Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 67–82 | Cite as

What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype

  • Miron Zuckerman
  • Robert E. Driver


Two studies examined the effects of attractiveness of voice and physical appearance on impressions of personality. Subject-senders were videotaped as they read a standard-content text (Study 1) or randomly selected texts (Study 2). Judges rated the senders' vocal attractiveness from the auditory portion of the tape and their physical attractiveness from the visual portion of the tape. Other judges rated the senders' personality on the basis of their voice, face, or face plus voice. Senders with more attractive voices were rated more favorably in both the voice and face plus voice conditions; senders with more attractive faces were rated more favorably in both the face and face plus voice conditions. The effects of both vocal and physical attractiveness were more pronounced in the single channels (voice condition and face condition, respectively) than in the multiple channel (face plus voice condition). Possible antecedents and consequences of the vocal attractiveness stereotype are discussed. p]Her voice was ever soft, gentle, and low, an excellent thing in woman.

Shakespeare (King Lear, Act V, Sc. 3)


Social Psychology Single Channel Physical Appearance Multiple Channel Physical Attractiveness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, G.R. (1977). Physical attractiveness research: Toward a developmental social psychology of beauty.Human Development, 20, 217–239.Google Scholar
  2. Addington, D.W. (1968). The relationship of selected vocal characteristics to personality perception.Speech Monographs, 35, 492–503.Google Scholar
  3. Allport, G.W., & Cantril, H. (1934). Judging personality from voice.Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 37–54.Google Scholar
  4. Aronovitch, C.D. (1976). The voice of personality: Stereotyped judgments and their relation to voice quality and sex of speaker.The Journal of Social Psychology, 99, 207–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bales, R.F. (1970).Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  6. Bass, B.M. (1960).Leadership, psychology, and organizational behavior. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  7. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 158–215). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. DePaulo, B.M., Rosenthal, R., Eisenstat, R.A., Rogers, P.L., & Finkelstein, S. (1978). Decoding discrepant nonverbal cues.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 313–323.Google Scholar
  9. Dion, K.K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Driver, R. (1987).The voice in person perception: An investigation of the vocal attractiveness stereotype. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., O'Sullivan, M., & Scherer, K. (1980). Relative importance of face, body, and speech in judgments of personality and affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 270–277.Google Scholar
  12. Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986).Mirror, mirror ... the importance of looks in everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kramer, E. (1964). Personality stereotypes in voice: A reconsideration of the data.The Journal of Social Psychology, 62, 247–251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Krauss, R.M., Apple, W., Morency, N., Wenzel, C., & Winton, W. (1981). Verbal, vocal, and visible factors in judgments of another's affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 312–319.Google Scholar
  15. Larrance, D.T., & Zuckerman, M. (1981). Facial attractiveness and vocal likability as determinants of nonverbal sending skills.Journal of Personality, 49, 349–362.Google Scholar
  16. McGrath, J.E., & Julian, J.W. (1963). Interaction process and task outcome in experimentally created negotiation groups.Journal of Psychological Studies, 14, 117–138.Google Scholar
  17. Mehrabian, A. (1970). A semantic space for nonverbal behavior.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 248–257.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, G.R., & Hewgill, M.A. (1964). The effect of variations in nonfluency on audience ratings of source credibility.Quarterly Journal of Speech, 50, 36–44.Google Scholar
  19. Osgood, C.E. (1966). Dimensionality of the semantic space for communication via facial expressions.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 7, 1–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957).The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pearce, W.B., & Conklin, F. (1971). Nonverbal vocalic communication and perceptions of a speaker.Speech Monographs, 38, 235–241.Google Scholar
  22. Rosenthal, R., Hall, J.A., DiMatteo, M.R., Rogers, P.L., & Archer, D. (1979).Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (1984).Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. (1982). A single, generous purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect.Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166–169.Google Scholar
  25. Scherer, K.R. (1972). Judging personality from voice: A cross-cultural approach to an old issue in inter-personal perception.Journal of Personality, 40, 191–210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Scherer, K.R. (1974a). Acoustic concomitants of emotional dimensions: Judging affect from synthesized tone sequences. In S. Weitz (Ed.),Nonverbal communication (pp. 249–253.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Scherer, K.R. (1974b). Voice quality analysis of American and German speakers.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 281–297.Google Scholar
  28. Scherer, K.R. (1979). Voice and speech correlates of perceived social influence. In H. Giles & R.N. St. Clair (Eds.),Language and social psychology (pp. 88–120). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  29. Scherer, K.R. (1986). Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research.Psychological Bulletin, 99, 143–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Scherer, K.R., & Oshinsky, J. (1977). Cue utilization in emotion attribution from auditory stimuli.Motivation and Emotion, 1, 331–346.Google Scholar
  31. Sereno, K.K., & Hawkins, G.J. (1967). The effects of variations in speakers' nonfluency upon audience ratings of attitude toward the speech topic and speaker's credibility.Speech Monographs, 34, 58–64.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, B.L., Brown, B.L., Strong, W.J., & Rencher, A.C. (1975). Effects of speech rate on personality perception.Language and Speech, 18, 145–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Snyder, M., Tanke, E., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.Google Scholar
  34. Sorell, G.T., & Nowak, C.A. (1981). The role of physical attractiveness as a contributor of individual development. In R.M. Lerner & N.A. Busch-Rossnagel (Eds.),Individuals as producers of their development: A life-span perspective (pp. 389–446). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Stein, R.T. (1975). Identifying emergent leaders from verbal and nonverbal communications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 125–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Stein, R.T., Geis, F.L., & Damarin, F. (1973). Perception of emergent leadership hierarchies in task groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 77–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zuckerman, M., Amidon, M.D., Biship, S.E., & Pomerantz, S.D. (1982). Face and tone of voice in the communication of deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 347–357.Google Scholar
  38. Zuckerman, M., DeFrank, R.S., Hall, J.A., Larrance, D.T., & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Facial and vocal cues of deception and honesty.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 378–396.Google Scholar
  39. Zuckerman, M., Larrance, D.T., Hall, J.A., DeFrank, R.S., & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Posed and spontaneous communication of emotion via facial and vocal cues.Journal of Personality, 47, 712–733.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miron Zuckerman
    • 1
  • Robert E. Driver
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of RochesterRochester
  2. 2.Philip Morris U.S.A.Richmond

Personalised recommendations