Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 10, Issue 7, pp 1151–1154

Redefining “Pharmacophagy”

  • Michael Boppré
Letter to the Editor

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blum, M.S. 1981. Chemical Defenses of Arthropods. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Boppré, M. 1978. Chemical communication, plant relationships, and mimicry in the evolution of danaid butterflies.Enlomol. Exp. Appl. 24:264–277.Google Scholar
  3. Boppré, M. 1984. Chemically mediated interactions between butterflies.Symp. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 11 (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Boppré, M., andScherer, G. 1981. A new species of flea beetles (Alticinae) showing male-biased feeding at witheredHeliotropium plants.Syst. Entomol. 6:347–354.Google Scholar
  5. Boppré, M.,Seibt, U., andWickler, W. 1984. Pharmacophagy in grasshoppers:Zonocerus being attracted to and ingesting pure pyrrolizidine alkaloids.Entomol. Exp. Appl. (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Brower, L.P. 1984. Chemical defense in butterflies.Symp. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 11 (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, J.A., andBrower, L.P. 1982. Oviposition and larval success of wild monarch butterflies (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) in relation to host plant size and cardenolide concentration.J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 55:343–348.Google Scholar
  8. Dixon, C.A., Erickson, J.M., Kellett, D.N., andRothschild, M. 1978. Some adaptations betweenDanaus plexippus and its food plant, with additional notes onDanaus chrysippus andEuploea core (Insecta: Lepidoptera).J. Zool. Lond. 185:437–467.Google Scholar
  9. Dodson, C.H. 1975. Coevolution of orchids and bees, pp. 91–99,in L.E. Gilbert and P.H. Raven (eds.). Coevolution of Animals and Plants. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  10. Dressler, R.L. 1982. Biology of the orchid bees (Euglossini).Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13:373–394.Google Scholar
  11. Haase, E. 1892. Untersuchungen über die Mimicry auf der Grundlage eines natürlichen Systems der Papilioniden. I. Entwurf eines natürlichen Systems der Papilioniden.Biblio. Zool. (Stuttgart) VIII:1–120.Google Scholar
  12. Pliske, T.E. 1975. Attraction of Lepidoptera to plants containing pyrrolizidine alkaloids.Environ. Entomol. 4:474–479.Google Scholar
  13. Rothschild, M. 1972. Secondary plant substances and warning colouration in insects.Symp. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 9:59–83.Google Scholar
  14. Schneider, D., andBoppré, M. 1981. Pyrrolizidin Alkaloide als Vorstufen fur die Duftstoff-Biosynthese und als Regulatoren für die Duftorgan-Morphogenese beiCreatonotos (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae).Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 1981:269.Google Scholar
  15. Schneider, D., BopprÉ, M., Zweig, J., Horsley, S.B., Bell, T.W., Meinwald, J., Hansen, K., andDiehl, W.E. 1982. Scent organ development inCreatonotos moths: Regulation by pyrrolizidine alkaloids.Science 215:1264–1265.Google Scholar
  16. Vogel, S. 1966. Parfümsammelnde Bienen als Bestäuber von Orchidaceen undGloxinia.Österr. Bot. Z. 113:302–361.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Boppré
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität Regensburg, Zoologie-SFB 4/B6RegensburgFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations