Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 31–48 | Cite as

Gratuitous language in appellate cases involving gay people: “Queer bating” from the bench

  • Lawrence Goldyn
Article

Abstract

An examination of appellate cases—state and federal—where homosexual behavior is under judicial scrutiny suggests that gay litigants are frequently the targets of gratuitous asides. Such language takes various forms. It also occurs with varying frequency depending on the type of case (criminal, employment discrimination, immigration and naturalization, licensing and incorporation, marriage, or child custody) under examination. The incidence of such language also varies with the level of the court involved (state vs. federal), and it also varies temporally, showing a general decline with the advance of time. The presence of such language is employed as an indicator of the legitimacy accorded gay litigants in the courtroom. Within this context, the impact and efficacy of litigation on behalf of gay people is also assessed.

Keywords

General Decline Employment Discrimination Homosexual Behavior Political Psychology Child Custody 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blackstone, William (1811).Commentaries on the Laws of England, Vol. 4. London: William Reed.Google Scholar
  2. Cantor, D. J. (1964). “Deviation and the Criminal Law.”Journal of Criminology and Police Science 55: 446.Google Scholar
  3. Coke, Edward (1917).Institutes of the Laws of England, Vol. 3, London: W. Clark & Sons.Google Scholar
  4. Frank, Jerome (1949).Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Goldyn, Lawrence (1979). “Legal Ideology and the Regulation of Homosexual Behavior.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  6. Hollis, John L. (1968). “Criminal Law—Sexual Offenses—Sodomy—Cunnilingus.”Natural Resources Journal 8: 536.Google Scholar
  7. Hyde, H. Montgomery (1956).The Three Trials of Oscar Wilde. New York: University Books.Google Scholar
  8. Levitt, Eugene E., and Albert D. Klassen (1974). “Public Attitudes Toward Homosexuality: Part of the 1970 National Survey by the Institute for Sex Research.”Journal of Homosexuality 1: 38.Google Scholar
  9. Lipsky, Michael (1968). “Protest as a Political Resource.”APSR 62 (December): 1144–1158.Google Scholar
  10. McConnell, Grant (1966).Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960).The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  12. Weinberg, George (1973).Society and the Healthy Homosexual. New York: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
  13. Wilkinson, J. Harvie, III, and G. Edward White (1977). “Constitutional Protection for Personal Lifestyles.”Cornell Law Review 62: 595–596.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence Goldyn
    • 1
  1. 1.Political Science DepartmentOccidental CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations