Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 339–357 | Cite as

Seizing the means of reproduction: An illegal feminist abortion collective—How and why it worked

  • Pauline B. Bart


This paper describes an illegal feminist abortion collective [the Service] through whose efforts 11,000 abortions were performed between 1969 and 1973 when abortion was legalized. An analysis of interviews from 32 members of this lay group indicates how and why the collective was so effective in providing what is usually a physician-controlled medical procedure. After describing the structure of the organization and the process by which women obtained the abortion, including pre-abortion counseling and post-abortion follow-up, two sets of reasons for the collective's effectiveness are presented. The first five reasons derive from the interview themselves; they deal with the organization's social and historical context, its illegality, its charismatic leaders, its member satisfaction and its financial self-sufficiency. The next nine reasons deal with factors that make The Service a relatively typical democratic collective organization. The most important of these factors is its lack of concern for organizational survival per se. This account supports the Rothschild-Whitt model for collective democratic organizations. It also suggests that counseling is important both for the providers and for the receivers of abortions.


Social Psychology Social Issue Historical Context Cross Cultural Psychology Medical Procedure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. The Abortion Counseling Service Date Not Given.Abortion — a woman's decision, a woman's right pamphlet. Chicago: Women's Liberation Movement.Google Scholar
  2. Bart, Pauline B., & Melinda Bart Schlesinger 1982 Collective work and self identity. In Frank Lindenfeld and Joyce Rothschild-Whitt,Workplace Democracy and Social Change. Boston: Porter Sargent.Google Scholar
  3. Ehrenreich, Barbara & Deidre English 1973Complaints and disorders: The sexual politics of sickness. Old Westbury: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar
  4. Heller, Ken, Richard Price, Shulamit Reinharz, Stephanie Riger, & Abraham Wandersman 1984Psychology and community change. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  5. Howell, Mary (pseud. Margaret Campbell) 1973Why would a girl go into medicine. Old Westbury: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar
  6. Joffe, Carole 1978 What abortion counselors want from their clients.Social Problems 26:112–121.Google Scholar
  7. Lindenfeld, Frank, & Joyce Rothschild-Whitt 1982Workplace, Democracy and Social Change. Boston: Porter Sargent.Google Scholar
  8. Marx, Karl 1985The German ideology. New York: The International Press.Google Scholar
  9. Michels, Robert 1949Political parties. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Peterson, Karen 1976 Creating divisions of labor: a case study of nonprofessionals professing self-help. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  11. Roth, J. A. 1974 Care of the sick: Professionalism vs. love.Social science and medicine 1173–180.Google Scholar
  12. Rothschild-Whitt, Joyce 1979 Conditions facilitating participatory-democratic organizations.Sociological Inquiry 46(2):75–86.Google Scholar
  13. Rothschild-Whitt, Joyce 1979 Collective democracy: An alternative to rational bureaucratic models of organization.American Sociological Review 44:519–529.Google Scholar
  14. Simmel, George 1950 The secret and the secret society. Pp. 307–16 inThe Sociology of George Simmel. Trans. edited and with an introduction by Kurt H. Wolff. Glencoe: The Free Press, 307–376.Google Scholar
  15. Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll 1975 The female world of love and ritual: relations between women in nineteenth-century America.Signs 1:1–29.Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, Rosemary 1976 Alternative medicine: Politics and organization in the free clinic movement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  17. Tietze, Christopher 1979Induced abortion: 1970, 3rd edition. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  18. Weber, Max 1968Economy and society. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittrich (eds.). New York: Bedminister Press.Google Scholar
  19. Zald, Mayer N., & Roberta Ash 1964 Social movement organizations: Growth decay and change.Social Forces 44:327–341.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pauline B. Bart
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Illinois Medical CenterChicago

Personalised recommendations