Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 113–131 | Cite as

Erectness of posture as an indicator of dominance or success in humans

  • Glenn E. Weisfeld
  • Jody M. Beresford
Article

Abstract

Darwin and others have perceived parallels between the erect bearing of proud, successful humans and the expansive demeanor of dominant animals. Various additional parallels between man and other primates in the characteristics of dominance hierarchies, the facial and postural expression of dominance, and its possible neural mediation are described. In the present study, success by human subjects in various situations was found to be reflected by erect posture. In a longitudinal study, boys who had been ranked by peers as “tough,” or dominant in agonistic encounters, in early grade school were observed to have erect posture in high school. Further, high school students who were judged by peers as successful by group standards tended to have erect posture. Finally, erectness of posture was related to performance on a college examination, with students' posture changing in erectness upon their receiving their grade. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that human competition for social success is based upon a biological capacity for dominance hierarchization.

Keywords

High School Longitudinal Study Social Psychology Human Subject High School Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramovitch, R. Attention structures in hierarchically organized groups. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.),Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction. New York: Garland, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. Argyle, M.Social interaction. New York: Atherton, 1969.Google Scholar
  3. Barkow, J. H. Social prestige and culture: A biosocial interpretation.Current Anthropology 1975,16 553–572.Google Scholar
  4. Beekman, S.The relation of gazing and smiling behaviors to status and sex in interacting pairs of children. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Chicago, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, I. S. Dominance: A theoretical perspective for ethologists. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.),Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction. New York: Garland, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. Bianchi, L.The mechanism of the brain and the function of the frontal lobes. Edinburgh: E. & S. Livingstone, 1922.Google Scholar
  7. Blurton Jones, N. G. Ethological study of some aspects of social behavior in children in nursery school. In D. Morris (Ed.)Primate ethology. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.Google Scholar
  8. Blurton Jones, N. G. Categories of child-child interaction. In N. G. Blurton Jones (Ed.),Ethological studies of child behaviour. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  9. Brody, E. B., & Rosvold, H. E. Influence of prefrontal lobotomy on social interaction in a monkey group.Psychosomatic Medicine 1952,14 406–415.Google Scholar
  10. Bull, N. The attitude theory of emotion.Nervous and Mental Disease Monograph, 1951, No. 81.Google Scholar
  11. Butter, C. M., Mishkin, M., & Mirsky, A. F. Emotional response toward humans in monkeys with selective frontal lesions.Physiology and Behavior 1968,3 213–215.Google Scholar
  12. Camras, L.The role of children's facial expressions in a conflict situation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1975.Google Scholar
  13. Camras, L. Facial expressions used by children in a conflict situation.Child Development 1977,48 1431–1435.Google Scholar
  14. Camras, L. Animal threat displays and children's facial expressions: A comparison. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.),Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction. New York: Garland, 1980.Google Scholar
  15. Chance, M. P. A. Attention structures as the basis of primate rank orders.Man 1967,2 503–518.Google Scholar
  16. Coopersmith, S. Studies in self-esteem.Scientific American 1968,218 96–106.Google Scholar
  17. Darwin, C.The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: Murray, 1872.Google Scholar
  18. Deets, A. C., Harlow, H. F., Singh, S. D., & Bloomquist, A. J. Effects of bilateral lesions of the frontal granular cortex on the social behavior of rhesus monkeys.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1970,72 452–461.Google Scholar
  19. Edelman, M. A.The stare threat in hominoids: There is more to this than meets the eye. Unpublished, University of Chicago, 1968.Google Scholar
  20. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. The myth of the aggression-free hunter and gatherer. In R. L. Holloway (Ed.),Primate aggression, territoriality, and xenophobia. New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  21. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.Ethology: The biology of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1975.Google Scholar
  22. Eisenberg, P. Expressive movements related to feelings of dominance.Archives of Psychology, 1937, No. 211.Google Scholar
  23. Ekman, P. Universals and cultural differences in facial expression of emotion. In J. K. Cole (Ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  24. Firestone, I. J., & Altman, I. Interaction territory in public places: Studies of active and passive defense. In W. H. Ittelson (Ed.),New directions in environmental design. Washington: Environmental Design Research Association, 1978.Google Scholar
  25. Firth, R. Postures and gestures of respect. In J. Pouillon & P. Maranda (Eds.),Échanges et communications; melanges offerts a Claude Levi-Strauss a L'occasion de son 60eme anniversaire. The Hague: Mouton, 1970.Google Scholar
  26. Freedman, D. G. Sexual dimorphism and the status hierarchy. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.),Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction. New York: Garland, 1980.Google Scholar
  27. Fulton, J.Frontal lobotomy and affective behavior. New York: Norton, 1951.Google Scholar
  28. Ginsburg, H. J. Playground as laboratory: Naturalistic studies of appeasement, altruism, and the omega child. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.),Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction. New York: Garland, 1980.Google Scholar
  29. Girgis, M. The orbital surface of the frontal lobe of the brain and mental disorders.Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Supplementum, 1971, 222.Google Scholar
  30. Grant, E. C. Human facial expression.Man 1969,4 525–536.Google Scholar
  31. Grünewald, G., & Mücher, H.: Über den Einfluss zentraler Funktionsaktirierung auf die Schreibmotorik.Zeitschrift für Psychopharmakolia 1964,5 372–389.Google Scholar
  32. Heckhausen, H., & Roelofsen, B. Y. Anfänge und Ehtwicklung der Leistungsmotivation: (1) Im Wetterfer des Kleinkindes.Psychologische Forschung 1962,26 313–397.Google Scholar
  33. Hinde, R. A., & Rowell, T. Communication by postures and facial expressions in the rhesus monkey(Macaca mulatta).Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1962,138 1–21.Google Scholar
  34. Izard, C. E.Human emotions. New York: Plenum, 1977.Google Scholar
  35. Jones, L. V., & Fiske, D. W. Models for testing the significance of combined results.Psychological Bulletin 1953,50 375–382.Google Scholar
  36. Keating, C. F., Mazur, A., & Segall, M. H. Facial gestures which influence the perception of status.Sociometry 1977,40 374–378.Google Scholar
  37. Kemper, T. D.A social interactional theory of emotions. New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  38. Kling, A., & Mass, R. Alterations of social behavior with neural lesions in nonhuman primates. In R. L. Holloway (Ed.),Primate aggression, territoriality, and xenophobia. New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  39. Luria, A. R.Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Plenum Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  40. Maclay, G., & Knipe, H.The dominant man. New York: Delacorte Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  41. MacLean, P. D. Psychosomatic disease and the “visceral brain”.Psychosomatic Medicine 1949,11 338–353.Google Scholar
  42. Maslow, A. H. The role of dominance in the social and sexual behavior of infra-human primates: I. Observations at Vilas Park Zoo.Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology 1936,48 261–277.Google Scholar
  43. Maslow, A. H. Dominance-feeling, behavior, and status.Psychological Review 1937,44 404–429.Google Scholar
  44. McDougall, W.An introduction to social psychology. Boston: Luce, 1921.Google Scholar
  45. Mehrabian, A. Influence of attitudes from the posture, orientation and distance of a communicator.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1968,32 296–308.Google Scholar
  46. Modigliani, A. Embarrassment, facework and eye contact: Testing a theory of embarrassment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,17: 15–24.Google Scholar
  47. Moreno, J. L. Who shall survive?Nervous and Mental Disease Monograph Series, 1934, No. 58.Google Scholar
  48. Notkin, E.Effects of orbital lesions on the social behavior of the caged stump-tailed macaque (Macaca speciosa). Unpublished master's thesis, Rutgers University, 1972.Google Scholar
  49. Omark, D. R., & Edelman, M. S.Peer group formation in young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1973.Google Scholar
  50. Omark, D. R., Strayer, F. F., & Freedman, D. G. (Eds.).Dominance relations: An ethological view of human social interaction. New York: Garland, 1980.Google Scholar
  51. Reynolds, V., & Reynolds, F. Chimpanzees of the Budongo Forest. In I. DeVore (Ed.),Primate behavior: Field studies of monkeys and apes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965.Google Scholar
  52. Ruble, D. N.Development of achievement-related judgmental processes. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Denver, 1975.Google Scholar
  53. Savin-Williams, R. C. An ethological study of dominance formation and maintenance in a group of human adolescents.Child Development 1976,47 972–979.Google Scholar
  54. Savin-Williams, R. C. Dominance hierarchies in groups of early adolescents.Child Development 1979,50 923–935.Google Scholar
  55. Savin-Williams, R. C. Dominance hierarchies in groups of middle to late adolescent males.Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1980,9 75–85.Google Scholar
  56. Schaller, G. B.The mountain gorilla: Ecology and behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  57. Schaller, G. B. The behavior of the mountain gorilla. In I. DeVore (Ed.),Primate behavior: Fields studies of monkeys and apes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965.Google Scholar
  58. Snyder, D. R. Fall from social dominance following orbital frontal ablation in monkeys.Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention, APA, 1970, 235–236.Google Scholar
  59. Snyder, R. A., & Sutker, L. W. The measurement of the construct of dominance and its relationship to nonverbal behavior.Journal of Psychology 1977,97 227–230.Google Scholar
  60. Stanley-Jones, D. The biological origin of love and hate. In M. Arnold (Ed.),Feelings and emotions. New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  61. Strayer, F. F., & Cummins, M. S. Aggressive and competitive social structures in captive monkey groups. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.),Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction. New York: Garland, 1980.Google Scholar
  62. Strayer, F. F., & Strayer, J. An ethological analysis of social agonism and dominance relations among preschool children.Child Development 1976,47 980–989.Google Scholar
  63. Strayer, F. F., Strayer, J., & Chapeskie, T. R. The perception of social power relations among preschool children. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.),Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction. New York: Garland, 1980.Google Scholar
  64. Strongman, K. T., & Champness, B. G. Dominance hierarchies and conflict in eye contact.Acta Psychologica 1968,28 376–386.Google Scholar
  65. Tomkins, S. S.Affect, imagery, consciousness (Vol. 2).The negative affects. New York: Springer, 1963.Google Scholar
  66. van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. The facial displays of the catarrhine monkeys and apes. In D. Morris (Ed.),Primate ethology. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1967.Google Scholar
  67. van Lawick-Goodall, J. A preliminary report on expressive movements and communication in the Gombe stream chimpanzees. In P. C. Jay (Ed.),Primates: Studies in adaptation and variability. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.Google Scholar
  68. Washburn, M. F.Movement and mental imagery. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1916.Google Scholar
  69. Washburn, S. L., & Hamburg, D. A. Aggressive behavior in Old World monkeys and apes. In P. Jay (Ed.),Primates: Studies in adaptation and variability. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.Google Scholar
  70. Weisfeld, G. E. Social dominance and human motivation. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.),Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction. New York: Garland, 1980.Google Scholar
  71. Weisfeld, G. E., Bloch, S. A., & Ivers, J. W.A factor analytic study of peer-perceived dominance in adolescent boys. Adolescence, in press, (a) Google Scholar
  72. Weisfeld, G. E., Bloch, S. A., & Ivers, J. W.Possible determinants of social dominance among adolescent girls. In preparation. (b)Google Scholar
  73. Weisfeld, G. E., Omark, D. R., & Cronin, C. L. A longitudinal and cross-sectional study of dominance in boys. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer & D. G. Freedman (Eds.),Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction. New York: Garland, 1980.Google Scholar
  74. Weisfeld, G. E., Omark, D. R., Ivers, J., & Freedman, D. G.Development of dominance in boys: Stability, determinants, expressions and prerogatives of rank. In preparation.Google Scholar
  75. Young, P. T.Emotion in man and animal: Its nature and dynamic basis. (2nd ed.). Huntington, New York: Krieger, 1973.Google Scholar
  76. Zimbardo, P., Pilkonis, P., & Norwood, R.The silent prison of shyness. Stanford University, 1974. (Paper distributed by Scott, Foresman College Division, Glenview, Illinois.)Google Scholar
  77. Zweigenhaft, R. L. Signature size: A key to status awareness.Journal of Social Psychology 1970,81 49–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn E. Weisfeld
    • 1
  • Jody M. Beresford
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWayne State UniversityDetroit

Personalised recommendations