Skip to main content
Log in

Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This analysis reviews the research that has been done on the connection between research productivity or scholarly accomplishment of faculty members and their teaching effectiveness (as assessed by their students). On average, there is a very small positive association between the two variables. To understand this relationship better, extant research was explored for factors that might mediate either positive or inverse associations between research productivity and teaching effectiveness and those that possibly could be common causes of them. Pedagogical practices and dispositions of faculty members, as well as certain course or class characteristics (size of class, electivity of course), were examined as potential mediating factors. Potential common causes investigated were academic rank and age of faculty members, their general ability, their personality characteristics, and the amount of time or effort they spend on research activities. The association between research productivity and teaching effectiveness was explored further by considering whether its size and direction varies by career stage of faculty members, their academic discipline, and the type of college or university in which they teach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, P. H. (1967). Justifying academic research.Science 157: 759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahern, J. (1969). Characteristics of teachers who have received an “outstanding teacher” award from New England institutions of higher education in the five year period beginning with the academic year 1963–64. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

  • Aiken, L. R., Jr. (1975). Procedures and problems in designing a college course evaluation questionnaire.College and University 50(3): 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleamoni, L. M., and Yimer, M. (1973). An investigation of the relationship between colleague rating, student rating, research productivity, and academic rank in rating instructional effectiveness.Journal of Educational Psychology 64(3): 274–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleamoni, L. M., and Yimer, M. (1974). Graduating senior ratings relationship to colleague rating, student rating, research productivity and academic rank in rating instructional effectiveness. Research Report No. 352. Urbana-Champaign, Ill.: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausell, R. B., and Magoon, J. (1972). The validation of student ratings of instruction: An institutional research model. Newark, Del.: College of Education, University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, S. (1972). Interactions between teaching and research.Universities Quarterly 26(3): 348–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T. (1974). The meaning of work in academia. In J. I. Doi (ed.),Assessing Faculty Effort (New Directions for Institutional Research No. 2), pp. 75–99. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T., and Clark, M. J. (1975). An assessment of faculty performance: Some correlates between administrator, colleague, student, and self ratings.Sociology of Education 48(2): 242–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T., and Lawrence, J. H. (1986). Aging and the quality of faculty job performance.Review of Educational Research 56(3): 265–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunstein, D. N., and Benston, G. J. (1973). Student and department chairman views of the performance of university professors.Journal of Applied Psychology 58(2): 244–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M. (1983). Teaching as performance of scholarly-based course activities: A perspective on the relationship between teaching and research.Review of Higher Education 7(1): 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresler, J. B. (1968). Teaching effectiveness and government awards.Science 160: 164–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1983). Research productivity and teaching effectiveness.Research in Higher Education 18(4): 379–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A., and Creech, F. R. (1976). The relationship between student, teacher, and course characteristics and student ratings of teacher effectiveness. PR-76-1. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. E. (1957).America's Psychologists: A Survey of a Growing Profession. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. J. (1973). Organizational stress and professional performance among faculty members at a small college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Cole, J. R., and Cole, S. (1973).Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (1976).The Sociological Method (2nd ed.). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C. D. (1974). Statistical treatment of data from student teaching evaluation questionnaires.Journal of Chemical Education 51(3): 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1965). Scientists at major and minor universities: A study in productivity and recognition.American Sociological Review 30(5): 699–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P. A., and Hillgartner, W. (1981). The relationship between student ratings and instructor behavior: Implications for improving teaching.The Canadian Journal of Higher Education 11(1): 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimmel, H. H. (1984). The myth of the teacher-scholar.Liberal Education 60(3): 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutten, G. B. (1958). The college professor as teacher.School and Society 86: 372–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, E. L. (1976). The relationships of student ratings of instruction to student, instructor and course characteristics. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 126 140)

  • Dent, P. L., and Lewis, D. J. (1976). The relationship between teaching effectiveness and measures of research quality.Educational Research Quarterly 1(3): 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faia, M. A. (1976). Teaching and research: Rapport or mésalliance.Research in Higher Education 4(3): 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1976a). Grades and college students' evaluations of their courses and teachers.Research in Higher Education 4(1): 69–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1976b). The superior college teacher from the students' view.Research in Higher Education 5(3): 243–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1977). Consistency and variability among college students in rating their teachers and courses: A review and analysis.Research in Higher Education 6(3): 223–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1978). Course characteristics and college students' ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don't.Research in Higher Education 9(3): 199–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1979). The significance of circumstances for college students' ratings of their teachers and courses.Research in Higher Education 10(2): 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1983). Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluations they receive from students.Research in Higher Education 18(1): 3–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1984). Class size and college students' evaluations of teachers and courses: A closer look.Research in Higher Education 21(1): 45–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1986). The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: A review and synthesis.Research in Higher Education 24(2): 139–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. J. (1984).The American Academic Profession: A Synthesis of Social Scientific Inquiry Since World War II. Columbus, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review.Social Studies of Science 13(2): 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R. D., Stumpf, S. A., and Aguanno, J. C. (1979). Validity of the Course-Faculty Instrument (CFI): Intrinsic and extrinsic variables.Educational and Psychological Measurement 39(1): 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, P. W. (1978). A two-dimensional analysis of student ratings of instruction.Research in Higher Education 9(1); 69–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, R. J., and Michalak, S. J., Jr. (1983). Why doesn't research improve teaching? Some answers from a small liberal arts college.Journal of Higher Education 54(2): 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, R. M., and Howell, W. H. (1954). Effective college teaching: A preliminary causal analysis.Journal of Educational Research 47(9): 683–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J. G., and Wilson, R. C. (1971). The teaching environment.AAUP Bulletin 57(4): 475–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, N. L. (1978).The Scientific Basis of the Art of Teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?Scientometrics 1: 359–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasman, N. S. and Killait, B. R., eds. (1974).Second UCSB Conference on Effective Teaching. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Graduate School of Education and Office of Instructional Development, University of California, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., and Smith, M. L. (1981).Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills, Calif. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmid, C. A., Gruber, J. E., and Wilson, E. K. (1977). Perceived Attributes of Superior Teachers (PAST): An inquiry into the giving of teacher awards.American Educational Research Journal 14(4): 423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, C. W. (1971). Faculty allocation of effort and student course evaluations.Journal of Educational Research 64(9): 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, J. S. (1972). Students' ratings of college classroom verbal interaction as related to ratings of instructor teaching effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.

  • Hammond, P. E., Meyer, J. W., and Miller, D. (1969). Teaching versus research: Sources of misperceptions.Journal of Higher Education 40(9): 682–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, L. R. (1963). The development of a criterion of scientific competence. In C. W. Taylor and F. Barron (eds.),Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development pp. 44–52. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J., and Goldner, N. S. (1972). The null relationship between teaching and research.Sociology of Education 45(1): 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. (1971). Research, teaching, and faculty fate.Science 172: 227–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, R. A. (1974). The relationship between publishing and teaching effectiveness.California Journal of Educational Research 25(3): 140–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. A. (1984a). An assessment of the teaching, research, and service function of a college faculty.Journal of Research and Development in Education 17(2): 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. A. (1984b). Correlates of faculty performance.College Student Journal 18(1): 164–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, D. P. (1974). Interrelationships among instructional effectiveness, publication record, and monetary reward.Research in Higher Education 2(1): 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, D. P., and Spangler, R. K. (1976). Faculty research involvement and instructional outcomes.Research in Higher Education 4(2): 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, H. (1955).Survey Design and Analysis. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauch, L. R. (1976). Relationships of research and teaching: Implications for faculty evaluation.Research in Higher Education 5(1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., and Riesman, D. (1968).The Academic Revolution. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., and Kulik, C. C. (1974). Student ratings of instruction.Teaching of Psychology 1(2): 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasher, H., and Vogt, K. (1974). Student evaluation: Myths and realities.Improving College and University Teaching 22(4): 267–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, L. (1959). The scholar as teacher.School and Society 87: 362–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, R. J., and Pillemer, D. B. (1984).Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsky, A. S., and Straus, M. (1975). Student evaluation, research productivity, and eminence of college faculty.Journal of Higher Education 46(1): 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, J. A., Minnis, D. L. Sandoval, J. H., and Yonge, G. D. (1977). An instrument to describe college teaching: A reliability study. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

  • Love, J. A., Sandoval, J., and Cohen, E. (1978). The generalizability and concurrent validity of an instrument to describe college teaching. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

  • Marquardt, R. A., McGann, A. F., and Jakubauskas, E. B. (1975). Academic clients, scholarly contributions, faculty compensation and performance criteria or “Shouldn't We Take One More Look Before We Leap...?”AACSB Bulletin 12(1): 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility.Journal of Educational Psychology 76(5): 707–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., and Overall J. W. (1979). Validity of students' evaluations of teaching: A comparison with instructor self evaluations by teaching assistants, undergraduate faculty and graduate faculty. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 205)

  • Maslow, A. H., and Zimmerman, W. (1956). Colege teaching ability, scholarly activity and personality.Journal of Educational Psychology 47(3): 185–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, R. D., and Roy, M. R. (1975). The contribution of noninstructional activities to college classroom teacher effectiveness.Journal of Experimental Education 44(1): 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, E. D., and Feldhusen, J. F. (1970). Relationships between faculty ratings and indexes of service and scholarship.Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 5: 619–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, E. J. (1962). Characteristics of outstanding college teachers.Journal of Higher Education 33(3): 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, L. (1956). Scientific productivity in organizational settings.Journal of Social Issues 12(2): 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalak, S. J., Jr., and Friedrich, R. J. (1981). Research productivity and teaching effectiveness at a small liberal arts college.Journal of Higher Education 52(6): 578–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, C. R. (1970). Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology.American Psychologist 25(11): 1041–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzullo, T. R., Long, J. V., and Ageloff, R. M. (1976). Paper read at the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 127 893)

  • Pillemer, D. B., and Light, R. J. (1980). Synthesizing outcomes: How to use research evidence from many studies.Harvard Educational Review 50(2): 176–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, W. T., and Sawrey, J. M. (1970). Student ratings of psychology professors as teachers and the research involvement of the professors rated.The Clinical Psychologist 23(4): 15–16, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. (1963).Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratz, H. C. (1975). Factors in the evaluation of instructors by students.IEEE Transactions on Education E-18(3): 122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. W., Jr., Ryan, B. F., and Lifshitz, M. (1950).The Student Looks at His Teacher: An Inquiry into the Implications of Student Ratings at the College Level. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1978). Combining results of independent studies.Psychological Bulletin 85(1): 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1984).Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, J. E. (1976). Teaching, publication, and rewards at a liberal arts college.Improving College and University Teaching 24(4): 238–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P., Murray, H. G., and Paunonen, S. V. (1983). Personality, research creativity, and teaching effectiveness in university professors.Scientometrics 5(2): 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sample, S. B. (1972). Inherent conflict between research and education.Educational Record 53(1): 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, H. A. (1965). Teaching and research: Companions or adversaries.Journal of Higher Education 36(8): 419–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, W. B. (1978). Admission test scores as predictors of career achievement in psychology. GRE Board Research Report No. 76-IR. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, J. J., and White, K. J. (1973). Teaching and publishing as determinants of academic salaries.Journal of Economic Education 4(2): 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., and Fiedler, F. E. (1971). The measurement of scholarly work: A critical review of the literature.Educational Record 22(3): 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, W. M., and Singhal, S. (1970). Some observations on the relationships between research productivity and student evaluations of courses and teaching.American Sociologist 5(2): 141–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, W. M., and Spencer, R. E. (1967). Rating of instructors in Accountancy 101 from video-type clips. Research Report No. 265. Urbana-Champaign, Ill.: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, J. S. (1976). A brief review of research related to the “publish or perish” ethos. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Stavridis, P. G. (1972). Relationships between student ratings of teaching effectiveness and certain criteria used in promotion of college faculty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.

  • Stumpf, S. A., Freedman, R. D., and Aguanno, J. C. (1979). A path analysis of factors often found to be related to student ratings of teaching effectiveness.Research in Higher Education 11(2): 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teague, G. V. (1981). Compatibility of teaching and research at a large land-grant university.Improving College and University Teaching 29(1): 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thielens, W., Jr. (1971). The undergraduate view of professors' research: Findings from the empirical literature. Unpublished manuscript, Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.

  • Touq, M. (1972). The relationship between student participation in classroom discussion and student ratings of instructors at the college level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.

  • Touq, M. S., and Feldhusen, J. F. (1974). Validity of student ratings of instructors.College Student Journal 8(4): 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, D. B., and Tollefson, N. (1979). A multidimensional study of effective teachers. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

  • Usher, R. H. (1966). The relationship of perceptions of self, others, and the helping task to certain measures of college faculty effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.

  • Voeks, V. W. (1962). Publications and teaching effectiveness.Journal of Higher Education 33(4): 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. S. (1986). Research productivity and classroom teaching effectiveness.Instructional Evaluation 9(1): 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widlak, F. W., McDaniel, E. D., and Feldhusen, J. F. (1973). Factor analysis of an instructor rating scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

  • Wilson, L. (1964).The Academic Man: A Study in the Sociology of a Profession. New York: Octagon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, N. J., and DeLorme, C. D., Jr. (1976). An investigation of the relationship among teaching evaluation, research and ability.Journal of Economic Education 7(2): 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. H. (1978). Student and peer ratings of college teaching and peer ratings of research and service: Four years of departmental evaluation. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

  • Woodburne, L. S. (1952). The qualifications of superior faculty members.Journal of Higher Education 23(7): 377–382.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feldman, K.A. Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Res High Educ 26, 227–298 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992241

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992241

Keywords

Navigation