Research in Higher Education

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 267–289

A structural model of perceived academic, personal, and vocational gains related to college student responsibility

  • Todd M. Davis
  • Patricia H. Murrell


The purpose of this paper was to develop and test a model of college gains using Pace's conceptual theory of student responsibility and perceived college environment as a guide. An analysis of student responses at 11 selected institutions was accomplished using EQS, a covariance structure modeling technique. Findings suggest that the principal determinant of student gains is the effort that students put into their academic and social experiences. This finding held for gains in general education, personal growth, and vocational preparedness. Results suggest that what students do while at college is more important in defining what is accomplished than their backgrounds. Student involvement is enhanced by the perception that the college provides a generally supportive and facilitative environment. Observed effects of major and gender are complex and suggest the importance of the microenvironment in college outcomes research. While these variables are important in understanding the process by which gains are made, they are unimportant in accounting for gains.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Astin, A. (1985).Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practices in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Bean, J. (1982). Student attrition, intentions, and confidence: Interaction effects in a path model.Research in Higher Education 17(4): 291–320.Google Scholar
  3. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., and Tarule, J. (1986).Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bentler, P. (1989).EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.Google Scholar
  5. Dubin, R. (1969).Theory Building. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Glymour, C., Scheines, R., Spirtes, P., and Kelly, K. (1987).Discovering Causal Structure. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hanneman, R. (1988).Computer Assisted Theory Building. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Kolb, D. (1984).Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Kuh, G., Schuh, J., Whitt, E., and Associates (1991).Involving Colleges. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Pace, R. (1979a).College Student Experiences, Los Angeles: UCLA Laboratory for Research on Higher Education.Google Scholar
  11. Pace, R. (1979b).Measuring Outcomes of College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Pace, R. (1984).Measuring the Quality of College Student Experiences. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation.Google Scholar
  13. Pace, R. (1987).CSEQ: Test Manual & Norms. Los Angeles. UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation.Google Scholar
  14. Pace, R. (1992).College Student Experiences Questionnaire: Norms for the Third Edition, 1990. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation.Google Scholar
  15. Pascarella, E. (1991). The impact of college on students: The nature of the evidence.Review of Higher Education 14(4): 453–466.Google Scholar
  16. Pascarella, E., and Terenzini, P. (1983). Predicting voluntary freshman year persistence/withdrawal behavior in a residential university: A path analytic validation of Tinto's model.Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 215–226.Google Scholar
  17. Pascarella, E., and Terenzini, P. (1991).How College Affects Students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Popper, K. (1961).The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Science Editions.Google Scholar
  19. Terenzini, P., and Wright, T. (1987). Influences on students' academic growth during four years of college.Research in Higher Education 26(2): 161–179.Google Scholar
  20. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research.Review of Educational Research 45: 89–125.Google Scholar
  21. Van Dalen, D. (1966).Understanding Educational Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Todd M. Davis
    • 1
  • Patricia H. Murrell
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Higher EducationUniversity of North TexasDenton
  2. 2.Center for the Study of Higher EducationMemphis State UniversityMemphis

Personalised recommendations