Political Behavior

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 123–156 | Cite as

Nonverbal displays and political leadership in France and the United States

  • Roger D. Masters
  • Denis G. Sullivan
Article

Abstract

Because contemporary theories of politics discuss the appeal of leaders primarily in verbal terms, it is often difficult to go beyond anecdotes when explaining the effects of televized appearances of leaders and candidates. Experimental studies of the way American viewers respond to televized excerpts of leaders were replicated in France shortly before the legislative elections of March 1986, using comparable expressive displays of Laurent Fabius (then Social Prime Minister), Jacques Chirac (Gaullist Mayor of Paris who became Prime Minister), and Jean Marie LePen (head of the Front Nationale). Although the results show striking similarities in the system of nonverbal behavior in France and the United States, there are cultural differences in the role of anger/threat (which elicits more positive responses from French viewers than Americans) as well as variations in the evocative character of the facial displays of individual leaders. These experimental findings clarify recent discussions concerning the evolution of the French party system, providing insights into the role of political culture as well as leadership “style” in the media age.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, Robert, D. R. Kinder, M. D. Peters, and S. T. Fiske (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 619–30.Google Scholar
  2. Andreoli, V., and S. Worchel (1978). Effects of media, communicator, and message position on attitude change.Public Opinion Quarterly 42: 59–70.Google Scholar
  3. Argyle, M., V. Salter, H. Nicholson, M. Williams, and P. Burgess (1970). The communication of inferior and superior attitudes by verbal and nonverbal signals.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 9: 222–231.Google Scholar
  4. Arnhart, Larry (1981).Aristotle on Political Reasoning. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, Max (1984).Our Master's Voices. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  6. Babchuk, Wayne A., Raymond B. Hames, and Ross A. Thompson (1985). Sex differences in the recognition of infant facial expressions of emotion: The primary caretaker hypothesis.Ethology and Sociobiology 6: 89–102.Google Scholar
  7. Barker, Ernst (1960).Greek Political Thought. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
  8. Barner-Barry, Carol (1981). Longitudinal observation research and the study of basic forms of political socialization. In M. Watts (ed.),Biopolitics: Ethological and Physiological Approaches, pp. 51–60. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 7. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Barner-Barry, Carol (1986). Rob: Children's tacit use of peer ostracism to control aggressive behavior. In Gruter and Masters,Ostracism, pp. 133–145.Google Scholar
  10. Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970).Kinesics and Context: Essays on Body Motion Communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  11. Blumler, Jay, Roland Cayrol, and Gabriel Thovenon (1978).La télévision, fait-elle l'élection? Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
  12. Chance, Michael R. A. (1987). The organization of attention in groups. In M. von Cranach (ed.),Methods of Inference from Animal to Human Behavior. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  13. Chase, Ivan D. (1980). Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: A comparative perspective.American Sociological Review 45: 905–24.Google Scholar
  14. Chase, Ivan D. (1982). Behavioral sequences during dominance hierarchy formation in chickens.Science 216: 439–440.Google Scholar
  15. Cloninger, C. Robert (1987). A systemic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants.Archives of General Psychiatry 44: 573–588.Google Scholar
  16. Conover, P. J. (1981). Political cues and perception of candidates.American Political Quarterly 9: 423–48.Google Scholar
  17. de Waal, Frans (1982).Chimpanzee Politics. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  18. de Waal, Frans (1986). The brutal elimination of a rival among captive male chimpanzees. In Gruter and Masters,Ostracism, pp. 89–103.Google Scholar
  19. Denckla, Martha (1986). Neurology of social competence.ACLD Newsletter, June/July, p. 1.Google Scholar
  20. Ehrmann, Henry W. (1983).Politics in France (4th ed.) Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  21. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenaeus (1979). Ritual and ritualization from a biological perspective. In M. von Cranach, K. Foppa, W. Lepenies, and D. Ploog, eds.,Human Ethology, pp. 3–55. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ekman, Paul, and Wallace V. Friesen (1978).The Facial Action Coding System. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ekman, Paul, and Wallace V. Friesen (1982). Felt, false, and miserable smiles.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 6: 238–252.Google Scholar
  24. Ekman, Paul, and Harriet Oster (1979). Facial expressions of emotion.Annual Review of Psychology 30: 527–554.Google Scholar
  25. Flohr, Heiner, Wolfgang Tonnesmann, and Uwe Pohls (1986). Studying leader-follower relationships from an ethological perspective. Presented to 5th International Conference on Human Ethology, Tützing, West Germany.Google Scholar
  26. Frey, Siegfried (1987). Medienwirkuing Nonverbaler Kommunikation im Interkulturellen Vergleich: Eine Untersuchung zur Visuellen Präsentation politischer Funktionsträger in Nachrichtensendungen von BRD, Frankreich and USA. Proposal to Deutsch Forschungsbeminschaft. Duisburg: Universität Duisburg.Google Scholar
  27. Frey, Siegfried, H.-P. Hirsbrunner, J. Pool, and W. Daw (1981). Das Berner System zur Untersuchtung nonverbaler Interaktion: I. Due Erhebung des Rohdatenprotokolls. In P. Winkler, ed.,Methoden der Analyse von Face-to-Face Situationen. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
  28. Frey, Siegfried, H.-P, Hirsbrunner, A. Florin, W. Daw, and R. Crawford (1983). A unified approach to the investigation of nonverbal and verbal behavior in communication research. In W. Doise and S. Moscovici, eds.,Current Issues in European Social Psychology, pp. 143–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gaxie, Daniel, ed. (1985).Explication du Vote. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
  30. Goodall, Jane (1983). Order without Law. In Margaret Gruter and Paul Bohannan (eds.),Law, Biology, and Culture: The Evolution of Law, pp. 50–62. Santa Barbara: Ross Erikson.Google Scholar
  31. Goodall, Jane (1986). Social rejection, exclusion, and shunning among the Gombe Chimpanzees. In Gruter and Masters,Ostracism, pp. 79–88.Google Scholar
  32. Gruter, M., and R. Masters, eds. (1986).Ostracism: A Social and Biological Phenomenon. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  33. Hirsbrunner, H.-P., A. Florin, and S. Frey (1981). Das Berner System zur Untersuchung nonverbaler Interaktion: II: Die Auswertung von Zeitreihen visuellauditiver Information. In P. Winkler (ed.),Methoden der Analyse von Face-to-Face Situationen. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
  34. Hall, Judith (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues.Psychological Bulletin 85: 845–857.Google Scholar
  35. Iyengar, Shanto, M. Peters, and D. Kinder (1982). Experimental demonstrations of the “not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs.American Political Science Review 81: 848–58.Google Scholar
  36. Iyengar, Shanto, and D. Kinder (1985). Psychological accounts of agenda-setting. In Kraus and Perloff,Mass Media and Political Thought, pp. 117–40.Google Scholar
  37. Iyengar, Shanto, and D. Kinder (1987).News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Keating, C. F., A. Mazur, M. H. Segall, P. G. Cysneiros, W. T. Divale, J. E. Killbride, S. Komin, P. Leahy, B. Thurman, and R. Wirsing (1981). Culture and the perception of social dominance from facial expression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 615–626.Google Scholar
  39. Kraus, Sidney, and Richard Perloff, eds. (1985).Mass Media and Political Thought. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Lanzetta, John T., and Scott P. Orr (1980). Influence of facial expressions on the classical condition of fear.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 1081–1087.Google Scholar
  41. Lanzetta, John T., Denis G. Sullivan, Roger D. Masters, and Gregory J. McHugo (1985). Emotional and cognitive responses to televised images of political leaders. In Kraus and Perloff,Mass Media and Political Thought, pp. 85–116.Google Scholar
  42. Lau, Richard R., and Ralph Erber (1985). Political sophistication: An information-processing perspective. In Kraus and Perloff,Mass Media and Political Thought, pp. 37–64.Google Scholar
  43. Lorenz, Konrad Z. (1966).On Aggression. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  44. Lorenz, Konrad Z. 1970.Essays in the Study of Animal and Human Behaviour, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lorenz, Konrad Z., and Paul Leyhausen (1973).Motivation of Human and Animal Behavior. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  46. Madsen, Douglas (1985). A biochemical property related to power-seeking in humans.American Political Science Review 79: 448–57.Google Scholar
  47. Marcus, George (1988). The structure of emotional appraisal: 1984 presidential candidates.American Political Science Review 82: 737–762.Google Scholar
  48. Masters, Roger D. (1976). The impact of ethology on political science. In A. Somit, ed.,Biology and Politics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  49. Masters, Roger D. (1981). Linking ethology and political science: Photographs, political attention, and presidential elections. In M. Watts (ed.),Biopolitics: Ethological and Physiological Approaches, pp. 61–89, New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 7, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  50. Masters, Roger D. (1989).The Nature of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Masters, Roger D. (forthcoming). Gender and political cognition: Integrating evolutionary biology and political science.Politics and the Life Sciences.Google Scholar
  52. Masters, Roger D., and Denis G. Sullivan (1986). Nonverbal displays and political leadership in France and the United States. Paper presented to Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  53. Masters, Roger D., Denis G. Sullivan, John T. Lanzetta, and Gregory J. McHugh (1985). Facial displays as a political variable. Paper presented to Congress of the International Political Science Association, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  54. Masters, Roger D., Denis G. Sullivan, John T. Lanzetta, and Gregory J. McHugo (1986). The facial displays of leaders: Toward an ethology of human politics.Journal of Social and Biological Structures 9:319–43.Google Scholar
  55. Masters, Roger D., Denis G. Sullivan, Alice Feola, and Gregory J. McHugo (1987). Television coverage of candidates' display behavior during the 1984 Democratic primaries.International Political Science Review 8: 121–30.Google Scholar
  56. McGuire, Michael T. (1983). Social dominance in adult male Vervet monkeys.Social Science Information 22: 89–123.Google Scholar
  57. McGuire, Michael T., and Michael J. Raleigh (1986). Behavioral and physiological correlates of ostracism. In Gruter and Masters.Ostracism, pp. 39–52.Google Scholar
  58. McGuire, William J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson (eds.),Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd ed., Vol. II, pp. 233–346. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  59. McHugo, Gregory J., John T. Lanzetta, Denis G. Sullivan, Roger D. Masters, and Basil G. Englis (1985). Emotional reactions to a political leader's expressive displays.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 1512–23.Google Scholar
  60. McHugo, Gregory J. and John T. Lanzetta (1986). Emotional and mental reactions to televised images of political leaders. Paper presented to American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., August 1986.Google Scholar
  61. McHugo, Gregory J., John T. Lanzetta, and Lauren K. Bush (1987). The effect of attitudes on emotional reactions to expressive displays of political leaders. Paper submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  62. Meltzoff, A., and M. Moore (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates.Science 198: 75–78.Google Scholar
  63. Miller, Arthur M., and Martin P. Wattenberg (1985). Throwing the rascals out: Policy and performance evaluations of presidential candidates, 1952–1980.American Political Science Review 79: 359–72.Google Scholar
  64. Miller, Arthur H., Martin P. Wattenberg, and O. Malanchuk (1982). Cognitive representation of political candidates. Paper presented to the 1982 Convention of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  65. Montagner, Hubert (1978).L'Enfant et la Communication. Paris: Stock.Google Scholar
  66. Mouchon, Jean, and Roger D. Masters (1986). Le comportement nonverbale et la vie politique.Le Francais et le Monde. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  67. Muller, Brian, David Futrell, Debbie Stairs, Dianne M. Tice, Kathryn E. Dawson, Catherine A. Riordan, John G. Kennedy, Roy F. Baumeister, Christine E. Radloff, George R. Goethals, and Paul Rosenfeld (1986). Newscasters' facial expressions and voting behavior of viewers: Can a smile elect a president.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 291–295.Google Scholar
  68. Muzet, Denis, and Roger D. Masters. In preparation. Le comportment nonverbale des hommes politiques et les attitudes des téléspectateurs en France.Google Scholar
  69. Nakamura, Robert T., and Denis G. Sullivan (1978). Party democracy and democratic control. In W. D. Burnham and W. M. Weinberg (eds.),American Politics and Public Policy, chap. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Ostrom, Charles W., and Dennis M. Simon (1985). Promise and performance: A dynamic model of presidential popularity.American Political Science Review 79: 334–58.Google Scholar
  71. Papousek, Hanus, and Mechthild Papousek (1979). Early ontogeny of human social interaction: Its biological roots and social dimensions. In M. von Cranach, Klaus Foppa, Wolf Lepenies, and Detlev Ploog (eds.),Human Ethology, pp. 456–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Pierce R., and Converse, P. (1981). Candidate visibility in France and the United States.Legislative Studies Quarterly VI: 339–369.Google Scholar
  73. Plutchik, Robert (1980).Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary Synthesis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  74. Raleigh, Michael J., and Michael T. McGuire (1986). Animal analogues of ostracism: Biological mechanisms and social consequences. In Gruter and Masters,Ostracism, pp. 53–66.Google Scholar
  75. Ranney, Austin (1983).Channels of Power: The Impact of Television on American Politics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  76. Ripley, Suzanne (1965). Intertroop encounters among Ceylon Grey Langurs (Pres bytis entellus). In S. Altmann (ed.),Social Communication among Primates, pp. 237–53. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  77. Rosenberg, Shawn, Lisa Bohan, Patrick McCafferty, and Kevin Harris (1986). The image and the vote: The effect of candidate presentation on voter preference.American Journal of Political Science 30: 108–127.Google Scholar
  78. Sapir, Selma G. (1985).The Clinical Teaching Model. New York: Bruner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  79. Sartori, Giovanni (1966). European political parties: The case of polarized pluralism. In Joseph LaPalombara and Myron Weiner (eds.),Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Schaller, George (1965).The Year of the Gorilla. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  81. Schubert, Glendon (1982). Nonverbal communication as political behavior. In Mary Ritchie Key (ed.),Nonverbal Communication Today: Current Research. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
  82. Schubert, James N. (1986). Human vocalizations in agnostic political encounters.Social Science Information 25: 457–492.Google Scholar
  83. Schubert, James N. (1987). Politics under the microscope: Observational methods in biopolitical research. Paper presented to Biopolitics Workshop, International Political Science Association, Warsaw, Poland, June.Google Scholar
  84. Schubert, James N., Thomas Wiegele, and Samuel Hines (1987). Age and political behavior in collective decision-making.International Political Science Review 8: 131–146.Google Scholar
  85. Stokes, Donald E., and Warren E. Miller (1966). Party government and the saliency of Congress. In Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes (ed.),Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  86. Strayer, Fred F. (1981). The organization and coordination of asymmetrical relations among young children: A biological view of social power. In M. Watts (ed.),Biopolitics: Ethological and Physiological Approaches, pp. 33–50. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 7. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  87. Sullivan, Denis G., and Roger D. Masters (1987). Emotional and cognitive reactions to watching political leaders: Experimental evidence in France and the United States. Presented to 10th meeting of International Society of Political Psychology, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  88. Sullivan, Denis G., and Roger D. Masters (1988). Happy warriors: Leader's facial displays, viewers' emotions, and political support.American Journal of Political Science 32: 345–368.Google Scholar
  89. Sullivan, Denis G., Jeffrey Pressman, Benjamin I. Page, and John D. Lyons (1974).The Politics of Representation. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  90. Sullivan, Denis G., Roger D. Masters, John T. Lanzetta, Basil G. Englis, and Gregory J. McHugo (1984). The effect of President Reagan's facial displays on observers' attitudes, impressions and feelings about him. Paper presented at meeting of American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  91. van Hooff, J.A.R.A.M. (1969). The facial displays of the catarrhyne monkeys and apes. In Desmond Morris (ed.),Primate Ethology, New York: Anchor Books, pp. 9–81.Google Scholar
  92. van Hooff, J.A.R.A.M. (1973). A structural analysis of the social behavior of a semi-captive group of chimpanzees. In Mario von Cranach and Ian Vine (eds.),Social Communication and Movement. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger D. Masters
    • 1
  • Denis G. Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GovernmentDartmouth CollegeHanover

Personalised recommendations