syntax Conference, Bangor, Wales, June 1992.Google Scholar
  7. Brandi, Luciana and Patricia Cordin: 1989, ‘Two Italian Dialects and the Null Subject Parameter’, in O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.),The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 111–142.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, Noam: 1986,Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, Noam: 1991, ‘Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation’, in R. Freidin (ed.),Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 417–454.Google Scholar
  10. Demiraj, Shaban: 1986,Gramatikë Historike e Gjuhës Shqipe, University of Tirana, Faculty of History and Philology, Tirana.Google Scholar
  11. den Besten, Hans: 1983, ‘On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules’, in W. Abraham (ed.),On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 47–138.Google Scholar
  12. den Besten, Hans and Gerd Webelhuth: 1990, ‘Stranding’, in G. Grewendorf and W. Sternefeld (eds.),Scrambling and Barriers, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
  13. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen: 1987,Syntaxe du roumain. Chaines thématiques, Thèse de Doctorat d'État, Université de Paris 7, Paris.Google Scholar
  14. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen: 1989, ‘Emploi du subjonctif et structure de la phrase en roumain’,Revue des Langues Romances 93.2.Google Scholar
  15. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen: 1990, ‘Auxiliaries and Sentence Structure in Romanian’, in J. Mascaró and M. Nespor (eds.),Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 101–111.Google Scholar
  16. Emonds, Joseph: 1976,A Transformational Approach to English Syntax, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Emonds, Joseph: 1978, ‘The Verbal complex V′-V in French’,Linguistic Inquiry 9, 151–175.Google Scholar
  18. Enç, Murvet: 1987, ‘Anchoring Conditions for Tense’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 633–657.Google Scholar
  19. Farkas, Donka: 1982,Intentionality and Romance Subjunctive Relatives, Ph.D. dissertation distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  20. Farkas, Donca: 1984, ‘Subjunctive Complements in Rumanian’, in P. Baldi (ed.),Proceedings of the 12th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 355–372.Google Scholar
  21. Farkas, Donka: 1989, ‘On the Morpho-syntax of Subjunctive Clauses in Rumanian’,International Journal of Rumanian Studies 6(2), 7–19.Google Scholar
  22. Grimshaw, Jane: 1991, ‘Extended Projections’, manuscript, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
  23. Grimshaw, Jane and Armin Mester: 1988, ‘Light Verbs and Theta-Marking’,Linguistic Inquiry 19, 205–232.Google Scholar
  24. Guéron, Jacqueline: 1990, ‘Particles, Prepositions, and Verbs’, in J. Mascaró and M. Nespor (eds.),Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 153–166.Google Scholar
  25. Hesse, Rudolf: 1980,Syntax of the Modern Greek Verbal System, Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  26. Holmberg, Anders and Christer Platzack: 1988, ‘On the Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax’,Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 42, Lund University, pp. 25–43.Google Scholar
  27. Iatridou, Sabine: 1990, ‘About Agr(P)’,Linguistic Inquiry 21, 551–577.Google Scholar
  28. Joseph, Brian: 1988, ‘Pronominal Affixes in Modern Greek: The Case against Clisis’,Papers from the 24th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, pp. 203–215.Google Scholar
  29. Joseph, Brian and Irene Philippaki-Warburton: 1987,Modern Greek, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  30. Kayne, Richard: 1983, ‘Chains, Categories External, to S and French Complex Inversion’,NLLT 1, 107–139.Google Scholar
  31. Kayne, Richard: 1984,Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  32. Kayne, Richard: 1985, ‘L'accord du participe passé en français et en italien’,Modèles Linguistiques 7, 73–90.Google Scholar
  33. Kayne, Richard: 1989, ‘Null Subjects and Clitic Climbing’, in O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.),The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 239–262.Google Scholar
  34. Kempchinsky, Paula: 1986,Romance Subjunctive Clauses and Logical Form, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  35. Kempchinsky, Paula: 1989, ‘Directionality of Government and Nominative Case Assignment in Romanian’, in C. Kirschner and J. DeCesaris (eds.),Studies in Romance Linguistics, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 209–224.Google Scholar
  36. Kitagawa, Yoshihisha: 1986,Subjects in Japanese and English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  37. Koster, Jan: 1987,Domains and Dynasties, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  38. Laka, Itziar: 1989, ‘Constraints on Sentence Negation: The Case of Basque’,MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 199–216.Google Scholar
  39. Lema, José: 1989, ‘Morphologization of the Spanish Future and Conditional: Synchrony and Diachrony’, manuscript, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
  40. Lema, José: 1992,Licensing Conditions on Head Movement, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
  41. Lema, José and Maria Luisa Rivero: 1989, ‘Long Head Movement: ECP vs. HMC’,Proceedings of NELS 20, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 333–347.Google Scholar
  42. Lema, José and Maria Luisa Rivero: 1991, ‘Types of Verbal Movement in Old Spanish: Modals, Futures, and Perfects’,Probus 3(3), 237–278.Google Scholar
  43. Lema, José and Maria Luisa Rivero: 1992, ‘Inverted Conjugations and V-second Effects in Romance’, in C. Laeufer and T. Morgan (eds.),Theoretical Analysis in Contemporary Romance Linguistics, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 311–328.Google Scholar
  44. Longobardi, Giuseppe: 1985, ‘Connectedness, Scope, and C-command’,Linguistic Inquiry 16, 163–192.Google Scholar
  45. Mallinson, Graham: 1986,Rumanian, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  46. McConnell-Ginet, Sally: 1982, ‘Adverbs and Logical Form’,Language 58, 144–184.Google Scholar
  47. Milsark, Gary: 1988 ‘Singl-ing’,Linguistic Inquiry 19, 611–634.Google Scholar
  48. Newmark, Leonard, Philip Hubbard, and Peter Prifti: 1982.Standard Albanian, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
  49. Ouhalla, Jamal: 1990, ‘Sentential Negation, Relativised Minimality, and the Aspectual Status of Auxiliaries’,The Linguistic Review 7, 183–231.Google Scholar
  50. Partee, Barbara: 1973, ‘Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English’,The Journal of Philosophy 70, 601–609.Google Scholar
  51. Partee, Barbara: 1984, ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’,Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243–286.Google Scholar
  52. Pollock, Jean-Yves: 1987 ‘Verb Movement, UG and the Structure of IP’,Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
  53. Rivero, María Luisa: 1986 ‘Parameters in the Typology of Clitics in Romance and Old Spanish’,Language 62, 774–807.Google Scholar
  54. Rivero, María Luisa: 1989, ‘Estructura flexional y movimiento(s) de verbo: Futuros, condicionales, y perfectos en rumano y español medieval’, to appear in R. Lorenzo (ed.),Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Romance Linguistics and Philology, Vol. 1, Fundación Pedro Barrié de la Maza, A Coruña.Google Scholar
  55. Rivero, María Luisa: 1990, ‘The Location of Non-Active Voice in Albanian and Modern Greek’,Linguistic Inquiry 21, 135–146.Google Scholar
  56. Rivero, María Luisa: 1991a, ‘Exceptional Case Marking Effects in Rumanian Subjunctive Complements’, in D. Wanner and D. A. Kibbee (eds.),New Analyses in Romance Linguistics, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 273–298.Google Scholar
  57. Rivero, María Luisa: 1991b, ‘Long Head Movement and Negation: Serbo-Croatian vs. Slovak and Czech’,The Linguistic Review 8, 319–351.Google Scholar
  58. Rivero, María Luisa: 1992a, ‘Adverb-Incorporation and the Syntax of Adverbs in Modern Greek’,Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 289–331.Google Scholar
  59. Rivero, María Luisa: to appear, ‘Auxiliares funcionales y auxiliares léxicos’, to appear inNueva Revista de Filología Hispánica in 1993 (special issue edited by Violeta Demonte).Google Scholar
  60. Rivero, María Luisa: 1993, ‘Long Head Movement and V2 vs Null Subjects in Old Romance’,Lingua 89, 217–245.Google Scholar
  61. Rizzi, Luigi: 1989,Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  62. Rizzi, Luigi: 1990, ‘Speculations on Verb Second’, in J. Mascaró and M. Nespor (eds.),Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 375–386.Google Scholar
  63. Roberts, Ian: 1992,Verbs and Diachronic Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  64. Rudin, Catherine: 1988, ‘On Multiple Questions and Multiple Wh-fronting’,NLLT 6, 445–501.Google Scholar
  65. Scatton, Ernest: 1983,A Reference Grammar of Modern Bulgarian, Slavica, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
  66. Travis, Lisa: 1984,Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  67. Webelhuth, Gert: 1985, ‘German is Configurational’,The Linguistic Review 4, 203–246.Google Scholar
  68. Zagona, Karen: 1988, ‘Verb-Phrase Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  69. Zanuttini, Raffaella: 1989, ‘Two Types of Negative Markers’,Proceedings of NELS, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 517–530.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Luisa Rivero
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations