Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 105–114 | Cite as

Beliefs about cues associated with deception

  • Miron Zuckerman
  • Richard Koestner
  • Robert Driver


People's beliefs about the association of 19 visual and auditory cues with deception were assessed in one of two questionnaires: Subjects were asked to indicate the association of each cue with deception in their own behavior (self-perception condition) or in other people's behavior (other-perception condition). The 19 behaviors listed in the questionnaires had been previously examined in research on actual behaviors associated with deception; ten of these behaviors had also been examined in research on cues associated with judgment of deception. Stronger association between the various cues and deception were obtained in the other-perception than in the self-perception condition, indicating that people believe they control their own deceptive behavior better than other people control theirs. Beliefs about the association of each behavior with deception (averaged across the two conditions and sex of respondents) correlated .11 with the actual association of each cue with deception, and .44 with the association of each cue with judgment of deception. The possibility that the correspondence between beliefs about deception and actual cues to deception is higher for some specific types of lie-telling was discussed.


Social Psychology Strong Association Actual Behavior Actual Association Deceptive Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Notes

  1. DePaulo, B.M., Rosenthal, R., Rosenkrantz, J., & Green, C.R. Actual and perceived cues to deception. Manuscript submitted for view, University of Virginia, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. Krauss, R.M., Geller, V., & Olson, C. Modalities and cues in the detection of deception. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., September, 1976.Google Scholar


  1. Cohen, J.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. DePaulo, B.M., Lassiter, G.D., & Stone, J.I. Attentional determinants of success at detecting deception.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, in press.Google Scholar
  3. Hemsley, G.D., & Doob, A.N. The effect of looking behaviors on perceptions of a communicator's credibility.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1978, 8, 136–44Google Scholar
  4. Kraut, R. Humans as lie detectors.Journal of Communication, 1980,30, 209–216.Google Scholar
  5. Rosenthal, R. Combining results of independent studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 185–193.Google Scholar
  6. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. The verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowtiz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 14, New York: Academic Press, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miron Zuckerman
    • 1
  • Richard Koestner
  • Robert Driver
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of RochesterRochester

Personalised recommendations