Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 103–118 | Cite as

Chemical attraction of hermit crabs and other attendants to simulated gastropod predation sites

  • Dan Rittschof
Article

Abstract

Simulated gastropod predation sites were observed in the gulf intertidal near the Edward Ball Marine Laboratory, Sopchoppy, Florida,Fundulus similis, Callinectes sapidus, Melongena corona, Clibanarius vittatus, andPagurus longicarpus were attracted to the sites by small molecules released passively from the flesh of wounded or dead animals. Flesh consumers (F. similis, C. sapidus, andM. corona) were attracted to molecules released from the flesh of bivalves, gastropods, and crabs. Shell users (C. vittatus andP. longicarpus) were attracted only to small molecules from gastropod flesh, withP. longicarpus attendingP. duplicatas sites whileC. vittatus preferentially attendedM. corona, Busycon contrarium, andBusycon spiratum sites. Flesh consumers and shell users may be attracted to the sites by different sets of small molecules. The addition of proteolytic enzymes to the flesh increased the attendants at a site, indicating that the attractant molecules might be amino acids or small peptides. Flesh consumers were attracted to the sites primarily in the first 12 hr while the shell users were attracted from 2 hr to several days postinitiation. New shells were attractive to hermit crabs up to 12 hr after entry by a hermit crab. The shell species of the attendantC. vittatus were in different proportions than the generalC. vittatus population, and the shell fit of theP. longicarpus attendants was not as good as the general population ofP. longicarpus. Significantly moreC. vittatus attended than P. longicarpus, and it was speculated that there were moreC. vittatus in the area with a poor shell fit thanP. longicarpus.

Key words

Chemical signals hermit crabs gastropod predation sites Fundulus similis Callinectes sapidus Melongena corona Clibanarius vittatus Pagurus longicarpus P. duplicatus Busycon contrarium B. spiratum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ameyaw-Akumfi, C., andHazlett, B.A. 1975. Sex recognition in the crayfish,Procambarus clarkii.Science 190:1225–1226.Google Scholar
  2. Atema, J. 1978. Chemical senses, chemical signals, and feeding behavior in fishes. Proceedings of workshop on fish behavior and its possible applications in management and fisheries, Bellagio, Italy, November 1977. Bardach, Magnuson and May, (eds.) Int. Center Living Aq. Res. Man. Mannila, Philippines, (in press).Google Scholar
  3. Atema, J., andBurd, G. 1975. Afield study of chemotactic responses of the marine mud snail,Nassarius obsoletus.J. Chem. Ecol. 1(2):243–251.Google Scholar
  4. Atema J., andEngstrom, D.G. 1971. Sex pheromone in the lobster,Homarus americanus.Nature (London) 232:261–263.Google Scholar
  5. Atema, J., andStenzler, D. 1977. Alarm substance of the marine mud snail,Nassarius obsoletus: Biological characterization and possible evolution.J. Chem. Ecol. 3(2):173–187.Google Scholar
  6. Bach, C., Hazlett, B.A., andRittschof, D. 1976. The effects of interspecific competition on the hermit crabs,Clibanarius tricolor.Ecology 57:579–586.Google Scholar
  7. Bardach, J.E. 1975. Chemoreception of aquatic animals, pp. 121–132,in D. Demon and J. Coglan (eds.). Olfaction and Taste, Vol. V. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Frotheringham, N. 1976. Effects of shell stress on the growth of hermit crabs.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 23:655–671.Google Scholar
  9. Gore, R.H. 1966. Observations on the escape response inNassarius vibex (Say) (Mollusca, Gastropoda).Bull. Mar. Sci. 16:423–434.Google Scholar
  10. Hazlett, B.A. 1966. Social behavior of the Paguridae and Diogenidae of Curacao. Studies on the fauna of Curacao and other Caribbean islands. 23:1–143.Google Scholar
  11. Hazlett, B.A. 1975. Ethological analyses of reproductive behavior in marine Crustacea.Pubbl. Staz. Zool. Napoli 39(suppl):677–695.Google Scholar
  12. Jahan-Parwar, B. 1975. Chemoreception in gastropods, pp. 141–146,in D. Denton and J. Coglan, (eds.). Olfaction and Taste, Vol. V. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Laverack, M.S. 1975. Properties of chemoreceptors in marine Crustacea, pp. 141–146,in D. Denton and J. Coglan, (eds.). Olfaction and Taste, Vol. V. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. McLEAN, R.B. 1974. Direct shell acquisition by hermit crabs from gastropods.Experientia 30(2):206–208.Google Scholar
  15. McLean, R.B. 1975. A description of a marine benthic faunal habitat web. Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 109 pages.Google Scholar
  16. Reese, E.S. 1963. The behavioral mechanism underlying shell selection by hermit crabs.Anim. Behav. 21:78–126.Google Scholar
  17. Stenzler, D., andAtema, J. 1977. Alarm response of the marine mud snail,Nassarius obsoletus: Specificity and behavioral priority.J. Chem. Ecol. 3(2):159–171.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Rittschof
    • 1
  1. 1.Biochemistry DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaRiverside

Personalised recommendations