Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 81–95 | Cite as

The social role of scent marking in beaver (Castor Canadensis)

  • D. Müller-Schwarze
  • Susan Heckman
Article

Abstract

Beaver colonies with close neighbors constructed more “scent mounds” than did isolated colonies, and the number of scent mounds at each active lodge is correlated with the distance to the nearest occupied lodge. The scent mounds were typically located at trails, also on lodges and dams. The beaver rebuilt experimentally removed scent mounds. Experimentally scent-marked unoccupied lodges were less often visited or inhabited than unscented control lodges. Resident beaver responded to artificial scent marks near their lodges with aggressive behavior and increased activity. We conclude that scent mounds serve in delineating family territories and are effective in deterring transient beaver from utilizing existing but uninhabited lodges.

Key words

Beaver Castor canadensis deterrent function field experiment scent marking territory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aleksiuk, M. 1968. Scent mound communication, territoriality, and population regulation in the beaver.J. Mammal. 49:759–762.Google Scholar
  2. Bohlmann, F., Winterfeldt, E., Laurent, H., andUde, W. 1963. Synthese des DL-Castora-mins.Tetrahedron 19:195–208.Google Scholar
  3. Bradt, G.W. 1938. A study of beaver colonies in Michigan.J. Mammal. 19:139–162.Google Scholar
  4. Hay, K.G. 1958. Beaver census methods in the Rocky Mountain region.J. Wildl. Manage. 22:395–402.Google Scholar
  5. Hodgdon, H.E., andLarson, J.S. 1973. Some sexual differences in behaviour within a colony of marked beavers (Castor canadensis).Anim. Behav. 21:147–152.Google Scholar
  6. Lederer, E. 1950. Odeurs et parfums des animaux.Fortschr. Chem. Organ. Naturstoffe 6:87–153.Google Scholar
  7. Leighton, A. H. 1933. Notes on the relations of beavers to one another and to the muskrat.J. Mammal. 14:27–35.Google Scholar
  8. Maurer, B., andOhloff, G. 1976. Zur Kenntnis der stickstoffhaltigen Inhaltsstoffe von Castoreum.Helv. Chim. Acta 59:1169–1185.Google Scholar
  9. Mykytowycz, R. 1962. Territorial function of chin gland secretion in the rabbit,Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.).Nature 193:799.Google Scholar
  10. Mykytowycz, R. 1965. Further observations on the territorial function and histology of the submandibular cutaneous (chin) glands in the rabbit,Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.).Anim. Behav. 13:400–412.Google Scholar
  11. Novak, M. 1977. Determining the average size and composition of beaver families.J. Wildl. Manage. 41:751–754.Google Scholar
  12. Schaffer, J. 1940. Die Hautdrüsenorgane der Säugetiere. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Berlin and Vienna, 464 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Svendsen, G.E. 1978. Castor and anal glands of the beaver.J. Mammal. 59:618–620.Google Scholar
  14. Svendsen, G.E., andFabel, J.W. 1977. Frequency and the distribution of scent mounds in a population of beaver (Castor canadensis). Ann. Meet. Anim. Behav. Soc. Penn. State Univ. June 5–10, 1977 (abstract).Google Scholar
  15. Svendsen, G.E., andJollick, J.D. 1978. Bacterial contents of the anal and castor glands of beaver (Castor canadensis).J. Chem. Ecol. 4:563–569.Google Scholar
  16. Townsend, J.E. 1953. Beaver ecology in western Montana with special reference to movements.J. Mammal. 34:459–479.Google Scholar
  17. Valenta, Z., andKhaleque, A. 1959. The structure of castoramine.Tetrahedron Lett. 12:1–5.Google Scholar
  18. Wilsson, L. 1971. Observations and experiments on the ethology of the European beaver (Castor fiber L.).Viltrevy (Swedish Wildl.) 8:1–266.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Müller-Schwarze
    • 1
  • Susan Heckman
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Environmental Science and ForestryState University of New YorkSyracuse

Personalised recommendations