Political Behavior

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 364–376

The dimensionality of partisan strength and political independence

  • Sheldon Kamieniecki
Article
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

This study explores the dimensionality of partisan strength and independence by analyzing the relationships between the traditional four-point partisan strength scale, a strength of independence scale, and other relevant variables in the 1980 and 1984 NES/CPS election studies. In particular, the investigation centers on the possible different explanations for independence. The findings tend to support explanations for independence that concern party attachment and civic responsibility. The data show that partisan strength and independence are separate components of party identification. Previous findings based on the use of the traditional partisan strength scale may therefore need to be reconsidered.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson, Paul R. (1976). Generational change and the decline of party identification in America: 1952–1974.American Political Science Review 70: 469–478.Google Scholar
  2. Abramson, Paul R. (1979). Developing party identification: a further examination of life-cycle, generational, and period effects.American Journal of Political Science 23: 78–96.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald (1960).The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, Jacob, and Cohen, Patricia (1975).Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Converse, Philip (1976).The Dynamics of Party Support. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Dennis, Jack (1988a). Political independence in America, Part 1: on being an independent partisan supporter.British Journal of Political Science 18: 77–109.Google Scholar
  7. Dennis, Jack (1988b). Political independence in America, Part 2: towards a theory.British Journal of Political Science 18: 197–219.Google Scholar
  8. Kamieniecki, Sheldon (1985).Party Identification, Political Behavior, and the American Electorate. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  9. Katz, Richard S. (1979). The dimensionality of party identification: cross-national perspectives.Comparative Politics 11: 147–163.Google Scholar
  10. Keith, Bruce, Magleby, David, Nelson, Candice, Orr, Elizabeth, Westlye, Mark, and Wolfinger, Raymond (1986). The partisan affinities of independent “leaners.”British Journal of Political Science 16: 155–185.Google Scholar
  11. King, James D. (1981). Comparing local and presidential elections.American Politics Quarterly 9: 277–290.Google Scholar
  12. Milbrath, Lester, and Goel, M. Lal (1977).Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics? Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, Arthur H., and Wattenberg, Martin P. (1983). Measuring party identification: Independent or no partisan preference?American Journal of Political Science 27: 106–121.Google Scholar
  14. Petrocik, John R. (1974). An analysis of intransitivities in the index of party identification.Political Methodology 1: 31–47.Google Scholar
  15. Pomper, Gerald (1975).Voter's Choice: Varieties of American Electoral Behavior. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
  16. Shively, W. Phillips (1979). The development of party identification among adults: exploration of a functional model.American Political Science Review 73: 1039–1054.Google Scholar
  17. Sigel, Roberta S. (1964). Effect of partisanship on the perception of political candidates.Public Opinion Quarterly 28: 483–496.Google Scholar
  18. Valentine, David C., and Van Wingen, John R. (1980). Partisanship, independence, and the partisan identification question.American Politics Quarterly 8: 165–186.Google Scholar
  19. Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman H. (1972).Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  20. Wattenberg, Martin P. (1986).The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1984. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Weisberg, Herbert F. (1980). A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification.Political Behavior 2: 33–60.Google Scholar
  22. Weisberg, Herbert F. (1983). A new scale of partisanship.Political Behavior 5: 363–376.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheldon Kamieniecki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations