Advertisement

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 195–209 | Cite as

Personal space claims as a function of interpersonal threat: The mediating role of need for control

  • Michael J Strube
  • Carol Werner
Article

Abstract

Previous research suggests that the concept of control is central to understanding spatial regulation. Similarly, control motivation appears to underlie the individual difference variable of Type A behavior. Based on this commonality it was hypothesized that Type A behavior would mediate spatial claims in response to situational threat. Results confirmed this hypothesis. Type A's claimed larger spaces overall, and more space in front of the body in response to threat, than Type B's. Differential results for size and shape of personal space suggest the multidimensional nature of spatial regulation.

Keywords

Individual Difference Social Psychology Control Motivation Large Space Spatial Regulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, C.N., & Scriven, G.D. Role-playing: an essential component of experimentation.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1977,3 455–466.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, I.The environment and social behavior: privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1968.Google Scholar
  4. Baum, A., Aiello, J.R., & Calesnick, L.E. Crowding and personal control: social density and the development of learned helplessness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978,36 1000–1011.Google Scholar
  5. Brehm, J.W.Responses to loss of freedom: a theory of psychological reactance. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  6. Brunson, B.I., & Matthews, K.A. The Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern and reactions to uncontrollable stress: an analysis of performance strategies, affect, and attributions during failure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981,40 906–918.Google Scholar
  7. Carver, C.S. Perceived coercion, resistance to persuasion, and the Type A behavior pattern.Journal of Research in Personality 1980,14 467–481.Google Scholar
  8. Cozby, P.C. Effects of density, activity, and personality on environmental preferences.Journal of Research in Personality 1973,7 45–60.Google Scholar
  9. Cronbach, L.J., & Furby, L. How should we measure “change” — or should we?Psychological Bulletin 1970,74 68–80.Google Scholar
  10. Dembroski, T.M., Weiss, S.M., Shields, J.L., Haynes, S.G., & Feinleib, M. (Eds.),Coronaryprone behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. Dooley, B.B. Crowding stress: the effects of social density of men with “close” and “far” personal space. Reported in C. Greenberg, Crowding and environmental control. In M.R. Gurkaynak & W.A. LeCompte (Eds.),Human consequences of crowding. New York: Plenum, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. Dosey, M.A., & Meisels, M. Personal space and self-protection.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969,11 93–97.Google Scholar
  13. Edney, J.J. Territoriality and control: a field experiment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,31 1108–1115.Google Scholar
  14. Edney, J.J., Walker, C.A., & Jordan, N.L. Is there reactance in personal space?Journal of Social Psychology 1976,100 207–217.Google Scholar
  15. Freedman, J.L. Role playing: Psychology by consensus.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968,13 107–114.Google Scholar
  16. Geller, D.M. Involvement in role-playing simulations: a demonstration with studies on obedience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978,36 219–235.Google Scholar
  17. Glass, D.C.Behavior patterns, stress, and coronary disease. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Greenberg, C.I. Crowding and environmental control. In M.R. Grukaynak & W.D. LeCompte (Eds.),Human consequences of crowding. New York: Plenum, 1978.Google Scholar
  19. Greenberg, C.I., Strube, M.J., & Myers, R. A multitrait-multimethod investigation of interpersonal distance.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1980,5 104–114.Google Scholar
  20. Hayduk, L.A. Personal space: an evaluative and orienting overview.Psychological Bulletin 1978,85 117–134.Google Scholar
  21. Hayduk, L.A. The permeability of personal space.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 1981,13 274–287.Google Scholar
  22. Hendrick, C. Role-taking, role-playing, and the laboratory experiment.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1977,3 467–478.Google Scholar
  23. Horowitz, M.J. Spatial behavior and psychopathology.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1968,146 24–35.Google Scholar
  24. Horowitz, M.J., Duff, D.F., & Stratton, I.O. Body-buffer zone.Archives of General Psychiatry 1964, 11, 651–656.Google Scholar
  25. Kirk, R.E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1968.Google Scholar
  26. Krantz, D.S., Glass, D.C., & Snyder, M.L. Helplessness, stress level, and the coronary-prone behavior pattern.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1974,10 284–300.Google Scholar
  27. Matthews, K.A. Psychological perspectives on the Type A behavior pattern.Psychological Bulletin 1982,91 293–323.Google Scholar
  28. Milgram, S. Behavioral study of obedience.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963,67 371–378.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, A. Role playing: An alternative to deception? A review of the evidence.American Psychologist 1972,27 623–636.Google Scholar
  30. Mixon, D. Behavior analysis treating subjects as actors rather than organism.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 1971,1 19–31.Google Scholar
  31. Mixon, D. Instead of deception.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 1972,2 145–177.Google Scholar
  32. Mixon, D. Why pretend to deceive?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1977,3 647–653.Google Scholar
  33. Orne, M. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.American Psychologist 1962,17 776–783.Google Scholar
  34. Proshansky, H.M., Ittelson, W.H., & Rivlin, L.G. Freedom of choice and behavior in a physical setting. In H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson, & L.G. Riylin (Eds.),Environmental psychology: people and their physical settings. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1970.Google Scholar
  35. Rhodewalt, F., & Comer, R. Coronary-prone behavior: the attractiveness of an eliminated choice.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1982,8 152–158.Google Scholar
  36. Rhodewalt, F., & Davison, J., Jr. Reactance and the coronary-prone behavior pattern: the role of self-attribution in response to reduced behavioral freedom.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  37. Rodin, J., Solomon, S.K., & Metcalf, J. Role of control in mediating perceptions of density.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978,36 988–999.Google Scholar
  38. Schmidt, D.E., & Keating, J.P. Human crowding and personal control: an integration of research.Psychological Bulletin 1979,86 680–700.Google Scholar
  39. Seligman, M.E.P.Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.Google Scholar
  40. Severy, L.J., Forsyth, D.R., & Wagner, P.J. A multimethod assessment of personal space development in female and male, black and white, children.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1980,4 68–86.Google Scholar
  41. Stokols, D. A social-psychological model of human crowding phenomena.Journal of the American Institute of Planners 1972,38 72–83.Google Scholar
  42. Strube, M.J., & Werner, C. Interpersonal distance and personal space: a conceptual and methodological note.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 1982,6 163–170.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J Strube
    • 1
  • Carol Werner
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWashington UniversitySt. Louis

Personalised recommendations