Advertisement

Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 119–154 | Cite as

Visual ethnography: Using photography in qualitative research

  • Dona Schwartz
Articles

Abstract

This article proposes a new way to use photographs in ethnographic research. The method builds on earlier examinations of the unique properties of photographic articulation, interpretation and use, employing the inherent ambiguities of photographic imagery. Responses to ethnographic photographs of a rural farm community were recorded during group interview sessions and analyzed in relation to additional ethnographic data gathered in order to study sociocultural continuity and change across generations in farm families.

Keywords

Social Psychology Qualitative Research Unique Property Social Issue Group Interview 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barthes, R. 1964 “Rhetorique de l'image.” Communications 4.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. & Mead, M. 1942 Balinese Character. Special Publications of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. II. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, H. S. 1974 “Photography and Sociology.” Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 1 (1):3–26.Google Scholar
  4. 1964 “Still Photography in the Systematic Recording and Analysis of Behavioral Data.” Human Organization 23:78–84.Google Scholar
  5. 1966 “Cameras Don't Take Pictures.” Columbia University Forum 9:27–31.Google Scholar
  6. Caldarola, V. 1985 “Visual Contexts: A Photographic Research Method in Anthropology.” Studies in Visual Communication 11(3):33–53.Google Scholar
  7. Collier, J., Jr. 1967 Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
  8. Custen, G. F. 1982 “Talking About Film.” In Sari Thomas (Ed.), Film/Culture: Explorations of Cinema in its Social Context. Metuchen: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  9. Marron, M. F. 1976 “Eden Township.” In Helen Moeller, (Ed.), Out of the Midwest: A Portrait. Marceline: Walsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  10. Messaris, P. & Gross, L. 1977 “Interpretations of a Photographic Narrative by Viewers in Four Age Groups.” Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 4(2):99–111.Google Scholar
  11. Musello, C. 1980 “Studying the Home Mode: An Exploration of Family Photography and Visual Communication.” Studies in Visual Communication 6(1):23–42.Google Scholar
  12. Pallenik, M. J. 1976 “A Gunman in Town! Children Interpret a Comic Book.” Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 3(1):38–51.Google Scholar
  13. 1973 “Up the Zambesi with Notebook and Camera or Being an Anthropologist Without Doing Anthropology ... With Pictures.” Savicom Newsletter 4(3):12–15.Google Scholar
  14. 1976 “In a Pic's Eye: Interpretive Strategies for Deriving Significance and Meaning from Photographs.” Afterimage 3(9):5–7.Google Scholar
  15. Sekula, A. 1975 “On the Invention of Photographic Meaning.” Artforum 13(5):36–45.Google Scholar
  16. Wagner, J. (Ed.). 1979 Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Worth, S. 1980 “Margaret Mead and the Shift from ‘Visual Anthropology’ to the ‘Anthropology of Visual Communication.’” Studies in Visual Communication 6(1):15–22.Google Scholar
  18. Worth, S. & Gross, L. 1974 “Symbolic Strategies.” Journal of Communication 24(4):27–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dona Schwartz
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Journalism and Mass CommunicationsUniversity of MinnesotaMineapolis

Personalised recommendations