Research in Higher Education

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 227–298 | Cite as

Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration

  • Kenneth A. Feldman


This analysis reviews the research that has been done on the connection between research productivity or scholarly accomplishment of faculty members and their teaching effectiveness (as assessed by their students). On average, there is a very small positive association between the two variables. To understand this relationship better, extant research was explored for factors that might mediate either positive or inverse associations between research productivity and teaching effectiveness and those that possibly could be common causes of them. Pedagogical practices and dispositions of faculty members, as well as certain course or class characteristics (size of class, electivity of course), were examined as potential mediating factors. Potential common causes investigated were academic rank and age of faculty members, their general ability, their personality characteristics, and the amount of time or effort they spend on research activities. The association between research productivity and teaching effectiveness was explored further by considering whether its size and direction varies by career stage of faculty members, their academic discipline, and the type of college or university in which they teach.


Positive Association Faculty Member Personality Characteristic Inverse Association Pedagogical Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abelson, P. H. (1967). Justifying academic research.Science 157: 759.Google Scholar
  2. Ahern, J. (1969). Characteristics of teachers who have received an “outstanding teacher” award from New England institutions of higher education in the five year period beginning with the academic year 1963–64. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  3. Aiken, L. R., Jr. (1975). Procedures and problems in designing a college course evaluation questionnaire.College and University 50(3): 247–253.Google Scholar
  4. Aleamoni, L. M., and Yimer, M. (1973). An investigation of the relationship between colleague rating, student rating, research productivity, and academic rank in rating instructional effectiveness.Journal of Educational Psychology 64(3): 274–277.Google Scholar
  5. Aleamoni, L. M., and Yimer, M. (1974). Graduating senior ratings relationship to colleague rating, student rating, research productivity and academic rank in rating instructional effectiveness. Research Report No. 352. Urbana-Champaign, Ill.: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  6. Bausell, R. B., and Magoon, J. (1972). The validation of student ratings of instruction: An institutional research model. Newark, Del.: College of Education, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  7. Black, S. (1972). Interactions between teaching and research.Universities Quarterly 26(3): 348–352.Google Scholar
  8. Blackburn, R. T. (1974). The meaning of work in academia. In J. I. Doi (ed.),Assessing Faculty Effort (New Directions for Institutional Research No. 2), pp. 75–99. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Blackburn, R. T., and Clark, M. J. (1975). An assessment of faculty performance: Some correlates between administrator, colleague, student, and self ratings.Sociology of Education 48(2): 242–256.Google Scholar
  10. Blackburn, R. T., and Lawrence, J. H. (1986). Aging and the quality of faculty job performance.Review of Educational Research 56(3): 265–290.Google Scholar
  11. Braunstein, D. N., and Benston, G. J. (1973). Student and department chairman views of the performance of university professors.Journal of Applied Psychology 58(2): 244–249.Google Scholar
  12. Braxton, J. M. (1983). Teaching as performance of scholarly-based course activities: A perspective on the relationship between teaching and research.Review of Higher Education 7(1): 21–33.Google Scholar
  13. Bresler, J. B. (1968). Teaching effectiveness and government awards.Science 160: 164–167.Google Scholar
  14. Centra, J. A. (1983). Research productivity and teaching effectiveness.Research in Higher Education 18(4): 379–389.Google Scholar
  15. Centra, J. A., and Creech, F. R. (1976). The relationship between student, teacher, and course characteristics and student ratings of teacher effectiveness. PR-76-1. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, K. E. (1957).America's Psychologists: A Survey of a Growing Profession. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, M. J. (1973). Organizational stress and professional performance among faculty members at a small college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  18. Cole, J. R., and Cole, S. (1973).Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cole, S. (1976).The Sociological Method (2nd ed.). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  20. Cornwell, C. D. (1974). Statistical treatment of data from student teaching evaluation questionnaires.Journal of Chemical Education 51(3): 155–160.Google Scholar
  21. Crane, D. (1965). Scientists at major and minor universities: A study in productivity and recognition.American Sociological Review 30(5): 699–714.Google Scholar
  22. Cranton, P. A., and Hillgartner, W. (1981). The relationship between student ratings and instructor behavior: Implications for improving teaching.The Canadian Journal of Higher Education 11(1): 73–81.Google Scholar
  23. Crimmel, H. H. (1984). The myth of the teacher-scholar.Liberal Education 60(3): 183–198.Google Scholar
  24. Cutten, G. B. (1958). The college professor as teacher.School and Society 86: 372–375.Google Scholar
  25. Delaney, E. L. (1976). The relationships of student ratings of instruction to student, instructor and course characteristics. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 126 140)Google Scholar
  26. Dent, P. L., and Lewis, D. J. (1976). The relationship between teaching effectiveness and measures of research quality.Educational Research Quarterly 1(3): 3–16.Google Scholar
  27. Faia, M. A. (1976). Teaching and research: Rapport or mésalliance.Research in Higher Education 4(3): 235–246.Google Scholar
  28. Feldman, K. A. (1976a). Grades and college students' evaluations of their courses and teachers.Research in Higher Education 4(1): 69–111.Google Scholar
  29. Feldman, K. A. (1976b). The superior college teacher from the students' view.Research in Higher Education 5(3): 243–288.Google Scholar
  30. Feldman, K. A. (1977). Consistency and variability among college students in rating their teachers and courses: A review and analysis.Research in Higher Education 6(3): 223–274.Google Scholar
  31. Feldman, K. A. (1978). Course characteristics and college students' ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don't.Research in Higher Education 9(3): 199–242.Google Scholar
  32. Feldman, K. A. (1979). The significance of circumstances for college students' ratings of their teachers and courses.Research in Higher Education 10(2): 149–172.Google Scholar
  33. Feldman, K. A. (1983). Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluations they receive from students.Research in Higher Education 18(1): 3–124.Google Scholar
  34. Feldman, K. A. (1984). Class size and college students' evaluations of teachers and courses: A closer look.Research in Higher Education 21(1): 45–116.Google Scholar
  35. Feldman, K. A. (1986). The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: A review and synthesis.Research in Higher Education 24(2): 139–213.Google Scholar
  36. Finkelstein, M. J. (1984).The American Academic Profession: A Synthesis of Social Scientific Inquiry Since World War II. Columbus, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  37. Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review.Social Studies of Science 13(2): 285–305.Google Scholar
  38. Freedman, R. D., Stumpf, S. A., and Aguanno, J. C. (1979). Validity of the Course-Faculty Instrument (CFI): Intrinsic and extrinsic variables.Educational and Psychological Measurement 39(1): 153–159.Google Scholar
  39. Frey, P. W. (1978). A two-dimensional analysis of student ratings of instruction.Research in Higher Education 9(1); 69–91.Google Scholar
  40. Friedrich, R. J., and Michalak, S. J., Jr. (1983). Why doesn't research improve teaching? Some answers from a small liberal arts college.Journal of Higher Education 54(2): 145–163.Google Scholar
  41. Frumkin, R. M., and Howell, W. H. (1954). Effective college teaching: A preliminary causal analysis.Journal of Educational Research 47(9): 683–693.Google Scholar
  42. Gaff, J. G., and Wilson, R. C. (1971). The teaching environment.AAUP Bulletin 57(4): 475–493.Google Scholar
  43. Gage, N. L. (1978).The Scientific Basis of the Art of Teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  44. Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?Scientometrics 1: 359–375.Google Scholar
  45. Glasman, N. S. and Killait, B. R., eds. (1974).Second UCSB Conference on Effective Teaching. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Graduate School of Education and Office of Instructional Development, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  46. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., and Smith, M. L. (1981).Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills, Calif. Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Goldsmid, C. A., Gruber, J. E., and Wilson, E. K. (1977). Perceived Attributes of Superior Teachers (PAST): An inquiry into the giving of teacher awards.American Educational Research Journal 14(4): 423–440.Google Scholar
  48. Grant, C. W. (1971). Faculty allocation of effort and student course evaluations.Journal of Educational Research 64(9): 405–410.Google Scholar
  49. Halstead, J. S. (1972). Students' ratings of college classroom verbal interaction as related to ratings of instructor teaching effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar
  50. Hammond, P. E., Meyer, J. W., and Miller, D. (1969). Teaching versus research: Sources of misperceptions.Journal of Higher Education 40(9): 682–690.Google Scholar
  51. Harmon, L. R. (1963). The development of a criterion of scientific competence. In C. W. Taylor and F. Barron (eds.),Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development pp. 44–52. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Harry, J., and Goldner, N. S. (1972). The null relationship between teaching and research.Sociology of Education 45(1): 47–60.Google Scholar
  53. Hayes, J. R. (1971). Research, teaching, and faculty fate.Science 172: 227–230.Google Scholar
  54. Hicks, R. A. (1974). The relationship between publishing and teaching effectiveness.California Journal of Educational Research 25(3): 140–146.Google Scholar
  55. Hoffman, R. A. (1984a). An assessment of the teaching, research, and service function of a college faculty.Journal of Research and Development in Education 17(2): 51–54.Google Scholar
  56. Hoffman, R. A. (1984b). Correlates of faculty performance.College Student Journal 18(1): 164–168.Google Scholar
  57. Hoyt, D. P. (1974). Interrelationships among instructional effectiveness, publication record, and monetary reward.Research in Higher Education 2(1): 81–88.Google Scholar
  58. Hoyt, D. P., and Spangler, R. K. (1976). Faculty research involvement and instructional outcomes.Research in Higher Education 4(2): 113–122.Google Scholar
  59. Hyman, H. (1955).Survey Design and Analysis. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  60. Jauch, L. R. (1976). Relationships of research and teaching: Implications for faculty evaluation.Research in Higher Education 5(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
  61. Jencks, C., and Riesman, D. (1968).The Academic Revolution. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  62. Kulik, J. A., and Kulik, C. C. (1974). Student ratings of instruction.Teaching of Psychology 1(2): 51–57.Google Scholar
  63. Lasher, H., and Vogt, K. (1974). Student evaluation: Myths and realities.Improving College and University Teaching 22(4): 267–269.Google Scholar
  64. Leary, L. (1959). The scholar as teacher.School and Society 87: 362–363.Google Scholar
  65. Light, R. J., and Pillemer, D. B. (1984).Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Linsky, A. S., and Straus, M. (1975). Student evaluation, research productivity, and eminence of college faculty.Journal of Higher Education 46(1): 89–102.Google Scholar
  67. Love, J. A., Minnis, D. L. Sandoval, J. H., and Yonge, G. D. (1977). An instrument to describe college teaching: A reliability study. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  68. Love, J. A., Sandoval, J., and Cohen, E. (1978). The generalizability and concurrent validity of an instrument to describe college teaching. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  69. Marquardt, R. A., McGann, A. F., and Jakubauskas, E. B. (1975). Academic clients, scholarly contributions, faculty compensation and performance criteria or “Shouldn't We Take One More Look Before We Leap...?”AACSB Bulletin 12(1): 13–17.Google Scholar
  70. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility.Journal of Educational Psychology 76(5): 707–754.Google Scholar
  71. Marsh, H. W., and Overall J. W. (1979). Validity of students' evaluations of teaching: A comparison with instructor self evaluations by teaching assistants, undergraduate faculty and graduate faculty. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 205)Google Scholar
  72. Maslow, A. H., and Zimmerman, W. (1956). Colege teaching ability, scholarly activity and personality.Journal of Educational Psychology 47(3): 185–189.Google Scholar
  73. McCullagh, R. D., and Roy, M. R. (1975). The contribution of noninstructional activities to college classroom teacher effectiveness.Journal of Experimental Education 44(1): 61–70.Google Scholar
  74. McDaniel, E. D., and Feldhusen, J. F. (1970). Relationships between faculty ratings and indexes of service and scholarship.Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 5: 619–620.Google Scholar
  75. McGrath, E. J. (1962). Characteristics of outstanding college teachers.Journal of Higher Education 33(3): 148–152.Google Scholar
  76. Meltzer, L. (1956). Scientific productivity in organizational settings.Journal of Social Issues 12(2): 32–40.Google Scholar
  77. Michalak, S. J., Jr., and Friedrich, R. J. (1981). Research productivity and teaching effectiveness at a small liberal arts college.Journal of Higher Education 52(6): 578–597.Google Scholar
  78. Myers, C. R. (1970). Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology.American Psychologist 25(11): 1041–1048.Google Scholar
  79. Pezzullo, T. R., Long, J. V., and Ageloff, R. M. (1976). Paper read at the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 127 893)Google Scholar
  80. Pillemer, D. B., and Light, R. J. (1980). Synthesizing outcomes: How to use research evidence from many studies.Harvard Educational Review 50(2): 176–195.Google Scholar
  81. Plant, W. T., and Sawrey, J. M. (1970). Student ratings of psychology professors as teachers and the research involvement of the professors rated.The Clinical Psychologist 23(4): 15–16, 19.Google Scholar
  82. Price, D. J. (1963).Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Ratz, H. C. (1975). Factors in the evaluation of instructors by students.IEEE Transactions on Education E-18(3): 122–127.Google Scholar
  84. Riley, J. W., Jr., Ryan, B. F., and Lifshitz, M. (1950).The Student Looks at His Teacher: An Inquiry into the Implications of Student Ratings at the College Level. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Rosenthal, R. (1978). Combining results of independent studies.Psychological Bulletin 85(1): 185–193.Google Scholar
  86. Rosenthal, R. (1984).Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
  87. Rossman, J. E. (1976). Teaching, publication, and rewards at a liberal arts college.Improving College and University Teaching 24(4): 238–240.Google Scholar
  88. Rushton, J. P., Murray, H. G., and Paunonen, S. V. (1983). Personality, research creativity, and teaching effectiveness in university professors.Scientometrics 5(2): 93–116.Google Scholar
  89. Sample, S. B. (1972). Inherent conflict between research and education.Educational Record 53(1): 17–22.Google Scholar
  90. Schmitt, H. A. (1965). Teaching and research: Companions or adversaries.Journal of Higher Education 36(8): 419–427.Google Scholar
  91. Schrader, W. B. (1978). Admission test scores as predictors of career achievement in psychology. GRE Board Research Report No. 76-IR. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  92. Siegfried, J. J., and White, K. J. (1973). Teaching and publishing as determinants of academic salaries.Journal of Economic Education 4(2): 90–99.Google Scholar
  93. Smith, R., and Fiedler, F. E. (1971). The measurement of scholarly work: A critical review of the literature.Educational Record 22(3): 225–232.Google Scholar
  94. Stallings, W. M., and Singhal, S. (1970). Some observations on the relationships between research productivity and student evaluations of courses and teaching.American Sociologist 5(2): 141–143.Google Scholar
  95. Stallings, W. M., and Spencer, R. E. (1967). Rating of instructors in Accountancy 101 from video-type clips. Research Report No. 265. Urbana-Champaign, Ill.: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  96. Stark, J. S. (1976). A brief review of research related to the “publish or perish” ethos. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  97. Stavridis, P. G. (1972). Relationships between student ratings of teaching effectiveness and certain criteria used in promotion of college faculty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  98. Stumpf, S. A., Freedman, R. D., and Aguanno, J. C. (1979). A path analysis of factors often found to be related to student ratings of teaching effectiveness.Research in Higher Education 11(2): 111–123.Google Scholar
  99. Teague, G. V. (1981). Compatibility of teaching and research at a large land-grant university.Improving College and University Teaching 29(1): 33–35.Google Scholar
  100. Thielens, W., Jr. (1971). The undergraduate view of professors' research: Findings from the empirical literature. Unpublished manuscript, Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  101. Touq, M. (1972). The relationship between student participation in classroom discussion and student ratings of instructors at the college level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar
  102. Touq, M. S., and Feldhusen, J. F. (1974). Validity of student ratings of instructors.College Student Journal 8(4): 2–5.Google Scholar
  103. Tracy, D. B., and Tollefson, N. (1979). A multidimensional study of effective teachers. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  104. Usher, R. H. (1966). The relationship of perceptions of self, others, and the helping task to certain measures of college faculty effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  105. Voeks, V. W. (1962). Publications and teaching effectiveness.Journal of Higher Education 33(4): 212–218.Google Scholar
  106. Webster, D. S. (1986). Research productivity and classroom teaching effectiveness.Instructional Evaluation 9(1): 14–20.Google Scholar
  107. Widlak, F. W., McDaniel, E. D., and Feldhusen, J. F. (1973). Factor analysis of an instructor rating scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  108. Wilson, L. (1964).The Academic Man: A Study in the Sociology of a Profession. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
  109. Wood, N. J., and DeLorme, C. D., Jr. (1976). An investigation of the relationship among teaching evaluation, research and ability.Journal of Economic Education 7(2): 77–80.Google Scholar
  110. Wood, P. H. (1978). Student and peer ratings of college teaching and peer ratings of research and service: Four years of departmental evaluation. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  111. Woodburne, L. S. (1952). The qualifications of superior faculty members.Journal of Higher Education 23(7): 377–382.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth A. Feldman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyState University of New YorkStony Brook

Personalised recommendations