Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 17–23 | Cite as

Effect of pheromone concentration on organization of preflight behaviors of the male gypsy moth,Lymantria dispar(L.)

  • T. E. Hagaman
  • R. T. Cardé
Article

Abstract

Male gypsy moths (Lymantria dispar L.) in a wind tunnel at 24° respond to decreasing dosages (1 μg to 0.1 pg) of (+)-cis-7,8-epoxy-2-methyloctadecane with a decrease in probability of wing-fanning, an increase in wing-fanning latency, and an increase in the number of behaviors (body jerks, antennal twitches, steps, and wing tremors) preceding fanning. Males initiating any behavior prior to wing-fanning had a 70% probability of wing-fanning and 97% of the males that wing-fanned eventually flew. The sequence of behaviors from quiescence to flight is not organized in a hierarchy, as this concept is used in ethology, nor is it dependent upon the concentration of pheromone. The time-average threshold concentration of pheromone for response of ca. 90% or more quiescent males is ca. 1.9 × 10−17 g/cm3 over < 0.3 min.

Key words

Gypsy moth Lymantria dispar Lepidoptera Lymantriidae preflight male behavior (+)-cis-7,8-epoxy-2-methyloctadecane (+)-dis-parlure wing-fanning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baerends, G.P. 1976. The functional organization of behaviour.Anim. Behav. 24:726–738.Google Scholar
  2. Baerends, G.P., Brower, R., andWaterbolk, H.T. 1955. Ethological studies onLebistes reticulatus (Peters)Behaviour 8:249–334.Google Scholar
  3. Bartell, R.J. 1977. Behavioral responses of Lepidoptera to pheromones, pp. 201–213,in H.H. Shorey and J.J. McKelvey, Jr. (eds.). Chemical Control of Insect Behavior. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bartell, R.J., andShorey, H.H. 1969. Pheromone concentrations required to elicit successive steps in the mating sequence of males of the light-brown apple mothEpiphysas postvittana.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 62:1206–1207.Google Scholar
  5. Cardé, R.T., andHagaman, T.E. 1979. Behavioral responses of the gypsy moth in a wind tunnel to air-borne enantiomers of disparlure.Environ. Entomol. 8:475–484.Google Scholar
  6. Carde, R.T., andHagaman, T.E. 1983. Influence of ambient and thoracic temperatures upon sexual behaviour of the gypsy moth,Lymantria dispar.Physiol. Entomol. 8:7–14.Google Scholar
  7. Cardé, R.T., Doane, C.C., andRoelofs, W.L. 1974. Diel periodicity of male sex pheromone response and female attractiveness in the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae).Can. Entomol. 106:479–484.Google Scholar
  8. Charlton, R.E., andCardé, R.T. 1982. Rate and diel periodicity of pheromone emission from female gypsy moths,Lymantria dispar (L.) determined with a glass adsorption collection system.J. Insect Physiol. 28:423–430.Google Scholar
  9. Colgan, P.W., andSlater, P.J.B. 1980. Clustering acts from transition matrices.Anim. Behav. 28:965–966.Google Scholar
  10. Dawkins, R., andDawkins, M. 1976. Hierarchical organization and postural facilitation: Rules for grooming in flies.Anim. Behav. 24:739–755.Google Scholar
  11. Douglas, J.M., andTweed, R.L. 1979. Analyzing the patterning of a sequence of discrete behavioural events.Anim. Behav. 27:1236–1252.Google Scholar
  12. Elkinton, J.S.,Cardé R.T., andMason, C.J. 1984. Evaluation of time-average dispersion models for estimating pheromone concentration in a deciduous forest.J. Chem. Ecol. In press.Google Scholar
  13. Fagen, R.M., andGoldman, R.N. 1977. Behavioural catalogue models.Anim. Behav. 25:261–274.Google Scholar
  14. Farnum, D.G., Veysoglu, T., Carde, A.M., Duhl-Emswiler, B., Pancoast, T.A., Reitz, T.J., andCardé, R.T. 1977. A stereospecific synthesis of (+)-disparlure, sex attractant of the gypsy moth.Tetrahedron Lett. 46:4009–4012.Google Scholar
  15. Halliday, T.R. 1975. An observational and experimental study of sexual behavior in the smooth newt,Triturus vulgaris (Amphibia: Salamandridae).Anim. Behav. 23:291–322.Google Scholar
  16. Rust, M.K. 1976. Quantitative analysis of male responses released by female sex pheromone inPeriplaneta americana.Anim. Behav. 24:681–685.Google Scholar
  17. Schwinck, I. 1958. A study of olfactory stimuli in the orientation of moths.X Int. Cong. Entomol. 2:577–582.Google Scholar
  18. Shorey, H.H. 1973. Behavioral responses to insect pheromones.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 18:349–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Slater, P.J.B. 1973. Describing sequences of behavior, pp. 131–154,in P.P.G. Bateson and P.H. Klopfer (eds.). Perspectives in Ethology. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Tinbergen, N. 1950. The hierarchical organization of nervous mechanisms underlying instinctive behaviour.Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 4:305–312.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. E. Hagaman
    • 1
  • R. T. Cardé
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Entomology and Pesticide Research CenterMichigan State UniversityEast Lansing
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyDePauw UniversityGreencastle
  3. 3.Department of EntomologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherst

Personalised recommendations