Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 85–90 | Cite as

The Gourman report: Misinformation about the quality of graduate social work education

  • Charles O'Reilly
  • Rosella O'Reilly
Article

Abstract

Despite telling criticism because the author refuses to provide information about his methodology,The Gourman Report is used as an authoritative reference by prospective students and researchers in higher education. Gourman's 1985 and 1987 reports on graduate and professional education rated 31 social work programs. Ratings allegedly were based on information about such factors as teaching and library quality. Program deans, their university librarians, and offices of institutional research were asked if they shared information with Gourman. No respondent provided Gourman any information. Given their responses it seemed that at best Gourman's ratings are hypothetical. Absent evidence to the contrary, one can assume that the same holds true for all graduate and professional programs rated by Gourman.

Keywords

High Education Social Work Education Research Professional Education Work Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Birnbach, L. (1984).Lisa Birnbach's College Book. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  2. Conley, D., ed. (1984).Graduate and Professional Programs: An Overview 1985 19th ed. Princeton, NJ: Peterson's Guides.Google Scholar
  3. Dever, P. C. (1969).Office of Education Funded Teacher Institutes and Teacher Fellowship programs: FY 1965-FT 1969. Washington, DC: Office of Program Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Office of Education.Google Scholar
  4. Doughty, H. R. (1986).Guide to American Graduate Schools 5th ed. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  5. Fiske, E. B. (1986).Selective Guide to Colleges: 1986–1987 3rd ed. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  6. Gourman, J. (1980).The Gourman Report: A Rating of Graduate and Professional Programs in American and International Universities. Los Angeles: National Educational Standards. (Second rev. ed., 1982; 3rd rev. ed., 1985; 4th rev. ed., 1987.)Google Scholar
  7. Press, J. C., ed. (1986).American Library Directory. 39th ed. New York: Bowker.Google Scholar
  8. Rubin, A. (1985).Statistics on Social Work Education in the United States: 1984. Washington, DC: Council on Social Work Education.Google Scholar
  9. Trow, M. (1975).Teachers and Students: Aspects of American Higher Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Webster, D. S. (1984). Who is Jack Gourman and why is he saying those things about my college?Change 16(8): 14–56.Google Scholar
  11. Webster, D. S. (1986a). Jack Gourman's rankings of colleges and universities: a guide for the perplexed.Reference Quarterly 25(3): 323–331.Google Scholar
  12. Webster, D. S. (1986b). Ranking academic quality: the undergraduate story.Change 18(6): 34–41.Google Scholar
  13. Whiteley, S., ed. (1987). Guides to graduate and professional schools.Booklist 83(11): 824–828.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles O'Reilly
    • 1
  • Rosella O'Reilly
    • 2
  1. 1.Loyola University of ChicagoChicago
  2. 2.Wilmette Public LibraryWilmette

Personalised recommendations