Political Behavior

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 147–161

Consensus, constraint, and political polarization in recent presidential elections

  • Robert Emmett Darcy
Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

By reexamining the structure of political attitudes among Americans in the period 1956–72, using both the items and coding scheme as given inThe Changing American Voter (1976) by Nie and his associates and using only domestic attitude items, but including all available responses, we have found that the major type of change between the 1950s and the 1970s is not an increase in internal constraint (ideological thinking of any sort) but an increase in political attitude polarization. Further, this analysis indicates that when interitem associations are used to measure constraints present in the entire population, a major source of political attitude constraint is ignored—the constraints present within the social, political and demographic groupings within the society. The major types of attitude constraints in our society are likely to be external to the attitudes themselves. Understanding electoral outcomes will necessitate understanding the nature of electoral coalitions formed across social and political groupings.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achen, C. (1975) “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.”American Political Science Review 69: 1218–1231.Google Scholar
  2. Aigner, H., and R. Darcy (1977) “EAT: A PL/1 Entropy Analysis Program.”Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 9: 541–542.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, K., and S. Thorson (1978) “Measuring Political Constraint.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  4. Balch, G. (1979) “Statistical Manipulation in the Study of Issue Consistency: The Gamma Coefficient.”Political Behavior 1: 217–241.Google Scholar
  5. Barton, A., and R. Parsons (1977). “Measuring Belief System Structure.”Public Opinion Quarterly 41: 159–180.Google Scholar
  6. Bishop, G., A. Tuchfarber, and R. Oldendick (1978) “Change in the Structure of American Political Attitudes: The Nagging Question of Question Wording.”American Journal of Political Science 22: 250–269.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, A., P. Converse, W. Miller, and D. Stokes (1960)The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Converse, P. (1964) “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In D. Apter, (Ed.),Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press, pp. 206–261.Google Scholar
  9. Darcy, R., and H. Aigner (1977) “EAT: Entropy Analysis Technique.”Journal of Marketing Research 14: 416–419.Google Scholar
  10. Darcy, R., and H. Aigner (1980) “The Uses of Entropy in the Multivariate Analysis of Categorical Variables.”American Journal of Political Science 24: 155–174.Google Scholar
  11. Francis, J., and L. Busch (1975) “What We Know About ‘I Don't Knows’.”Public Opinion Quarterly 39: 207–218.Google Scholar
  12. Garner, W. (1962)Uncertainty and Structure as Psychological Concepts. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. LeBlanc, H., and M. Merrin (1977) “Mass Belief Systems Revised.”Journal of Politics 39: 1082–1087.Google Scholar
  14. Luttbeg, N. (1968) “The Structure of Beliefs Among Leaders and the Public.”Public Opinion Quarterly 32: 398–409.Google Scholar
  15. Marcus, G., D. Tabb, and J. Sullivan (1974) “The Structure and Content of Political Ideologies: A Multidimensional Approach.”American Journal of Political Science 18: 405–420.Google Scholar
  16. Nie, N., with K. Andersen (1974) “Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Political Change and Attitude Structure.”Journal of Politics 36: 504–591.Google Scholar
  17. Nie, N., and D. Rabjohn (1979) “Revising Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Or, Doing Research is Like Watching a Tennis Match.”American Journal of Political Science 23: 139–175.Google Scholar
  18. Nie, N., S. Verba, and J. Petrocik (1976)The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Petrocik, J. (1980) “Contextual Sources of Voting Behavior: the Changeable American Voter.” In J. Pierce and J. Sullivan (Eds.),The Electorate Reconsidered. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, pp. 257–277.Google Scholar
  20. Pierce, J., and P. Hagner (1980) “Change in the Public's Political Thinking: The Watershed Years, 1956–1968.” In J. Pierce and J. Sullivan (Eds.),The Electorate Reconsidered. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, pp. 59–90.Google Scholar
  21. Pierce, J., and D. Rose (1974) “Nonattitudes and American Public Opinion: The Examination of a Thesis.”American Political Science Review 68: 626–649.Google Scholar
  22. Pomper, G. (1972) “From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968.”American Political Science Review 66: 415–428.Google Scholar
  23. Searing, D., J. Schwartz, and A. Lind (1973) “The Structuring Principle: Political Socialization and Belief Systems.”American Political Science Review 67: 415–432.Google Scholar
  24. Sullivan, J., J. Pierson, and G. Marcus (1978) “Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public: A Methodological Critique and Some New Findings.”American Journal of Political Science 22: 233–249.Google Scholar
  25. Watanabe, S. (1969)Knowing and Guessing: A Quantitative Study of Inference and Information. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Weissberg, R. (1976) “Consensual Attitudes and Attitude Structure.”Public Opinion Quarterly 40: 349–359.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Emmett Darcy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceOklahoma State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations