Abstract
The English Bulldog is introduced as a cultural product through ethnographic description. Its peculiar physiology relates to its social meanings and three categories of the dog are discerned: show dogs, celebrities, and pets. Each type of dog embodies a selective character, which is depicted and then analyzed in terms of ambiguous semantic categories. As a cultural product, the Bulldog is a living symbol of ambiguous relationships between society and nature. In the context of everyday life, it provides an occasion for understanding these relationships.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, D. 1971 “Cats and Dogs and People,”Transaction. Vol 6 (February): 44–47.
Douglas, M. 1975 “Do Dogs Laugh?” pp. 83–89 in Mary Douglas (ed.)Implicit Meanings. London: Routledge, Kegan Paul.
Fine, G.A. (forthcoming) “Trivial Pursuits: Mushroom Clubs and the Culture of Nature.” Unpublished manuscript.
Goffman, E. 1974Frame Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hickrod, L.H.H. and R.L. Schmitt 1982 “A Naturalistic Study of Interaction and Frame: The Pet as ‘Family Member,’”Urban Life: A Journal of Ethnographic Research 11:55–77.
Leach, E. 1964 “Anthropological Aspects of Language: Animal Categories and Verbal Abuse,” pp. 23–63 in E.H. Lenneberg (ed.)New Directions in the Study of Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Perin, C. 1988Belonging in America: Reading Between the Lines. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Scott, J.P. and J.L. Fuller 1965Dog Behavior: The Genetic Basis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
T.F.H. 1980Bulldogs. Neptune City, NJ: T.F.H. Publications, Inc.
Tuan, Y. 1984Dominance and Affection: The Making of Pets. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Special thanks to Anne Sutherland for introducing to me structural analysis of the meanings of animals in culture.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nash, J.E. What's in a face? The social character of the English Bulldog. Qual Sociol 12, 357–370 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989397
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989397