Political Behavior

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 37–51 | Cite as

Cross-pressured economic voting in America: The 1984 election

  • J. David Gopoian
  • Thom Yantek


Prior work on U.S. presidential elections has concluded consistently that voter evaluations of national economic conditions have had a greater impact on electoral outcomes than have perceptions of personal economic situations. Utilizing data from the 1984 National Election Study, we find confirmatory evidence for such a pattern. A more disaggreated examination of voters and their economic perceptions for that year, however, reveals some important refinements of earlier findings. Specifically, there is a sizable minority for whom personal economic conditions appear to matter more. Further, the role of noneconomic issue voting in distinguishing economic groups, a topic which has been largely ignored up to this point, is found to be quite pronounced — overriding, in several instances, the influence even of partisan and economic predispositions.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abramson, P., Aldrich, J., and Rohde, D. (1985).Change and Continuity in the 1984 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bloom, H., and Price, H. (1975). Voter response to short-run economic conditions: the asymmetric effect of prosperity and recession.The American Political Science Review 69: 1240–1254.Google Scholar
  3. Brody, R., and Page, B. (1972). Comment: the assessment of policy voting.The American Political Science Review 66: 450–458.Google Scholar
  4. Conover, P., and Feldman, S. (1986). Emotional reactions to the economy.American Journal of Political Science 30:50–78.Google Scholar
  5. Downs, A. (1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  6. Feldman, S. (1982). Economic self-interest and political behavior.American Journal of Political Science 26: 446–466.Google Scholar
  7. Feldman, S. (1984). Economic self-interest and the vote.Political Behavior 6: 229–251.Google Scholar
  8. Keeter, S. (1985). Public opinion in 1984. In G. Pomper (ed.),The Election of 1984. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, pp. 91–111.Google Scholar
  9. Key, V. (1949).Southern Politics. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  10. Kinder, D., and Kiewiet, D. (1979). Economic discontent and political behavior: the role of personal grievances and collective economic judgments in congressional voting.American Journal of Political Science 23: 295–527.Google Scholar
  11. Kinder, D., and Kiewiet, D. (1981). Sociotropic politics.British Journal of Political Science 11: 129–161.Google Scholar
  12. Kinder, D., and Mebane, W. (1983). Politics and economics in everyday life. In K. Monroe (ed.),The Political Process and Economic Change, pp. 141–180. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Longman, P. (1982). Taking America to the cleaners.The Washington Monthly (November).Google Scholar
  14. Quirk, P. (1985). The economy: economists, electoral politics, and Reagan economics. In M. Nelson (ed.),The Elections of 1984, pp. 155–188. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  15. Schattschneider, E. (1975).The Semisovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.Google Scholar
  16. Weatherford, M. (1983). Economic voting and the “symbolic politics” argument: a reinterpretation and synthesis.The American Political Science Review 77: 158–174.Google Scholar
  17. Wright, G., and Berkman, M. (1986). Candidates and policy in United States Senate elections.American Political Science Review 80: 567–590.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. David Gopoian
    • 1
  • Thom Yantek
    • 1
  1. 1.Political Science DepartmentKent State UniversityKent

Personalised recommendations