Advertisement

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 34–57 | Cite as

Partner effects in social interaction

  • David A. Kenny
  • Thomas E. Malloy
Article

Abstract

A person's behavior during social interaction is due not only to the person's dispositional characteristics but is also determined by his or her social partner. If a person consistently elicits the same behavior from others, the person has apartner effect. Partner effects in affect, cognition, and behavior are examined. Partner effects in behavior are presumed to be caused by partner effects in affect and cognition. A social relations analysis of data from six studies which meet rather strict methodological criteria suggests that partner effects are present in affect and cognition but are fairly weak. Further, partner effects are hardly evident at all on behavioral observations of friendliness and dominance, but are more evident in nonverbal behavior, especially gaze. The low level of partner effects is hypothesized to be due to the context in which the research was done, the degree of acquaintance between interaction partners, and the moderating effect of individual differences.

Keywords

Social Interaction Individual Difference Social Psychology Social Relation Relation Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387–395.Google Scholar
  2. Burleson, J. A. (1982). Reciprocity of interpersonal attraction within acquainted versus unacquainted small groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas.Google Scholar
  3. Byrne, D. (1971).The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, D. (1982). Determinants of responsiveness in dyadic interaction. In W. Ickes & E. Knowles (Eds.),Personality, roles, and social behavior (pp. 85–139). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. DePaulo, B. M., Kenny, D. A., Hoover, C., Webb, W., & Oliver, P. V. (1986). Accuracy in person perception: Do people know what kind of impressions they convey?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 303–315.Google Scholar
  6. Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (1977).Face to face interaction: Research, methods, and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972).A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Duncan, S., Kanki, B. G., Mokros, H., & Fiske, D. W. (1984). Pseudounilaterality, simple-rate variables, and other ills to which interaction research is heir.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1335–1348.Google Scholar
  9. Frances, S. J. (1979). Sex differences in nonverbal behavior.Sex Roles, 5, 519–535.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, J. A. (1985).Nonverbal sex differences. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ickes, W. (1982). A basic paradigm for the study of personality, roles, and social behavior. In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.),Personality, roles, and social behavior (pp. 305–341). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Ickes, W., & Barnes, R. D. (1977). The role of sex and self-monitoring in unstructured dyadic interactions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 315–330.Google Scholar
  13. Ickes, W. (1984). Compositions in black and white: Determinants of interaction in interracial dyads.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 330–341.Google Scholar
  14. Ickes, W., & Turner, M. (1983). On the social advantages of having an older, opposite-sex sibling: Birth order influences in mixed-sex dyads.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 210–222.Google Scholar
  15. Jacklin, C. N., & Maccoby, E. E. (1978). Social behavior at 33 months in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads.Child Development, 49, 557–569.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, W. H., Hobbs, S. A., & Hockenbury, D. (1982). Loneliness and social skills deficits.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 682–689.Google Scholar
  17. Kane, J. S., & Lawler, E. E. (1978). Methods of peer assessment.Psychological Bulletin, 85, 555–586.Google Scholar
  18. Kenny, D.A. (1981). Interpersonal perception: A multivariate round robin analysis. In M. B. Brewer & B. E. Collins (Eds.),Scientific inquiry in the social sciences: A volume in honor of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 288–309). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Kenny, D. A. (1987a). SOREMO: A FORTRAN program for round robin data structures. University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  20. Kenny, D. A. (1987b). BLOCKO: A FORTRAN program for block data structures. University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  21. Kenny, D. A. (1988). What makes a relationship special? In T. Draper & A. C. Marcos (Eds.),Family variables: Conceptualization, measurement, and use. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, in press.Google Scholar
  22. Kenny, D. A., & Bernstein, N. (1982).Interactions between opposite-sex strangers. Unpublished data set, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  23. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vol. 18, pp. 141–182). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kenny, D. A., & Nasby, W. (1980). Splitting the reciprocity correlation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 249–256.Google Scholar
  25. Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate.American Psychologist, 43, 23–34.Google Scholar
  26. Kraemer, H. C., & Jacklin, C. N. (1979). Statistical analysis of dyadic social behavior.Psychological Bulletin, 86, 217–224.Google Scholar
  27. La Voie, L. (1985).CHECKERS: A FORTRAN program for the checkers design. Miami University of Florida.Google Scholar
  28. Leary, T. (1957).Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
  29. Lindzey, G., & Byrne, D. (1968). Measurement of social choice and interpersonal attractiveness. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 452–525). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  30. McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception.Psychological Review, 90, 215–238.Google Scholar
  31. McGillan, V. (1980).Sex-role stereotypes and interpersonal behavior. Unpublished data, Clark University.Google Scholar
  32. Malloy, T. E. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The social relations model: An integrative method for personality research.Journal of Personality, 54, 199–225.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, L. C., Berg, J. M., & Archer, R. L. (1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234–1244.Google Scholar
  34. Moskowitz, D. S. (1988).Cross-situational generality in the laboratory. Unpublished paper, McGill University.Google Scholar
  35. Moskowitz, D. S., & Schwarz, J. C. (1982). Validity comparison of behavior counts and ratings by knowledgeable informants.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 518–528.Google Scholar
  36. Norman, W. T., & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 681–691.Google Scholar
  37. Park B., & Flink, C. (1988).Sources of disagreement in evaluative judgments of social targets. Unpublished paper, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  38. Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., Hacker, T. A., & Basham, R. R. (1986). Concomitants of social support: Social skills, physical attraction, and gender.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 469–480.Google Scholar
  39. Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.Google Scholar
  40. Strack, S., & Coyne, J. C. (1983). Social confirmation of dysphoria: Shared and private reactions to depression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 798–806.Google Scholar
  41. Swap, W. C., & Rubin, J. Z. (1983). Measurement of interpersonal orientation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 208–219.Google Scholar
  42. Thorne, A. (1987). The press of personality: A study of conversations between introverts and extraverts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 718–726.Google Scholar
  43. Warner, R., Kenny, D. A., & Stoto, M. (1979). A new round robin analysis of variance for social interaction data.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1742–1757.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Kenny
    • 2
  • Thomas E. Malloy
    • 1
  1. 1.the Department of Psychology at Rhode Island CollegeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology U-20University of ConnecticutStorrs

Personalised recommendations