Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 269–283 | Cite as

Hair loss and electability: The bald truth

  • Lee Sigelman
  • Edwin Dawson
  • Michael Nitz
  • Marcia Lynn Whicker

Abstract

This study probes one particular component of the well documented linkage between personal appearance and impression formation by investigating the extent to which and the mechanisms through which bald and balding men are underrepresented in high elective office. Study 1 compares the prevalence of hair loss among governors and members of Congress, on the one hand, and the general public, on the other, and concludes that officeholders are much more likely to have a full head of hair than would be expected of men of their age. Study 2 poses an experimental test of voter bias against bald and balding candidates by presenting voters in a simulated congressional race with materials depicting otherwise identical candidates in either their natural bald or balding condition or wearing a professionally fitted hairpiece. No voter bias against bald or balding candidates is apparent, a finding that suggests that the causal mechanism underlying underrepresentation of bald and balding men is not voter bias.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, R. P., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., & Fiske, S. T. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 619–630.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, G. R. (1982). Physical attractiveness. In A. G. Miller (Ed.),In the eye of the beholder: Contemporary issues in stereotyping. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Barone, M., & Ujifusa, G. (1988).The almanac of American politics 1988. Washington, DC: National Journal.Google Scholar
  4. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1989).Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  5. Cash, T. F. (1988a).The effects of male pattern baldness on social impression formation. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  6. Cash, T. F. (1988b). The psychosocial effects of male pattern balding: Does losing it mean ‘losing it’?Hair Loss Journal, 4, 3–4.Google Scholar
  7. Chaiken, S. (1986). Physical appearance and social influence. In Herman, C. P., Zanna, M. P., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.),Physical appearance, stigma, and social behavior: The Ontario symposium, Volume 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, W. (1981).Hair: Sex, society, symbolism. New York: Stein and Day.Google Scholar
  9. Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. (1972). What is beautiful is good.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.Google Scholar
  10. Efran, M. G., & Patterson, E. W. J. (1974). Voters vote beautiful: The effect of physical appearance on a national election.Canadian Journal of Behavior Science, 6, 351–256.Google Scholar
  11. Franzoi, S. L., Anderson, J., & Frommelt, S. (1990). Individual differences in men's perceptions of and reactions to thinning hair.Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 209–218.Google Scholar
  12. Guthrie, R. D. (1977).Body hot spots: The anatomy of human social organs and behavior. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton, J. B. (1951). Patterned loss of hair in man: Types and incidence.Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 53, 708–728.Google Scholar
  14. Hankins, N. E., McKinnie, W. T., & Bailey, R. C. (1979) Effects of height, physique, and cranial hair on job-related attributes.Psychological Reports, 45, 853–854.Google Scholar
  15. Keating, C. F., Mazur, A., & Segall, M. H. (1981). A cross-cultural exploration of physiognomic traits of dominance and happiness.Ethology and Sociobiology, 2, 41–48.Google Scholar
  16. Klenhard, W. (1986).The bald book. Santa Monica, CA: Science-Med Press.Google Scholar
  17. Morris, D. (1985).Bodywatching: A field guide to the human species. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  18. Nimmo, D. D., & Savage, R. L. (1976).Candidates and their images. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.Google Scholar
  19. Norwood, O. T. (1984).Hair transplant surgery. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  20. Postman, N. (1985).Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  21. Roll, S., & Verinis, J. S. (1971). Stereotypes of scalp and facial hair as measured by the semantic differential.Psychological Reports, 28, 975–980.Google Scholar
  22. Rosenberg, S. M. (1990).Creating a political image: Shaping appearance and manipulating the vote. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenberg, S. M., Bohan, L., McCafferty, P., & Harris, K. (1986). The image and the vote: The effect of candidate presentation on voter preference.American Journal of Political Science, 30, 108–127.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenberg, S. M., & McCafferty, P. (1987). The image and the vote: Manipulating voters' preferences.Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 31–47.Google Scholar
  25. Sigelman, C. K., Thomas, D. B., Sigelman, L., & Ribich, F. D. (1986). Gender, physical attractiveness, and electability: An experimental investigation of voter biases.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 229–248.Google Scholar
  26. Sigelman, L., & Sigelman, C. K. (1987). A bird of a different feather? An experimental investigation of physical attractiveness and the electability of female candidates.Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 32–43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee Sigelman
    • 1
  • Edwin Dawson
  • Michael Nitz
  • Marcia Lynn Whicker
  1. 1.Office of the Dean, Faculty of Social and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of ArizonaTucson

Personalised recommendations