Skip to main content
Log in

Neglected voices and excessive demands in feminist research

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Margo. “The History of Women and the History of Statistics.”Journal of Women's History 1992,4(1): 14–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. Bernard. “Florence Nightingale,”Scientific American March 1984, 250: 128–132+, bibliography p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Marion, and Stone, Mervyn. “Nightingale on Quetelet: The Passionate Statistician,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, vol. 144, 1981 (part I: 66–70; part II: 176–215; part III; 332–351).

  • Gilligan, Carol.In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney, and Strauss, Anselm.The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie Russell.The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, Joan.A Stranger in her Native Land: Alice Fletcher and the American Indians. Lincoln, Neb: University of Nebraska Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaron, Toni A. H. (ed.).The Sister Bond: A Feminist View of a Timeless Connection. New York: Pergamon Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Jean Baker.Toward a New Psychology of Women. Boston: Beacon, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, Ann. “Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms,” in Helen Roberts (ed.).Doing Feminist Research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, Mary Louise. “Fieldwork in Common Places,” in James Clifford and George Marcus (eds.).Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ptacek, James. “Why Do Men Batter Their Wives?,” in Kersti Yllo and Michele Bograd (eds.).Feminist Perspectives in Wife Abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, Shulamit. “Experiential Analysis: A Contribution to Feminist Methodology,” in Gloria Bowles and Renate Duelli Klein (eds.).Theories of Women's Studies. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, Shulamit. “Feminist Distrust: Problems of Content and Context in Sociological Research,” in David Berg and Ken Smith (eds.).The Self in Social Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985/1988, pp. 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, Shulamit.Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. (with the assistance of Lynn Davidman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, Shulamit.On Becoming a Social Scientist: From Survey Research and Participant Observation to Experiential Analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1979/1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, Shulamit. “So-called Training in the So-called Alternative Paradigm,” in Egon Guba (ed.).The Paradigm Dialogue Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Diana E. H.Rape in Marriage. New York: Macmillan, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, Ronnie, “Dilemmas of Advocacy Research: Experiences with Comparable Worth,” Paper prepared for Plenary Panel: Social Science Research and Law Reform, Law and Society Association, 1987.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reinharz, S. Neglected voices and excessive demands in feminist research. Qual Sociol 16, 69–76 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990074

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990074

Keywords

Navigation