Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 223–241 | Cite as

A modest test of cross-cultural differences in sexual modesty, embarrassment and self-disclosure

  • H. W. Smith
Article

Abstract

Borrowing Hall's (1976) analytic distinction between Low and High Context Cultures, seven hypotheses distinguishing German nudists (low context) from French nudists (high context) are deduced. Data collected at public nudism beaches in France and Germany supports these differences; namely, that Germans have more overt time-space segmentation of activities, less differentiation of sexuality and sensuality, less body display, more male-dominated cross-sex body contact, more segregation of parts of the body, more staring behavior and more concern with accentuation of the body. These differences lead to conclusions that formulations by Weinberg (1964) of embarrassment and modesty are specific to high context cultures like the United States and West Germany and are inappropriate in low context cultures like France. Future trends in nudism are discussed along with the implications for modesty, embarrassment and self-disclosure.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Casler, Lawrence 1964 “Some sociopsychological observations in a nudist camp.” Journal of Social Psychology 72:307–322.Google Scholar
  2. Edney, Julian J. and Nancy Jordan-Edney 1974 “Territorial spacing on a beach.” Sociometry 37:105–115.Google Scholar
  3. Francoeur, Robert T. and Anna K. Francoeur 1974 Hot and Cool Sex: Cultures in Conflict. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  4. Gieb, Frederick A. 1956 “Nudism's slice of life.” Modern Sunbathing 27: 29–38.Google Scholar
  5. Hall, Edward T. 1976 Beyond Culture. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  6. Hartman, William E., Marilyn Fithian; and Donald Johnson 1970 Nudist Society: An Authoritative Complete Study of Nudism in America. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Ilfeld, Fred Jr. and Roger Lauer 1964 Social Nudism in America. New Haven, Conn.: College and University Press Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Jourard, Sidney M. 1971 Self-Disclosure: An Experimental Analysis of the Transparent Self. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  9. Killian, L.M. 1964 “Social movements.” in R.E.L. Faris (ed.), Handbook of Modern Sociology. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
  10. McLuhan, Marshall 1964 Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
  11. Merrill, Francis and Mason Merrill 1931 Among the Nudists. New York: A.A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  12. Seal, Herb 1960 “Family-group identification with the nudist movement of Oregon and Southern California.” San Francisco State College, unpublished Master's thesis.Google Scholar
  13. Smelser, Neil J. 1963 Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Weber, J.A. 1978 “Group territorial spacing on French and German beaches: A cross-national analysis, including nudist and non-nudist groups.” Edwardsville, Ill.: Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville, unpublished master's thesis.Google Scholar
  15. Weinberg, Martin S. 1964 “Sexual modesty, social meanings, and the nudist camp.” Social Problems 12:311–318.Google Scholar
  16. —— 1965 “Sex, modesty and deviants.” Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
  17. —— 1966 “Becoming nudist.” Psychiatry 29: 15–24.Google Scholar
  18. —— 1967 “Nudist camp, way of life and social structure.” Human Organization 26: 91–99.Google Scholar
  19. —— 1968 “Embarrassment: Its variable and invariable aspects.” Social Forces 46: 382–388.Google Scholar
  20. —— 1970 “The nudist management of respectability strategy for, and consequences of, the construction of a situated morality.” Pp. 375–403 in Jack D. Douglas (ed.), Deviance and Respectability: The Social Construction of Moral Meanings. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. W. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MissouriSt. Louis

Personalised recommendations