Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 215–234 | Cite as

On Dutch windows

  • Hernan Vera


In The Netherlands, living room windows are big, left uncovered day and night, and elaborately decorated. This pattern, which is widespread in all urban and rural regions in this country, disappears abruptly as soon as the border into Germany is crossed where windows are generally smaller, consistently covered, and more sparsely decorated. Going south into Flanders, the disappearance of open and decorated windows is gradual but noticeable.

The cognitive and sensory meaning of a single object in material culture, the Dutch window, is examined as a concrete articulation of the boundary between the public and private realms by “thinking it with” successive conceptual frames in sociology. Assuming that material objects are embodiments of ideas, the study focuses on (a) the norms for looking and for looking out of the windows, (b) the territorial boundary being established and, (c) the information game played through the windows in a context of the notion of privacy. Photographs of the cultural objects under consideration, i.e., Dutch windows, are presented throughout the text as reminders that the cultural and material realms are sensually linked. The study concludes that objects in material culture must be examined in terms of the active, purposive acts we accomplish by adapting the objects to our practical and expressive needs.


Social Psychology Social Issue Single Object Cross Cultural Psychology Material Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bates, A. 1964 “Privacy: A Useful Concept?” Social Forces 43: 432–37.Google Scholar
  2. Berardo F. 1974 “Marital Invisibility and Family Privacy.” In Stephen T. Marguilis (Ed.) Man Environment Interactions: Evaluations and Applications. Vol. 6. pp. 36–48. Milwakee, Wisconsin: Environmental Design Research Association.Google Scholar
  3. Clay, G. 1980 Close-Up: How to Read the American City. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. De Weert, A. A. G. M. 1976 Belevings -en gebruikswaarde verbonden met ramen en overige binnen/buitenverbindingen van woningen. Amsterdam: Nationale Woningraad.Google Scholar
  5. Douglas, M. & Isherwood B. 1979 World of Goods. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Durkheim, E. 1969 The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. 1977 Discipline and Punish. Alan Sheridan (trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  8. Galle, O. R., Gove, W. R. & McPherson, J. M. 1970 “Population Density and Pathology.” Science 176: 23–30.Google Scholar
  9. 1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar
  10. 1969 Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goudsblom, J. 1967 Dutch Society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Groenman, S. 1981 Personal communication.Google Scholar
  13. Jacobs, J. 1961 The Death and Life of American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  14. Jourard, S. 1971 The Transparent Self. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  15. Lyman, S. M. & Scott, M. B. 1967 “Territoriality: A Neglected Sociological Dimension.” Social Problems 15 (2).Google Scholar
  16. Marcuse, H. 1978 The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Marx, K. 1973 Grundisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft). Martin Nicolaus (trans. and intro.). Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  18. 1967a Manuel d'Ethnographie. Paris: Editions Payot.Google Scholar
  19. 1967b The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. E. E. Evans-Pritchard (intro.), Ian Cunnison (trans.) New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Mukerji, C. 1983 From Graven Images: Patterns of Modern Materialism. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Newspaper Enterprize Association 1984 World Almanac. New York: Newspaper Enterprize Association.Google Scholar
  22. Riemersma, J. C. 1967 Religious Factors in Early Dutch Capitalism 1550–1650. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  23. Simmel, G. 1964 The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Kurt Wolff (trans., ed., and intro.) New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  24. Schama, S. 1987 The Embarrassment of Riches. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  25. Social and Cultural Planning Office 1978 Social and Cultural Report. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office.Google Scholar
  26. Weber, M. 1978 Economy and Society. G. Roth and C. Wittich (eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Westin, A. 1967 Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hernan Vera
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of FloridaGainesville

Personalised recommendations