Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 8, Issue 9, pp 1167–1181 | Cite as

Nerol: An alarm substance of the stingless bee,Trigona fulviventris (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

  • L. K. Johnson
  • D. F. Wiemer
Article

Abstract

Bees of the genusTrigona and subgenusTrigona possess volatile materials in their mandibular glands, used as alarm substances and as marking pheromones. Heads of workers ofTrigona fulviventris were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The two major volatile components were nerol (∼ 50%), and octyl caproate (∼ 20%). Relative to other substances tested at a Costa Rican nest, treatments containing 20 μg of nerol attractedT. fulviventris, depressed numbers of bees leaving the nest by about 50%, and elicited wing vibration and biting. The responses were similar to those obtained with the contents of one worker head. Attraction and biting were also seen in response to captures of colony members by assassin bugs (Apiomerus pictipes) outside a nest entrance; one bee responded in about 15% of the captures. This alarm behavior, although weak, is of interest since it was thought thatT. fulviventris was unusual for its subgenus in its lack of nest defense behaviors.

Key words

Alarm substance nest defense nerol mandibular gland Hymenoptera Apidae Meliponinae stingless bees Trigona fulviventris Apiomerus pictipes Hemiptera Reduviidae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baroni Urbani, C. 1979. Territoriality in social insects, pp. 91–120,in H.R. Hermann (ed.). Social Insects. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Blum, M.S. 1966. Chemical releasers of social behavior. VIII. Citral in the mandibular gland secretion ofLestrimelitta limao.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 59:962–964.Google Scholar
  3. Blum, M.S. 1970. The chemical basis of insect sociality, pp. 61–94,in M. Beroza (ed.). Chemicals Controlling Insect Behavior. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Blum, M.S., andBrand, J.M. 1972. Social insect pheromones: Their chemistry and function.Am. Zool. 12:553–576.Google Scholar
  5. Blum, M.S., Crewe, R.M., Kerr, W.E., Keith, L.H., Garrison, A.W., andWalker, M.M. 1970. Citral in stingless bees: Isolation and functions in trail-laying and robbing.J. Insect Physiol 16:1637–1648.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, A.M., Rinderer, T.E., Tucker, K.W., Sylvester, H.A., andLackett, J.J. 1980. A model of honeybee defensive behaviour.J. Apic. Res. 19:224–231.Google Scholar
  7. Darchen, R. 1966. Sur l'éthologie deTrigona (Dactylurina)staudingeri.Biol. Gabonica 2:37–45.Google Scholar
  8. Hertz, M. 1930. Die Organisation des optischen Feldes bei der Biene, II.Z. Vergl. Physiol. 11:107–145.Google Scholar
  9. Hertz, M. 1935. Zur Physiologie des Formen- und Bewegungssehens. III. Figurale Unterscheidung und reziproke Dressuren bei der Biene.Z. Vergl. Physiol. 21:604–615.Google Scholar
  10. Hubbell, S. P., andJohnson, L. K. 1977. Competition and nest spacing in a tropical stingless bee community.Ecology 58:949–963.Google Scholar
  11. Hubbell, S.P., andJohnson, L.K. 1978. Comparative foraging behavior of six stingless bee species exploiting a standardized resource.Ecology 59:1123–1136.Google Scholar
  12. Jacobs-Jessen, U.F. 1959. Zur Orientierung der Hummeln und einiger anderer Hymenopteren.Z. Vergl. Physiol. 41:597–641.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, L.K. 1974. The role of agonistic behavior in the foraging strategies ofTrigona bees. Doctoral thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, L.K. 1980. Alarm response of foragingTrigona fulviventris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) to mandibular gland components of competing bee species.J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 53:357–362.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, L. K. 1982a. Foraging strategies and the structure of stingless bee communities in Costa Rica,in P. Jaisson (ed.). Social Insects in the Tropics. In press.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, L.K. 1982b. The costly extermination of aTrigona fulviventris colony by nest-robbing bees.Biotropica. In press.Google Scholar
  17. Kerr, W.E., andde Lello, E. 1962. Sting glands in stingless bees—a vestigial character.J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 70:190–214.Google Scholar
  18. Koeniger, N. 1975. Observations on alarm behavior and colony defense ofApis dorsata. Proc. Symp. I.U.S.S.I., Dijon, 1975, pp. 153–154.Google Scholar
  19. Leuthold, R.H., andSchlunegger, U. 1973. The alarm behaviour from the mandibular gland secretion in the antCrematogaster scutellaris.Insectes Soc. 20:205–214.Google Scholar
  20. Luby, J.M., Regnier, F.E., Clarke, E.T., Weaver, E.C., andWeaver, N. 1973. Volatile cephalic substances of the stingless bees,Trigona mexicana andTrigona pectoralis. J. Insect Physiol. 19:1111–1127.Google Scholar
  21. Michener, C.D. 1946. Notes on the habits of some Panamanian stingless bees.J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 54:179–197.Google Scholar
  22. Michener, C.D. 1974. The Social Behavior of the Bees. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  23. Moser, J.C., Brownlee, R.C., andSilverstein, R. 1968. Alarm pheromones of the antAtta texana.J. Insect Physiol. 14:529–535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nogueira-Neto, P. 1970. Behavior problems related to the pillages made by some parasitic stingless bees (Meliponinae, Apidae), pp. 416–434,in L.R. Aronson, E. Tobach, D.S. Lehrman, and J.S. Rosenblatt, (eds.). Development and Evolution of Behavior, Essays in Memory of T.C. Schneirla, Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  25. Pickett, J.A., Williams, I.H., Martin, A.P., andSmith, M.C. 1980. Nasonov pheromone of the honey bee,Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Part I. Chemical characterization.J. Chem. Ecol. 6:425–434.Google Scholar
  26. Rau, P. 1933. The Jungle Bees and Wasps of Barro Colorado Island. Van Hoffman Press, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
  27. Sakagami, S., andAkahira, Y. 1959. Studies on the Japanese honeybee,Apis cerana cerana Fabricius. VIII. Two opposing adaptations in the post-stinging behavior of honeybees.Evolution 14:29–40.Google Scholar
  28. Schwarz, H.F. 1948. Stingless bees (Meliponidae) of the Western Hemisphere.Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 90:1–546.Google Scholar
  29. Shearer, D.A., andBoch, R. 1966. Citralin the Nassanoff pheromone of the honeybee.J. Insect Physiol. 12:1513–1521.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, B.H. andRoubik, D.W. 1982. Skatole and 2-heptanol as alarm pheromones in two species ofMelipona (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  31. Weaver, E.C., Clarke, E.T., andWeaver, N. 1975a. Attractiveness of an assassin bug to stingless bees.J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 48:17–18.Google Scholar
  32. Weaver, N., Weaver, E.C., andClarke, E.T. 1975b. Reactions of five species of stingless bees to some volatile chemicals and to other species of bees.J. Insect Physiol. 21:479–494.Google Scholar
  33. Wille, A. 1965. Las abejas attará de la región mesoamericana del género y subgéneroTrigona (Apidae-Meliponini).Rev. Biol. Trop. 13:271–291.Google Scholar
  34. Wille, A., andMichener, C.D. 1973. The nest architecture of stingless bees with special reference to those of Costa Rica.Rev. Biol. Trop. 21(Supl. 1): 1–278.Google Scholar
  35. Wilson, E.O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  36. Wilson, E.O., andBossert, W.H. 1963. Chemical communication among animals.Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 19:673–716.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. K. Johnson
    • 1
  • D. F. Wiemer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyThe University of IowaIowa City
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryThe University of IowaIowa City

Personalised recommendations