Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 209–236 | Cite as

Strangers meet: Laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters

  • Karl Grammer

Abstract

When strangers of the opposite-sex meet for the first time, both sexes are in a difficult situation. In this high risk situation, neither person knows the intention of the other, and consequently non-verbal signalling becomes the major channel for communication. Because of their higher biological risk, females should prefer less obvious tactics in order to communicate interest in a potential partner than males. The tactical task of signalling clearly, but at the same time subtly, is solved by the use of multifunctional or metacommunicative signals. In this study we propose that there is not one single meaning for any given signal. In laughing loudly we find a signal which consists of acoustical, mimical and postural information. In this way either laughter can send a “this is play” message or its meaning can be modified by other signals. Thus laughter, together with its accompanying body postures and movements, conveys messages that range from sexual solicitation to aversion, depending on which and how many different signals are present. Males seem to communicate interest for the female during laughter with only a few signals, such as body orientation and dominance signals. In contrast, females communicate interest via numerous signals which function as signals of bodily self-presentation and submission. In both sexes, a lack of interest is communicated through closed postures.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bateman, A. J. (1948). Sexual selection, natural selection and quality of advertisement.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 17, 375–393.Google Scholar
  2. Bollwig, N. (1964). Facial expression in primates with remarks on a parallel development in certain carnivores.Behaviour, 22, 167–193.Google Scholar
  3. Buss, D. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.Google Scholar
  4. Buss, D. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.Google Scholar
  5. Cook, M. (1981). Social skill and human sexual attraction. In Cook, M. (Ed.),The bases of human sexual attraction (pp. 144–177). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Darwin, C. (1871).The descent of man and selection in ratio to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  7. Darwin, C. (1872).On the expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  8. Duck, S., & Miell, D. (1983). Mate choice in humans as an interpersonal process. In P. Bateson (Ed.),Mate choice (pp. 377–385). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (1977).Face to face interaction: research methods and theory. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1984).Die Biologie des menschlichen Verhaltens. München: Piper.Google Scholar
  11. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1975).The biology of behavior. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  12. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1972). Hand movements.The Journal of Communication, 22, 353–374.Google Scholar
  13. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1978).Facial action coding system. Palo Alto: Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  14. Freud, S. (1912).Der Witz und seine Beziehung zum Unbewußten. Wien: Denticke.Google Scholar
  15. Givens, D. B. (1978). The non-verbal basis of attraction: Flirtation, Courtship and Seduction.Psychiatry, 41, 346–351.Google Scholar
  16. Goffman, E. (1976).Gender advertisements. The Society for the Anthropology of Visual Communication: London.Google Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. (1977). The arrangement between the sexes.Theory and Society, 4, 301–333.Google Scholar
  18. Grammer, K. (1985). Verhaltensforschung am Menschen. Überlegungen zu den biologischen Grundlagen des Umwegverhaltens. In M. Svilar (Ed.),Mensch und Tier (pp. 273–317). Bern-Frankfurt-New York: Lang.Google Scholar
  19. Grammer, K. (1989). Human courtship behaviour: biological bases and cognitive processing. In A. E. Rasa, C. Vogel & E. Volland (Eds.),The sociobiology of sexual and reproductive strategies (pp. 147–169). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Grammer, K. (in press). Zur Ethologie des Flirts. In C. Ehalt & I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt (Eds.),Sexualität zwischen Natur und Kultur. Wien: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Grammer, K., & Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1990). The ritualisation of laughter. In W. A. Koch (Ed.),Die Natürlichkeit der Sprache und der Kultur. Bochumer Beiträge zur Semiotik Vol. 18. (pp. 192–214). Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
  22. Hofstadter, D. (1981).Gödel, Escher, Bach: an eternal golden braid. London: Harvester.Google Scholar
  23. Moore, M. M. (1985). Nonverbal courtship patterns in women: context and consequences.Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 237–247.Google Scholar
  24. Norusis, M. (1986).Handbook for SPSSPC+. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
  25. Scheflen, A. (1965). Quasi-courtship behaviour in psychotherapy.Psychiatry, 28, 245–257.Google Scholar
  26. Scheflen, A. E., & Scheflen, A. (1972).Body language and social order. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Symonds, C. (1972). A vocabulary of sexual enticement and proposition.The Journal of Sex Research, 8.2, 136–139.Google Scholar
  28. Symons, D. (1979).The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Cambell (Ed.),Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  30. Van Hoof, J. A. R. A. M. (1972). A comparative approach to the phylogeny of laughter and smiling. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.),Non-verbal communication (pp. 209–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Grammer
    • 1
  1. 1.Forschungsstelle für Humanethologie in der Max-Planck-GesellschaftAndechsGermany

Personalised recommendations