Lifestyles

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 111–122 | Cite as

Women's perceived stress and well-being following voluntary and involuntary relocation

  • Paula P. Makowsky
  • Alicia Skinner Cook
  • Peggy S. Berger
  • Judith Powell
Article

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between voluntary and involuntary relocation and women's perceptions of stress and amount of control, as well as their satisfaction with personal well-being. Results indicated that involuntary movers felt significantly less control and had lower levels of satisfaction with the relationship with their spouses than did voluntary movers. Educational level and employment status were also explored in relation to the dependent variables. Women with high school/trade school education had significantly higher levels of perceived stress, feelings of less control, and lower levels of satisfaction with family life than women with more education.

Key words

Stress Relocation Geographic Mobility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ammons, P., Nelson, J., & Wodarski, J. (1982). Surviving corporate moves: Sources of stress and adaptation among corporate families.Family Relations, 31 207–212.Google Scholar
  2. Brett, J. (1982). Job transfer and well-being.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 450–463.Google Scholar
  3. Brett, J., & Werbel, J. (1980).The effect of job transfer on employees and their families: Final report. Washington, DC: Employee Relocation Council.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, E., McAllister, R., & Kaiser, E. (1973). The effects of voluntary and involuntary residential mobility on females and males.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 35 219–227.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, A. (1981).The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rogers, W. (1976).The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, S., Karmarck, T., & Mermelstein, K. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24 385–396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Duncan, R., & Perrucci, C. (1976). Dual occupation families and migration.American Sociological Review, 41 252–261.Google Scholar
  9. Fried, M. (1965). Transitional functions of working-class communities: Implications for forced relocation. In M.B. Kantor (Ed.),Mobility and mental health (pp. 123–165). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  10. Gaylord, M. (1979). Relocation and the corporate family: Unexplored issues.Social Work, 24 186–191.Google Scholar
  11. Glenn, N., & Supancic, M. (1984). The social and demographic correlates of divorce and separation in the United States: An update and reconsideration.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46 563–575.Google Scholar
  12. Hayghe, H. (1984). Working mothers reach record number in 1984.Monthly Labor Review, 107(3), 31–34.Google Scholar
  13. Hooker, C. (1976). Learned helplessness.Social Work, 21 194–198.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, S. (1973). Geographic mobility as seen by the wife and mother.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 35 210–218.Google Scholar
  15. Pearlin, L., Lieberman, M., Menaghan, E., & Mullan, J. (1981). The stress process.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22 337–356.Google Scholar
  16. Renshaw, J. (1976). An exploration of the dynamics of the overlapping worlds of work and family.Family Process, 15 143–165.Google Scholar
  17. Richards, S., Donahue, K., & Gullotta, T. (1985). Corporate families and mobility: A review of the literature.Family Therapy, 12 59–73.Google Scholar
  18. Shumaker, S., & Stokols, D. (1982). Residential mobility as a social issue and research topic.Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
  19. Spitze, G. (1986). Family migration largely unresponsive to wife's employment (across age groups).Sociology and Social Research, 70 231–234.Google Scholar
  20. Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. (1982). The psychological context of residental mobility and well-being.Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 149–171.Google Scholar
  21. Tallon, J. (1979). Geographic mobility and the two-career family. In S. Peterson, J. Richardson, & G. Kreuter (Eds.),The two-career family: Issues and alternatives (pp. 227–239). Washington, DC: University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Voydanoff, P. (1987).Work and family life. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Weiss, R. (1969). The fund of socialiability.Trans-Action, 6(9), 36–43.Google Scholar
  24. Weissman, M., & Paykel, E. (1972). Moving and depression in women.Social Science and Modern Society, 9 24–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula P. Makowsky
    • 1
  • Alicia Skinner Cook
    • 2
  • Peggy S. Berger
    • 3
  • Judith Powell
    • 4
  1. 1.Catholic Social ServicesPhoenix
  2. 2.Colorado State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Colorado State UniversityUSA
  4. 4.University of WyomingUSA

Personalised recommendations