Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 1–16 | Cite as

On the form and universality of the contempt expression: A challenge to Ekman and Friesen's claim of discovery

  • Carroll E. Izard
  • O. Maurice Haynes
Article

Abstract

The claim of Ekman and Friesen (1986, “A New Pan- Cultural Facial Expression of Emotion,”Motivation and Emotion, 10, 159–168) that they have found the first empirical support for the existence of a pancultural expression of contempt is challenged on three grounds. First, the claim that no one else had ever attempted to describe an expression unique to contempt in any culture neglects a tradition of research dating back to Darwin. Second, the data presented by Ekman and Friesen were derived using stimuli that are ambiguous representations of their intended expressions. Finally, there are earlier data for the universality of contempt expressions. Ekman and Friesen's contempt expression may best be viewed as a learned modification of a prototypical expression evolved from the infrahuman snarl.

Keywords

Social Psychology Facial Expression Empirical Support Early Data Intended Expression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Darwin, C. R. (1872).The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray. [Reissued, 1965, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Google Scholar
  2. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975).Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial expressions. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978).The facial action coding system (FACS). Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1986). A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotion.Motivation and Emotion, 10 159–168.Google Scholar
  5. Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. R., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotions.Science, 164 86–88.Google Scholar
  6. Feleky, A. M. (1914). The expression of the emotions.Psychological Review, 21 33–41.Google Scholar
  7. Frois-Wittman, J. (1930). The judgment of facial expression.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13 113–151.Google Scholar
  8. Izard, C. E. (1971).The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  9. Izard, C. E. (1979).The maximally discriminative facial movement coding system (Max). Newark, Delaware: University of Delaware, Instructional Resources Center.Google Scholar
  10. Izard, C. E., & Malatesta, C. (in press). A theory of emotional development. In J. Osofsky (Ed.),The handbook of infant development. New York: Wiley — Interscience Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Izard, C. E., Hembree, E. A., & Huebner, R. R. (1987). Continuities and changes in two- to nineteen-month-old infants' facial expressions following acute pain.Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 105–113.Google Scholar
  12. Izard, C. E., Huebner, R. R., Risser, D., McGinnes, G., & Dougherty, L. (1980). The young infant's ability to produce discrete emotion expressions.Developmental Psychology, 16 132–140.Google Scholar
  13. Levy, H., & Schlosberg, H. (1960). Woodworth scale values of the Lightfoot pictures of facial expression.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60 121–125.Google Scholar
  14. McGrew, W. C. (1972).An ethological study of children's behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Norton-Ford, B. (1982).Adult attributions of emotion to infant behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.Google Scholar
  16. Schlosberg, H. (1941). A scale for judgment of facial expressions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29 497–510.Google Scholar
  17. Schlosberg, H. (1952). A description of facial expressions in terms of two dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44 229–237.Google Scholar
  18. Tomkins, S. S. (1964). What and where are the primary affects? Some evidence for a theory.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18 119–158.Google Scholar
  19. Tomkins, S. S. (1975). The phantasy behind the face.Journal of Personality Assessment, 39 550–562.Google Scholar
  20. Woodworth, R. S. (1938).Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carroll E. Izard
    • 1
  • O. Maurice Haynes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of DelawareNewark

Personalised recommendations