Philosophical Studies

, Volume 74, Issue 2, pp 193–219 | Cite as

Structured characters and complex demonstratives

  • David Braun
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braun, David (1993) “Empty Names”,Nous 27, 449–469.Google Scholar
  2. Braun, David (Forthcoming) “What Is Character?”,Journal of Philosophical Logic.Google Scholar
  3. Crimmins, Mark (1992)Talk About Beliefs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Crimmins, Mark and Perry, John (1989) “The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs”,Journal of Philosophy 86, 685–711.Google Scholar
  5. Kaplan, David (1989a) “Demonstratives”. In: Joseph Almog, John Perry and Howard Wettstein (eds.)Themes from Kaplan, pp. 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kaplan, David (1989b) “Afterthoughts”. In: Joseph Almog, John Perry and Howard Wettstein (eds.)Themes from Kaplan, pp. 565–614. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kripke, Saul (1977) “Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference”. In: Peter French, Theodore Uehling, Jr. and Howard Wettstein (eds.)Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 6–27. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Reprinted in A. P. Martinich (ed.) (1990)The Philosophy of Language (2nd Ed.), pp. 248–267. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Perry, John (1977) “Frege on Demonstratives”,The Philosophical Review 86, 474–497.Google Scholar
  9. Reimer, Marga (1991) “Demonstratives, Demonstrations, and Demonstrata”,Philosophical Studies 63, 187–202.Google Scholar
  10. Richard, Mark (1983) “Direct Reference and Ascriptions of Belief”,Journal of Philosophical Logic 12, 425–452.Google Scholar
  11. Richard, Mark (1990)Propositional Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Richard, Mark (1993) “Articulated Terms”,Philosophical Perspectives 7, 207–230.Google Scholar
  13. Salmon, Nathan (1986)Frege's Puzzle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Soames, Scott (1987) “Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content”,Philosophical Topics 15, 47–87. Reprinted in Nathan Salmon and Scott Soames (eds.) (1988)Propositions and Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Soames, Scott (1989) “Semantics and Semantic Competence”,Philosophical Perspectives 3, 575–596.Google Scholar
  16. Wettstein, Howard (1984) “How to Bridge the Gap Between Meaning and Reference”,Synthese 58, 63–84. Reprinted in Howard Wettstein (1991)Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake? Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Braun
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations