Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 5, Issue 5, pp 737–751 | Cite as

Perineal scent gland of wild and domestic guinea pigs

A comparative chemical and behavioral study
  • Judith L. Wellington
  • Kevin J. Byrne
  • George Preti
  • Gary K. Beauchamp
  • Amos B. SmithIII
Article

Abstract

Wild and domestic male guinea pigs (Cavia aperea andCavia porcellus) prefer the perineal secretion from males of the same species to that of males of the other species. Gas chromatographic-mass spectroscopic analyses of the volatile components of the secretions show complex mixtures comprised primarily of fatty acids, alcohols, and ketones. Inter-species differences in the composition of the volatiles are evident. The possible role of bacteria in odor production is discussed.

Key Words

Chemical communication guinea pig skin secretion scent mark C. aperea C. porcellus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albone, E. 1977. Ecology of mammals—a new focus for chemical research.Chem. Br. 13:92–99.Google Scholar
  2. Albone, E.S., andPeuy, G.C. 1975. Anal sac secretion of the red fox,Vulpes vulpes; volatile fatty acids and diamines: Implications for a fermentation hypothesis of recognition.J. Chem. Ecol. 2:101–111.Google Scholar
  3. Beauchamp, G.K. 1973. Attraction of male guinea pigs to conspecific urine.Physiol. Behav. 10:589–594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beauchamp, G.K. 1974. The perineal scent gland and social dominance in the male guinea pig.Physiol. Behav. 13:669–673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beauchamp, G.K., andBerüter, J. 1973. Source and stability of attractive components in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) urine.Behav. Biol. 9:43–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beauchamp, G.K., Magnus, J.G., Shmunes, N.T., andDurham, T. 1977. Effects of olfactory bulbectomy on social behavior of male guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus),J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91:336–346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beauchamp, G.K., Criss, B.R., andWellington, J.L. 1979. Chemical Communication inCavia: Responses of Wild (C. aperea), domestic (C. porcellus), and F1 males to urine.Anim. Behav. 27:1066–1072.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Beroza, M. andBierl, B.A. 1966. Apparatus for ozonolysis of microgram to milligram amounts of compound.Anal. Chem. 38:1976–1977.Google Scholar
  9. Beroza, M., andBierl, B.A., 1967. Rapid determination of olefin position in organic compounds in microgram range by ozonolysis and gas chromatography.Anal. Chem. 39:1131–1135.Google Scholar
  10. Berüter, J., Beauchamp, G.K., andMuetterities, E.T. 1974. Mammalian chemical communication: Perineal gland secretion of the guinea pig.Physiol. Zool. 47:130–136.Google Scholar
  11. Brownlee, R.G., andSilverstein, R.M. 1968. A micro-preparative gas Chromatographic and a modified carbon skeleton determination.Anal. Chem. 40:2077–2079.Google Scholar
  12. Corey, E.J., andVenkateswarly, A., 1972. Protection of hydroxyl groups astert-butyldimethylsilyl derivatives.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94:6190–6191.Google Scholar
  13. Daly, M. 1977. Some experimental tests of the functional significance of scent-marking by gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus).J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91:1082–1094.Google Scholar
  14. Doty, R.L. 1973. Reactions of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) to homospecific and heterospecific urine odors.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 84:296–303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Doty, R.L. 1979. Scent marking in mammals,in R. Denny (ed.). Comparative Psychology: Research in Animal Behavior. In press.Google Scholar
  16. Godfrey, J. 1958. The origin of sexual isolation between bank voles.Proc. R. Phys. Soc. Edinburgh 27:47–55.Google Scholar
  17. Gorman, M.L., Nedwell, D.B., andSmith, R.M. 1974. An analysis of the anal scent pockets ofHerpestes auropunctatus.J. Zool. 172:389–399.Google Scholar
  18. Grosz, S. 1905. Über den Perinealsack vonCavia cobaya und seine Drüsen.Z. Wissen. Zool. 78:261–267.Google Scholar
  19. Jacobs, W.W. 1976. The male-female association in domestic guinea pigs.Anim. Learn. Behav. 4:77–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, R.P. 1973. Scent marking in mammals.Anim. Behav. 21:521–535.Google Scholar
  21. Kunkel, P., andKunkel, I. 1964. Beiträge zur Ethologie des HausmeerschweinchensCavia aperer f. porcellus (L.).Z. Tierpsychol. 21:602–641.Google Scholar
  22. Leon, M. A. 1975. Dietary control of maternal pheromones in the lactating rat.Physiol. Behav. 14:311–319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Moore, R.E. 1965. Olfactory discrimination as an isolating mechanism betweenPeromyscus maniculatus andPeromyscus polionotus.Am. Midl. Nat. 73:85–100.Google Scholar
  24. Nevo, E., Bodmer, M., andHeth, G. 1976. Olfactory discrimination as an isolating mechanism in speciating mole rats.Separatum Exp. 32:1511–1512.Google Scholar
  25. Ralls, K. 1971. Mammalian scent marking.Science 171:443–449.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rây, P.C., andJânâ, S.C. 1913. The vapour density of ammonium nitrate, benzoate and acetate.J. Chem. Soc. 103:1565–1568.Google Scholar
  27. Rood, J.P. 1972. Ecological and behavioral comparisons of three genera of Argentine cavies.Anim. Behav. Monogr. 5:1–83.Google Scholar
  28. Schultz-Westrum, T. 1965. Immerartliche Verständigung durch Düfte beine Gleitbeut letPetaurus breviceps papuanus Thomas (Marsupialia, phalangeridae).Z. Vergl. Physiol. 50:151–220.Google Scholar
  29. Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Singer, A.G., Agosta, W.C., O'Connell, R.J., Pfaffmann, C., Bowen, D.V., andField, F.H. 1976. Dimethyl disulfide: An attractant pheromone in hamster vaginal secretion.Science 191:948–950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Watson, J.T., andBiemann, K. 1965. Direct recording of high resolution mass spectra of gas chromatographic effluents.Anal. Chem. 38:844–851.Google Scholar
  32. Zlatkis, A., Lichtenstein, H.A., andTishbee, A. 1973. Concentration and analysis of trace volatile organics in gases and biological fluids with a new solid adsorbent.Chromatographia 6:67–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith L. Wellington
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kevin J. Byrne
    • 1
  • George Preti
    • 1
    • 3
  • Gary K. Beauchamp
    • 1
    • 4
  • Amos B. SmithIII
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The Monell Chemical Senses CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia
  3. 3.Departments of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia
  4. 4.Departments of Otorhinolaryngology and Human CommunicationsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations